I got a philips (one L or two
) pair of normal sidelights but they had pale blue glass and looked quite nice but lasted ages, better than the cheap blue glass ones off Ebay 
I got a philips (one L or two) pair of normal sidelights but they had pale blue glass and looked quite nice but lasted ages, better than the cheap blue glass ones off Ebay
![]()
I'm not too keen on those LEDs, think they look terrible on the new Audis, but the are bright and very noticeable!
The reason given by audi for using L.E.D. was they reduced the fuel consumption of DRLs...then some bright spark decided to ask a car company that should know about the effect on fuel consumption, so off they went to volvo who said "no idea...its so small we haven't measured it."So that's the make. I think they give the car a menacing look - but certainly make them stand out from the crowd.
I'd be interested to learn just how much fuel is wasted through using DRLs.
It'd be interesting to know just how much electrical power is produced by an engine at idle - power which, once the battery is fuly charged, is wasted?
At what stage (when switching on electrics) does the amount of fuel consumed start to increase?
2) Car & Driver Magazine in the U.S. said DRLs would increase fuel consumption by about 0.3 to 1.5 mpg.
On an american car thats probably a 10% loss in economy!
Personally, I can't think of anything wrong with that. The more 4X4s that run out of gas on the drive the better. Although some parts of Norway and Sweden are on a similar latitude to the U.K., I was under the impression that large parts of those countries were close to the Arctic Circle and therefore had limited hours of daylight for many months of the year, which makes DLRs quite a sensible move. The U.K. on the otherhand has over 6 months of the year when there are 12 hours of daylight. I know that in summer parts of Scandinavia have almost 24 hours of daylight but nonetheless, I don't want toIf there in a Hummer, they would run out of fuel the instant they turned the lights on![]()
Personally, I can't think of anything wrong with that. The more 4X4s that run out of gas on the drive the better. Although some parts of Norway and Sweden are on a similar latitude to the U.K., I was under the impression that large parts of those countries were close to the Arctic Circle and therefore had limited hours of daylight for many months of the year, which makes DLRs quite a sensible move. The U.K. on the otherhand has over 6 months of the year when there are 12 hours of daylight. I know that in summer parts of Scandinavia have almost 24 hours of daylight but nonetheless, I don't want to
have decisions taken away from me.
Don't forget, with sat nav, GPS and electronic engine management the pieces are all in place to have your speed reduced automatically when you get to a lower speed limit. Put that together with Adaptive Cruise Control then how long before your speed is reduced for you whenever the safety Nazis decide they are going to act in the interests of your own safety. After all, they know best.
Just out of interest, in response to a previous comment, the Norwegians didn't
side with the Germans in WW2, but the Quislings did and assumed the role of a puppet government, just as the Vichy French administration did and just as the British would have done had we been invaded. I think I'm right in saying the King of Norway steadfastly refused to kow-tow to the occupiers and numerous Norwegian naval units came to Britain to carry on the fight as did a lot of aircrew. There was also a very active resistance movement.
I've been thinking about this the last few days when on a particularly nasty long straight which is one of very few places to overtake on a very busy road. It's nigh on impossible to see a car at the other end of the mile-long straight, even in bright sunlight, unless it has sidelights on. Then it stands out like a sore thumb and it's great because you know for sure whether it's safe or nto to overtake. How many of you would put your sidelights on on that stretch of road? If you answered no, I'd probably kill you head-on![]()
I've been thinking about this the last few days when on a particularly nasty long straight which is one of very few places to overtake on a very busy road. It's nigh on impossible to see a car at the other end of the mile-long straight, even in bright sunlight, unless it has sidelights on. Then it stands out like a sore thumb and it's great because you know for sure whether it's safe or nto to overtake. How many of you would put your sidelights on on that stretch of road? If you answered no, I'd probably kill you head-on![]()
My answer would be - should you really be overtaking on a road if you're unsure of something coming the other way?
I aim to be awkward lol
In actual fact i don't overtake on there unless i know it's clear. So it really pisses me off to get to the other end and find out i could have overtaken and then sit behind a useless **** doing 30 for the next 15 miles until you get to the next spot you can overtake. That's if there's no traffic coming the other way there either. See my point now?![]()