What's made you smile today?

Currently reading:
What's made you smile today?

3 Pandas all now clean inside, just my leather bits to treat. Comparing Noop to the others it actually looks like the gear lever gaiter and wheel are actually leather. Still not entirely convinced the Italians know what leather is. lol I had not realised how far I had let poor old noop go.
 
Advice from tge AA. Dont forget the chicken wire! Ha ha ha ha ha and LOL
You can tell this is old...

Current advice is to layer your chicken wire and fibreglass horizontally then vertically similar to reinforced concrete. Fill all voids with filler and expanding foam. Sand and finish with a rattle can.

If done correctly the strength is similar to Chobham armour...this is of course frowned upon as in an accident it's considered unfair to the vehicle being hit.
 
Last edited:
I also like it where it has the pictures of the carburetors & other parts which open up so you can see the inside of the parts
It was all so lovely and simple!


Also unreliable and prone to problems like fuel starvation if you wanted a lot of power when cornering hard. That used to irk me.
 
The joys of SUV styling...without the SUV
1000013350.jpg

Someones paint...work carpark fun.

1000013351.jpg


That was difficult..
 
I got a phone call to say my new car is ready after a fresh MOT this morning which has no advisories 😁 & 4 new tyres fitted so have to arrange a time/day to collect it, then get Luigi out the building after a quick clean & emptying stuff out of it, I don't suppose anyone here knows where I can get hold of a clutch quadrant for a Cinquecento/Seicento anywhere as I thought I would get a spare because they are common for breaking from past experience with Cinquecento's but they seem to be unobtainable nowadays
 
Your tyres are a dramatic illustration of the difference in rubber compound used in the tread rubber and casing rubber. The join between the two is vividly obvious!

Is this a polite way of putting that you can only see half of the word Goodyear due to my wife parking by sense of touch?

😉
 
Last edited:
@Pugglt Auld Jock

An interesting documentary on thunder city who are the only people still operating the lightning,



The UK CAA don’t like people privately owning Mach 2+ aircraft so they all ended up in South Africa in thunder city with the largest collection of privately owned jets that have a squadron of aircraft bigger than some airforces
 
@Pugglt Auld Jock

An interesting documentary on thunder city who are the only people still operating the lightning,



The UK CAA don’t like people privately owning Mach 2+ aircraft so they all ended up in South Africa in thunder city with the largest collection of privately owned jets that have a squadron of aircraft bigger than some airforces

A testimony of the skill of British Designers and engineers, yet again ruined by bureaucracy.:(
 
yet again ruined by bureaucracy.:(
Realistically its not hard to understand why the government are not big fans of civilians owning such powerful and fast aircraft, you actually need special training to fly aircraft capable of exceeding the speed of sound a lot of things change once you start going that quick, they can also fly higher and faster than commercial flights making them a potential hazard to commercial aviation.

What I don't understand though, is if the government can find the battle of Briton memorial flight with the associated costs of running a Lancaster, spit fires and hurricanes, why can we not officially sanction specific aircraft with specific oversight from official bodies to keep the likes of the lightning, Vulcan, buccaneer, harrier etc, flying specifically for flight displays and memorial purposes.

There are many people who would love to see a lightning flying over Buckingham palace for official events as would like to see an old spitfire of which there are many still flying.

I have seen some of the info on how the CAA manipulate things to rule out civilians being able to to own and operate these types of aircraft its all very petty and has a lot of rules and regulations like you would expect in formula 1 for the size of the rudder if the aircraft is able to exceed Mach 1 and the required number of redundancies for things like the flight controls which cannot retrofit to old aircraft like these, making them able to easily exclude fast jets without affecting normal general aviation.
 
Is it not just sheer complexity and metal fatigue?

The Lancaster and Spitfire are knife and fork tech and not particularly highly stressed how the BBMF use them. Tend to fly low impact displays with very little aerobatics to conserve the aircraft.

The RAF had a job keeping the lightning in service in period as they weren't the most reliable of things and they were withdrawn due to crashes caused by technical issues and fatigue if memory serves rather than being no longer useful.

Finding bits for them now will be needle in a haystack stuff and the amount of damage you could do with one is large if all was to go wrong. Most of the ex-raf service aircraft are also hardly one careful owner...they will have been de-mobbed because they were knackered, had fatigue cracks etc etc.

Even to get a sea vixen flying was ridiculous and that wasn't super sonic.

Also they don't like you owning something that they couldn't intercept 😉
 
Is it not just sheer complexity and metal fatigue?

If you watch the video above, the official reason was it was considered a "complex aircraft" except it was designed in the 50s when the total sum of complexity was cables to the control surfaces and two jet engines of which there are many privately owned jets so it no more complex than any other jet in private ownership.

Talking about complexity, the Vulcan managed to get an exception the the Complex aircraft rules despite being many times larger with twice the number of engines needing 3 times the crew to fly it and being considerably larger and more prone to metal fatigue.


The Lancaster and Spitfire are knife and fork tech and not particularly highly stressed how the BBMF use them. Tend to fly low impact displays with very little aerobatics to conserve the aircraft.
Spitfires are regularly used in aerobatics, as is the P51, they even race them in the states, so there is no low impact flying for many of them.

The RAF had a job keeping the lightning in service in period as they weren't the most reliable of things and they were withdrawn due to crashes caused by technical issues and fatigue if memory serves rather than being no longer useful.
Like anything built in the 50s and 60s they were not fool proof and advanced for their time, they were also like nothing else at that time so of course they lost more than say a modern aircraft today, but when you look at the number of accidents in General aviation the numbers of cessnas that crash is probably many times higher.

all that being said they were in service for nearly 30 years and that is comparable with the likes of the Jaguar and the Tornado.
the amount of damage you could do with one is large if all was to go wrong. Most of the ex-raf service aircraft are also hardly one careful owner...they will have been de-mobbed because they were knackered, had fatigue cracks etc etc.
again nothing is fool proof and the spitfire that crashed just a couple of weeks back proves that. The Lancaster would probably do a lot more damage than a lightning, but then again the Lancaster cannot go a quick. a lot of the issues boil down to just how fast the aircraft could go and not wanting civilians to have aircraft that could technically out run and out climb the current line up of RAF jets and this is really what it all boils down to.
 
I think you underestimate how complex 1950s tech can be...

Fault finding on this bad boy...rather you than me.

1000013363.jpg


There will be literally hundreds of miles of wires behind that..all 50 years old, and transistors and valves. I'd put money on their being more components in the electrical system of an old aircraft than a modern digital era one.

Then of course you get to the pressure hull which has a limited service life regardless while older aircraft as long as the wing spars etc are not stressed can live a very long time indeed.

While technically they can out run an RAF interceptor...they can't outrun a missile it's not really a concern I'd imagine other than the optics of shooting down a civilian for being an idiot.
 
Last edited:
I've always view those cockpits as overkill, as in so much can go wrong therefore we need to see it all. I suspect 90% of that is never needed if there are no issues
 
Back
Top