Introduction
Lets get it started
2 ways of repairing -- plate, which is simply welded over the top of the rust, or a butt weld, where the rot is cut out and a patch welded in to fit the hole.
The first will generally get the car through an MOT, but condemns the car to death -- rust will simply spread beneath the patch and continue to spread. So, the second is infinitely preferable.
Any repair in the rear wheel arch will almost certainly be in a prescribed area (see the MOT stuff on line for details) so rivet and bond won't be acceptable unless the part was originally constructed that way (it certainly wasn't).
MOT men have seen it all -- they're not easily fooled, and the rules get tighter every year.
Still, it's a bit of welding, nothing special. Any decent local garage should be able to sort it.
Yes welding is by far better but if you have no access to a welder and dont want to pay anyone just saying that's what I would do . Most manufacturers ( vauxhall bmw ) are using bond and rivit to repair the vehicles as it is stronger then welds believe it or not I didn't but ive been on the bmw corse and seen it for my self .
The garage that my mother has always taken her beloved Fiat Uno (now 20 years old) to has failed it yet again (about the 8th time in exactly the same places) for welding requirements. Although the car has only done 40 miles this year, the garage in question found three holes, one in each sill (about 4cm x 1cm each, halfway along each of the front doors) and a more severe hole (6cm x 4cm) under the pedals.
We repaired the sills using a chemical weld compound and strips of galvanised steel, but resorted to bolting large sheets of steel under the pedals ... effectively completely replacing the floor pan at that point.
When we took it back for a retest, the garage insist (as it's worth £120 to them) that the repairs must be welded, but I don't see why. The points are not structural and other parts of the car (like the wings) are bolted on. At what point does body filler become unnacceptable and a weld become necessary? Robin Rixon
It is an absolute requirement that any repairs required as a result of corrosion following a failed MOT must, with but a few exceptions be seam welded.
The actual requirements regarding whether or not excessive structural corrosion comprises a failure are quite complex, very specific and laid down by the authorities in the "Tester's Manual" – effectively the 'bible' of how MOT Tests MUST be conducted by the Testing garage.
So whether or not your vehicle should have failed in the first place is something I cannot comment on. I can, however, say with absolute certainty that if a structural repair is required, the way you have done it is totally unsatisfactory and would always result in a failure at re-Test. - MOTT
Good work with that burnt orange GT by the way it looks mint! Good effort!!!
View attachment 136282
Washed and looking a bit more respectable
nice, gotta love a set of ronal turbo's... And they are so old that not everyone has a set like they once did Only thing wrong with this car is that it is not mine lol. Drop me a line if you ever want to sell it lol