I just realised....

Currently reading:
I just realised....

Oh yeah, didn't notice Stu's post. Do you think if I write Calvin enough, Paul will start spelling that wrong as well.

Calvin Calvin Calvin Kelvin oops Calvin Calvin Calvin Calvin, etc.
 
Postscript:
A number of readers responded to this article with some interesting comments.

First, many people believed that Fahrenheit originally set 100 degrees to be the temperature of the human body. In fact, according to several sources I encountered, it seems he did use body temperature as one of the upper defining points of the thermometer. But, oddly, he chose 96 and not 100 as the number representing that temperature. The reasoning, it appears, was that the coldest salt water could go before freezing was 0; the coldest pure water could go before freezing was 32; so body temperature should be 96 (which happens to be 3 x 32). He later adjusted his scale when he discovered that the body's temperature was more accurately 98.6 degrees. He ultimately gave up on this measure, instead calibrating all thermometers by using freezing water and boiling water.

I could find no explanation for why he chose 32 to be his magic number, rather than 30, 25 or 100.

And finally, just when you thought that Celsius really did make more sense, one ready pointed me to an interesting website on the history of the Celsius scale. According to Anders Celsius's original notes, it seems he originally set zero to be the temperature of boiling water and 100 to be the temperature of freezing water. So rather than going up as it got hotter, the Celsius scale went down!
 
Centigrade is just a silly name for celsius, just showing that it is graduated in a way that makes waters boiling point 100, hence the centi bit.

At least I assume that is the case.
 
I can't be arsed looking either, i'm going for a cup of cheap and nasty free coffee in the work canteen
 
I had heard that before QI and though "ou I knew that" when it came up, not that I would have spelt it right :p

Stu, AFAIK it was just another set of units which made more sense - we're quite good fixing stupid units but so many stil exist; I seem to have to use and convert day in day out on my course.

I didn't know until the beginning of my course that Rankin existed; this is just another scale like Kelvin, same difference in markings just has absolute 0 at 0.....

I won't ever spell Kelvin incorrectly because I learnt it correctly the first time :D
 
Talking of fact about units. Did you know that the original 1kilo weight which is kept in an air tight vault in france is gaining weight. They used to have a guy who polished, extremely carefully, but he died and they don't trust anyone to do it now. A few companies have been working on machines to do the job, but none have been given approval yet.

At the current rate of increase, you will be able to get an extra apple per kilo in about 10,000 years.
 
This whole thread has a whiff of Charlie Brown's teacher about it!!!!!

(if you know what i mean!!??)
 
My missus has got a molecular biology lecturer that she compares to Charlie Brown's teacher.

Is the *1.8 + 32 conversion for ºC to ºF 100% accurate or is there another conversion for scientific/engineering requirements.
 
Back to temperature, there was an article in the New Scientist that suggested absolute zero was not absolute and that lower temperature could be reached in different environmental conditions, such as in space. Does anyone remember this or can anyone shed more light?
 
Can we talk about boobs or something?? I'm working till 9pm tonight and all this science talk is melting my head!!
 
Back
Top