does it not say guilty pleas only will be heard on this date? they will always set another date if pleading not guilty as they will have to get all their witness and stuff together
does it not say guilty pleas only will be heard on this date? they will always set another date if pleading not guilty as they will have to get all their witness and stuff together
looks like you stuffed then unless your solisitor can sort it so you just go to see magistrate, not actually in the court but a room out the back where you swear an affidavit that you was not the one using the car, an then they drop the charge.
i did this once when i sold a car that new owner left on double yellow lines for months, car was still registered to me so i got loads of fines. was in old days when new keeper was the one that had to tell dvla they had bought the car
have you spoke to garage yet? they may have been using it on trade plates so its covered to not be taxed
if i got arrested for shop lifting and fined that mean i can then go shoplift some more because i already paid the fine to be able to do it?
if you got caught twice on the same day you could get away with it, but not the next day, surprised they didn't make you rip them off there and then
Sorry jenks, took my eye off the ball for a while. Have you asked the garage if they've used the van while they had it? What is the form the PCSO has filled in? Surely, if the van was taken to a garage by your Dad, with your Mum following behind you can use them as witnesses. They may in theory be considered to be biased, but nontheless they should have a certain amount of credibility before the Beak.Yes I have spoken to the garage collecting van friday afternoon, will get more info then.
If you got stopped a second (or third) time, much would depend on the circumstances of the subsequent stops.Ok then, today I got done for my window tints (not a prob I knew they were wrong and so its my fault for not being botherd to remove them for the last 1.5 years).
So now I have a fixed penalty notice which as has allready been said is just an admitance of guilt and an agreement to settle out of court.
So nows the bit that I contemplating and wondering what you think. As I have already been prosecuted for this offence I cant be prosecuted for it again, i.e I am still committing the same offence as I was as I havnt removed the tints. Therefore if I get pulled over again I should be able to show them that I have allready been fined for this and they then cant do me for it again.
Edit: I am removing my tints just thought I might get some interesting theories going on this.
Whats a VDRS?
What type of tester do they have for that?he gave me a fixed penalty then went 200yards down the road and pulled over somebody else with window tints, think he may have been given a target for them, especially as he had the tester on the passenger seat.
What type of tester do they have for that?
he gave me a fixed penalty then went 200yards down the road and pulled over somebody else with window tints, think he may have been given a target for them, especially as he had the tester on the passenger seat.