Coronavirus - The Thread :(

Currently reading:
Coronavirus - The Thread :(

Just like the flu, or should I say influenza, aids, cancer. swine flu, bird flu, sars?.

Not really just like though is it, there is a vaccine for flu, aids is avoidable and these days very treatable if some one does get it. you cant catch cancer. i don't personally know anyone who has family members who have had the last 3 but i have 2 people on my facebook friends list with family in hospital at this very moment with covid 19. and i only have 106 people on my friends list so not very good odds.
So no its not just like at all is it.

Its probably more just like Spanish flu (that originated in the US) and lasted 2 years and killed 50 million people.
 
Last edited:
Somewhere much earlier in this thread I mentioned that viruses do not want to kill their host, as that stops the spread. Covid, being new to humans is a bit fierce, and killing some hosts.
Saw a YouTube vid a few days ago, a German doctor and virologist saying they had seen evidence of some infections being milder, and the covid strain having mutated to have a lesser effect on humans. So that at least is a chink of light at the end of a long tunnel.
 
Not sure on that one, although the low rate of mortality is a good thing.
Even here, the rate is as low as 2 out of a population of 13,000
and I am sure there are some remote locations with zero mortality due to Covid.

Well it’s using data from the office of national statistics, my guess is they are looking at only cities as obviously there will be many little towns or villages that have not had deaths, it was the independent so feel free to go and look it up
 
Last edited:
I am not going to look it up because the figures are sad enough and its not a competition.
I just think reporters should be careful what they print, which could lead to over confidence regarding isolation and social distancing.
Already people are thinking the lockdown is going to end on Sunday due to the government saying they will make slight changes to the requirements. It is a most dangerous time.
 
The surgical gowns from Turkey have not been used as don't meet British standard. surely someone should have checked that before ordering a plane load :bang:
I would have thought if not surgical standard they can be used for some thing else, must be better than just a plastic apron? If a local rotary club has banded together people to make scrubs out of old sheets, these must be able to re assigned to another use
 
Last edited:
Norfolk folk tend to keep 'theirselves to theirselves' at the best of times: the sociable ones are the incomers.....:D
I've been to Norwich a few times. Lovely place and great pubs. Love the Walnut Tree Shades. A real "rough and ready" pub like we used to have in Peterborough in the 80s
 
I am not going to look it up because the figures are sad enough and its not a competition.

Why question it if you have no intention of checking the facts? It’s got nothing to do with it being a competition, you stated that you doubted the information.

If you said “I’ve bought a white car” and I said “I doubt you have” and you posted a picture of it, I’d look like a complete loon if I said “no I’m not going to look at your picture because there are so many colours in the world, I don’t want to limit myself to looking at a white car only and also it’s not a competition”

This is the problem with the world right now, people seem to love to doubt the verifiable facts but don’t want to look into anything themselves.
 
Why question it if you have no intention of checking the facts? It’s got nothing to do with it being a competition, you stated that you doubted the information.

If you said “I’ve bought a white car” and I said “I doubt you have” and you posted a picture of it, I’d look like a complete loon if I said “no I’m not going to look at your picture because there are so many colours in the world, I don’t want to limit myself to looking at a white car only and also it’s not a competition”

This is the problem with the world right now, people seem to love to doubt the verifiable facts but don’t want to look into anything themselves.

Stop being and ARSE, you obviously havn't got anything better to do. I don't doubt the figures just saying it is not the least infected area in the country, (read my post properly) making that kind of statement is Dangerous as people will feel that they no longer need to social distance or isolate, the press shouldn't post such nonsense.
 
Stop being and ARSE, you obviously havn't got anything better to do. I don't doubt the figures just saying it is not the least infected area in the country, (read my post properly) making that kind of statement is Dangerous as people will feel that they no longer need to social distance or isolate, the press shouldn't post such nonsense.

:confused: Stop being an arse ??

You did doubt the figures it’s posted by you on the previous page, but just in case you forgot

attachment.php


You also say “I don’t doubt the figures” but then go on to post “the press shouldn’t post such nonsense”, which again would imply you don’t think the information accurate?

As for complaints over how people might view the information and that they may decide to not isolate or social distance, the only people likely to think that are the ones already flouting they rules or who didn’t bother to read the article. Speaking of which the story is not about infection rates it is specifically about having the lowest rate of deaths. Having read your posts properly you literally said nothing of the sort about it not being the least “infected” area.

Why even comment in the first place if you’re only going say you doubt it and then refuse to back up what you’re saying? Who’s being the arse ?

We are also literally on the eve of the restrictions being loosened, On a hot sunny bank holiday weekend. You don’t think that might have more of an impact on people actions when it comes to self isolation and social distancing? :rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • 698189BE-E45E-4D7A-BE7C-9431E7708E15.jpeg
    698189BE-E45E-4D7A-BE7C-9431E7708E15.jpeg
    506.3 KB · Views: 6,591
Last edited:
To add to the comparable figures issue, there have been some studies performed of the virus genomes since the outbreak.

Reports of one study suggest the virus has mutated from the original Wuhan one and may have become more infectious.

It is suggested that the original Wuhan virus, D614 has been overtaken by it's mutated version, D614G since around February.

This mutation is argued to have seen a development in it's "accessory proteins", (the Spikes) the part that helps it invade a hosts cells and evade the immune system.

If true, that might explain why countries that have developed outbreaks later on have suffered more.

On a similar track there is another study that has thought to have mapped a "Deleterious Mutation" in one mutation.
They suggest they have found a mutation of the virus that has lost some pairs of genes that make up these accessory proteins and that has made the virus "less fit".

I'm no virus expert, but I do understand how a virus invades, replicates and spreads and it's not uncommon for a virus to both neutrally mutate (unharmful to the virus) and deleteriously mutate (which damages it).

The act of a virus replication can cause it to make mistakes as it replicates, which is why some viruses peter out.
As it seems to replicate really fast, it wouldn't be beyond imagination to see it mutate very quickly, perhaps to a less harmful one that a body can mount a timely response to without being over come.

So if this is all true, this mutation of virus has lost (deleted) part of it's self that helps it invade a host and evade their immune system. As it lost them as part of it's hurried self replication, it's hard to imagine how it could reacquire them.

The studies aren't yet published only reported on what they have released so far, but are by teams from Los Alamos National Laboratory and Arizona State University if anyone fancies a bit of a read.
 
Last edited:
:confused: Stop being an arse ??

You did doubt the figures it’s posted by you on the previous page, but just in case you forgot

attachment.php


You also say “I don’t doubt the figures” but then go on to post “the press shouldn’t post such nonsense”, which again would imply you don’t think the information accurate?

As for complaints over how people might view the information and that they may decide to not isolate or social distance, the only people likely to think that are the ones already flouting they rules or who didn’t bother to read the article. Speaking of which the story is not about infection rates it is specifically about having the lowest rate of deaths. Having read your posts properly you literally said nothing of the sort about it not being the least “infected” area.

Why even comment in the first place if you’re only going say you doubt it and then refuse to back up what you’re saying? Who’s being the arse ?

We are also literally on the eve of the restrictions being loosened, On a hot sunny bank holiday weekend. You don’t think that might have more of an impact on people actions when it comes to self isolation and social distancing? :rolleyes:
What don't you understand by I DON'T DOUBT the figures'?
BUT PUBLISHING THIS INFORMATION IS DANGEROUS :bang: :mad:
with this information and the bank holiday (why are we still having them?)and potential for easing of the lockdown will give a false sense of security and that second dreaded wave will happen, if you want figures then Norfolk has
1773 cases, Dorset has 340
 
On a similar track there is another study that has thought to have mapped a "Deleterious Mutation" in one mutation.
They suggest they have found a mutation of the virus that has lost some pairs of genes that make up these accessory proteins and that has made the virus "less fit".

That seems to be along the lines of the report I saw yesterday from Germany that they were finding a weaker strain that affected us less.

Brings a little hope.
 
Back
Top