About the 100hp bounciness... has anyone driven (ideally, owned) a Cinquecento or Seicento Sporting as well, and could compare the two on standard suspension?
Supercub. I changed my 100HP dampers all round with standards but I don't drive my car to the potential limits it may be capable of. If you look at the Koni Damper Experiment thread you will find that many are using either Koni adjustable Sports or the cheaper Koni "Steet" to replace at least the rear dampers in an attempt to reduce the harsh ride. You might want to look at tyre ratios as well as this also helps.
The prime intention in fitting Konis is to stop the bouncing, especially on the rear end; any gain in comfort is a secondary consideration. You don't mean "standards" as the dampers you've fitted are not standard on the 100HP - you mean "as fitted to petrol-engined 1.1 and 1.2 Pandas" - not sure how many times this has been pointed out.
Mine is due for new tyres soon, so I'll go for 195/50s and report on the change in ride without any suspension changes.
If it is still too hard, I'll go for the rear shock change to Konis.
It is an utterly fantastic little car, ruined by its ride. I find myself taking the A roads instead of the B roads, which defeats the purpose of such a car. A shame, but hopefully easily fixed.
My 100hp ride is now fixed. OversprungWell, I have to say that the ride on my 100hp Panda is transformed as of today. The combination of Dunlop SP Sports all round with a 50 ratio as against the original 45 (has a similar tread pattern to the eagles) and replacing all the shocks with original Fiat equipment as recommended by my friendly garage including Ron (from TV’s Pimp My Ride) and cohort Keith has stopped me ricocheting over bumps & potholes, rattling my fillings when going over rumble strips and generally makes the car more of a joy to drive. As I said in the Koni thread, I was told that shocks fall into two categories, comfort & sport. All Panda’s except the 100hp & 4x4 have the comfort shocks and funnily enough the Koni’s fit the same criteria. I was persuaded to go for OEM comfort as these shocks were designed for the chassis and of course will not cause any mismatch. The original springs have been retained and even before I got the car back one of the mechanics (who does rally driving) had road tested the vehicle to ensure the handling was all OK. Having just done a 50 mile round trip ranging from country side-roads to the A12 motorway I have to say I’m delighted with the new ride. The cost of the original equipment is on par with Koni at £80+vat (£96 each) for the fronts and £60+vat (£72 each) for the rears. Dunlops came in at £58+vat (£69) each less than half the price of similar boots on my VW Eos. Fitting charge £150 included 20 mins trying to get the alloys off the hubs. I’d have been mullered if I had needed to change a wheel. Worth checking yours to make sure they are not seized on the hubs. Alright, cost me a few bob but after a year of ownership it feels like a new car. I would recommend this mod to any 100hp owner who wants a more comfortable ride!
EXACTLY! Fair enough some better dampers to better control the ride, but turning it into a 1.2.....I dunno... I thought 100hp was meant to feel like a little go-kart, don't get why ppl would want to turn it into a bouncy castle.
Had a couple of enquiries as to the part numbers of the original equipment Fiat Shock Absorbers I fitted to improve my ride. Sorry to read that some had problems with the front Koni's. Anyway, after even more miles on my new setup I can say that the ride is still good! The numbers are as follows:
FRONT: 0051857950 REAR: 51870990. I retained the original springs and upped the tyre profile to 50 but it was interesting to read that one member has not just replaced all shockers but used 1.2 springs as well. He reported that the ride was transformed and he is well pleased. Improving the ride seems a growing trend for us 100HP owners!
I dunno... I thought 100hp was meant to feel like a little go-kart, don't get why ppl would want to turn it into a bouncy castle.