Came up with this idea ?
Nest time engage the grey matter first !!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8642404.stm
Nest time engage the grey matter first !!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8642404.stm
Pope Benedict branded condoms. Guaranteed to never give you an erection outside marriage.
The Bishop of Nottingham said, if anything, it was "appalling manners".
I would buy those, pope has never had sex so condoms carrying his name means you can never get a girl pregnant... right?
never had sex? SERIOUS!!!!![]()
And fondling kids then covering it up isn't? Preaching against condoms isn't? Come on. I think if we're going to allow him here there shouldn't be any official ceremony or recognition. If he wants to come then fine, let him come and let those that want to see him see him. We have no need to make an official visit out of this. Do we welcome radical clerics in the same way?
There's an argument that had priests been allowed to marry, there may have been less chance of that happening. I'm also not quite sure how they are going to advise young couples on married life if they've never had a relationship with any women other than mothers, sisters and housekeepers.never had sex? SERIOUS!!!!![]()
A fatwa decreed on the entire Foreign Office. Hmm. Perhaps they could extend that to the Cabinet.i would love to see how the other extremists would react to such suggestions
My theory is that virtually all religions rely on poverty to one extent or another. People in poverty tend to believe in various religions and having a large amount of children is one sure way into poverty. Unless of course you're Francis Rossi who has 8 kids but can easily afford to look after them.And fondling kids then covering it up isn't? Preaching against condoms isn't? Come on. I think if we're going to allow him here there shouldn't be any official ceremony or recognition. If he wants to come then fine, let him come and let those that want to see him see him. We have no need to make an official visit out of this. Do we welcome radical clerics in the same way?
each child is reckoned to cost 1 million pounds to raise.My theory is that virtually all religions rely on poverty to one extent or another. People in poverty tend to believe in various religions and having a large amount of children is one sure way into poverty. Unless of course you're Francis Rossi who has 8 kids but can easily afford to look after them.
As races and nationalities have become better educated they have tended to move away from God (of whichever variety) and towards financial security and materialism.
If Catholics don't practice birth control and have large amounts of children, then it is pretty certain they will have less spare money and therefore have greater chance of being in poverty. Traditionally this meant people moved closer to religion.
Is it the cynic in me that thinks this is the reason behind the Catholic Church's resistance to contraception?
But then they are not alone. Other religions also rely on poverty to bring people in, or closer still to their particular faith.
HOW MUCH? I haven't got any.....so where's my £2.4 million gone then? It must have gone to support all those kids the dolies have had.each child is reckoned to cost 1 million pounds to raise.
each child is reckoned to cost 1 million pounds to raise.