wotnowarninglight
Member
From experience with Skoda Favorit's the bottom suspension cup on the front struts was a corrosion weak spot. Later struts were modified and had 2 holes drilled through the bottom cup to let residue/water drain out. Due to a bump I had 1 modified strut and 1 original, I had intended to modify the the original to match but never got round to it. Don't think it was a recall issue but my point is that car was 9-10 years old before the MOT man took exception to the corrosion on the original non modified strut.
Perhaps Fiat's reasoning is that, as the bottom of the front struts is where the springs are most vunerable due to them being thinner at this point and this is where gravity will deposit the corrosion inducing silt residue / water so that this is the way to go in terms of a solution. They possibly also figure that it may take years for corrosion to significantly weaken the spring to the point where they do break, so they have hedged their bets with the spring cups devices like I have fitted post recall, rather than endure the vast expense of replacing the front springs. Think that FIAT are playing the probability game...
As folk have deduced from posts so far and the chassis nos. this must affect the bulk of Stilos manufactured to date.
Perhaps Fiat's reasoning is that, as the bottom of the front struts is where the springs are most vunerable due to them being thinner at this point and this is where gravity will deposit the corrosion inducing silt residue / water so that this is the way to go in terms of a solution. They possibly also figure that it may take years for corrosion to significantly weaken the spring to the point where they do break, so they have hedged their bets with the spring cups devices like I have fitted post recall, rather than endure the vast expense of replacing the front springs. Think that FIAT are playing the probability game...
As folk have deduced from posts so far and the chassis nos. this must affect the bulk of Stilos manufactured to date.
Last edited: