The simplicity was certainly a reason the older ones used to drive marinas, plus the dealership had turned from BL to Fiat and some of the more mid age had come from a fiat dealership which changed to BL and they, predominantly, drove Fiats!
Oh yes, the wee rear engine'd Skodas, subject of much unwarranted mirth! During the period when I was a trainer students would often turn up in them as they could be bought cheaply. In my opinion an ideal car for a student of car repair and maintenance to own. There wasn't basically much wrong with them but they did need constant care and "fettling" in daily use. I developed quite a liking for them back in those days - but I've always been drawn to hopeless cases!The worst I’ve driven in the snow are the Regatta and Transit…the stopgap car I had, wehn I took myself back to Uni wehn I was in my thirties, was a Skoda Rapide which was surprisingly a whole load of fun in any conditions
Mine was pretty reliable, though it had a tendency to seep from the crankshaft oil seal, I gave up after changing it twice! The carb was a pain to set up as, I think with bad/basic manufacturing, no matter how little you turned and adjustment, it was either MORE or LESS, which was odd as it was a Webber, but once set, it was a dreamOh yes, the wee rear engine'd Skodas, subject of much unwarranted mirth! During the period when I was a trainer students would often turn up in them as they could be bought cheaply. In my opinion an ideal car for a student of car repair and maintenance to own. There wasn't basically much wrong with them but they did need constant care and "fettling" in daily use. I developed quite a liking for them back in those days - but I've always been drawn to hopeless cases!
It sounds very familar, I bought a Iveco Daily LWB with a snapped cambelt from auction, a local farmer friend I bought my sacks of excellent spuds(now longer available) let me park it in his yard , remove engine which I rebuilt with s/h conrod, new bearings, piston rings , honed the bores and if memory serves me right fitted a 2.5 head on the 2.8 enginein fact we even had a couple of local farmers who would let you make running repairs to the ditched car in their workshop.
Nowadays most of the farms seem to be owned by big companies, and they don't (or can't) help in any way.
From memory didn't some of them have a reverse "scroll" on the crank with the theory it would rewind the oil back into the engine rather than leak oil,which it still did?Mine was pretty reliable, though it had a tendency to seep from the crankshaft oil seal, I gave up after changing it twice!
Our top field was planted out every second year with potatoes which the farmer next door came in and lifted for us then bagged them up and delivered them back for us to sell on. There were always bags of potatoes in the potting sheds waiting to sell on to the shops in town - so heavy that I, as a young lad, couldn't really lift them. Our Gardener/estate worker took great pleasure in ragging me mercilessly about what a wimp I was as he was merrily chucking half hundred weight bags around - I would have been about 10 years old!Can you still buy spuds in sacks? Mind you, the rate I use them, they'd be well off by the time I got halfway down.
The Austin Maxi was always reasonable in the snow, even better if a sack of spuds was sat on the front subframe under the bonnet. There was room, although they tended to cook. The HL twin carb model had fatter tyres, and was not so good.
I remember the DAFs being quite good, as the transmission tended to change up until slippage stopped, and before the 66, they all effectively had a LSD.
That…I can’t rememberFrom memory didn't some of them have a reverse "scroll" on the crank with the theory it would rewind the oil back into the engine rather than leak oil,which it still did?
You had me doubting my memory for a minute, until I went on an Imp site.That…I can’t remember
As for the first ‘true’ hatchback, there are lots of competing marques for that one, some getting as petty as ‘it may have opened like a hatchback, but it was on stays not gas lifts so doesn’t qualify’
Yes, that little Saab engine was a blinder!Don't know about the DKW Munga, but the Wartburgs I used to work on in the 70s with a water cooled 3 cylinder two stroke engine and oil mix in the tank, later had a VW Golf type engine due to emission laws. The original three cylinder two stroke Saab used to rally I recall with great success.
Very fond memories of standing in Cardrona Forest many years ago - before Mrs J took up most of my spare time - listening to one of those SAABs screaming towards us, flashing past in a hail of small stones and disappearing into the trees again. Such happy carefree days! Compared to many others of the time they looked quite narrow and high and looked as if they should roll on the first corner!Don't know about the DKW Munga, but the Wartburgs I used to work on in the 70s with a water cooled 3 cylinder two stroke engine and oil mix in the tank, later had a VW Golf type engine due to emission laws. The original three cylinder two stroke Saab used to rally I recall with great success.
There are still a few very potent Imps around the hillclimbing scene. Do you notice where the thermostat is mounted? The engine went into the back of the car flywheel facing forward - like the beetle - and that thermostat housing was tucked up against the rear bulkhead. quite difficult to get at and a real sod if one of the studs snapped off. Much easier on the estate/van version with it's access hatch in the load floor. I've built a number of these and their big failing was that they had cast iron liners which were integrated into the aluminium block casting when it was cast. The top of the liner was just below the deck face of the block so the head gasket sealed against the aluminium not the steel of the liner itself. If the engine overheated seriously - and they were a bit prone to doing this - then the liners would move slightly and/or the aluminium around the top of the liner would degrade and from that moment on it wasn't worth trying to reuse that block. The real "screamers" (getting 7 to 8,000 rpm out of them was quite doable) were usually Wills Ringed.You had me doubting my memory for a minute, until I went on an Imp site.
I remember we had one in workshop trying to reduce oil past the rear "seal" and tried to improve it's crankcase breathing as we felt it was pressurising due to blow by pushing the oil out.
"Swapping your Imp engine for a new Sunbeam B1 one is reputed to have advantages:
- Better oil sealing due to a rear crank seal, as opposed to the Imp's (inefficient) oil return scroll."
- View attachment 432357
Late 70s was the last time I worked on them and have done thermostats, as you say not the easiest job.Do you notice where the thermostat is mounted? The engine went into the back of the car flywheel facing forward - like the beetle - and that thermostat housing was tucked up against the rear bulkhead. quite difficult to get at and a real sod if one of the studs snapped off. Much easier on the estate/van version with it's access hatch in the load floor.
They still do quite well in competition, especially the space framed "monsters", and sound great!
Back in my Firestone days there were often some quite indecently quick Renault 8's to be seen amongst the enthusiasts when we were down at Le Castellet - Circuit Paul Ricard. The negative camber on the rear wheels had to be seen to be believed.but in fairness if I wanted a nippy rear engine, rear wheel drive a Renault 8 or 10, I did have two of the 10s, but fancied a tuned up 8 after seeing them in the streets of the South of France around 1978 in the boy racer scene, a bit like our Fords and Minis were. Easy to work on, I did an engine swap in my dinner hour.![]()
I had an Estelle and concur it was much more than its reputation suggested. Some suprising good engineering touches. Needed fettling to keep it sweet but no other issues and dirt cheap parts.Oh yes, the wee rear engine'd Skodas, subject of much unwarranted mirth! During the period when I was a trainer students would often turn up in them as they could be bought cheaply. In my opinion an ideal car for a student of car repair and maintenance to own. There wasn't basically much wrong with them but they did need constant care and "fettling" in daily use. I developed quite a liking for them back in those days - but I've always been drawn to hopeless cases!
Edit. The Imps, with which I became completely obsessed later on, were an excellent car in the snow - even if they did tend to want to go straight on!
Clearly you need to eat far more chips.Can you still buy spuds in sacks? Mind you, the rate I use them, they'd be well off by the time I got halfway down.
The Austin Maxi was always reasonable in the snow, even better if a sack of spuds was sat on the front subframe under the bonnet. There was room, although they tended to cook. The HL twin carb model had fatter tyres, and was not so good.
I remember the DAFs being quite good, as the transmission tended to change up until slippage stopped, and before the 66, they all effectively had a LSD.