Potential increase to speed fines!

Currently reading:
Potential increase to speed fines!

over the Allocated speed limits dependant on area?

So say in a 30 - the 10% is 33
Some area allow +2mph so from 36 - £10 37-£20? you mean?

I think they should not hit drivers hard when slightly over like - 35 in a 30 - £60

But doing say 40 in a 30 - £75

41+ in a 30 = £100

Ziggy

Yeah but I think it should start at the 10% mark, so 34 - £10, 35 - £20, 35 - £30...

Dom
 
:eek:
I think baseing Road Duty on Co2 output is a farce. Look at some of the harmful crap other than Co2 that comes out a lot of dirty diesels? Yet they emit low Co2 and as a result are low tax.

Should be looking at nox and particulates!

Dont give them ideas!!!!!! It will make it even more confusing as well as there is no need for another reason to tax motorists :(

Ps dave, get an AGP, £165 a yr for me as well, but loads more POWER!!!:slayer::devil:
 
Just looks like a way for them to make more money, always is.

Don't speeed i suppose and your set.
 
thought this thread was about speeding fines not road tax :confused:

im on the fence about this as well, as a person with 3 points on my license i will happily say that a £60 fine is enough.

but surely, and it is to me, that the increase should be seenas more of a deterant to speeding.

but in my books;
theres a time and a place for speeding. your doing something wrong if your getting caught.

p.s. stop moaning about road tax.. the Astra is £210 per year :cry:
 
Last edited:
ah she has a 16v, buggers shouldnt charge more for extra valves :mad:

Emissions based as mentioned above :(

People seem to forget driving is a privilege, not a right. She made a choice to take that job, knowing that she would have to drive as she couldn't get the bus, therefore, she'll have to pay to road tax. Either that, or get a cheaper car to road tax.

It's all well and good saying that but if you see the crap public transport in places like where Dave and I live it's either drive and have a job or don't drive, don't have a job and live off the state.

Driving being a luxury is something that realistically only applies to those who don't need a car for work (students etc, yes I was one once!).

over the Allocated speed limits dependant on area?

So say in a 30 - the 10% is 33
Some area allow +2mph so from 36 - £10 37-£20? you mean?

I think they should not hit drivers hard when slightly over like - 35 in a 30 - £60

But doing say 40 in a 30 - £75

41+ in a 30 = £100

Ziggy

There is no Allocated limit, its only advisory and doesn't have to be followed ;)
 
From the article:

“The current levels have fallen behind other fixed penalties and therefore risk trivialising the offences.
No, the offence still carries 3 points. It's not just the money, it's the quarter of your permission to drive being carved off that makes it a reasonable penalty.

If they were proposing no points and £150 per offense then I'd agree it would be trivialising it.
 
From the article:

No, the offence still carries 3 points. It's not just the money, it's the quarter of your permission to drive being carved off that makes it a reasonable penalty.

If they were proposing no points and £150 per offense then I'd agree it would be trivialising it.

Exactly. The points are meant to be a deterrent. To increase the effectiveness regarding younger drivers, a probationary period was introduced. I see upping the fines as just another way to cream money out of motorists, and calling it a speeding deterrent is a very thin veil.
As for the 'driving is a privilege not a right' brigade - yes that's true,
but it's not as simple as that in the real world as MEP rightly said. To be honest I wish I didn't have to drive at all because of the costs and having to dodge the morons who see every B-road as a test track. But if I didn't drive I wouldn't be able to go to uni or take my kids to nursery etc etc.
 
To be brutally honest, £60 is sweet FA. However, the true cost is in the rising insurance, an SP30 will put up the driver's insurance premium for the next 5 years, and in most cases will cause them to be £500-£1000 further out of pocket. It's definitely just a way to get cash out of motorists, because anyone with half a brain knows that the points are enough of a deterrent.

As for road tax, you should all go to the MOT garage that my mate went to, 3 mechanics were baffled how his emissions came out as 0, despite putting a 'large rip in centre silencer' down as an advisory.. :chin: No joke, he actually had his MOT form with emissions - 0 written on it. I told him to send it off to the DVLA to claim his road tax back! :p
 
An SP30 isn't likly to increase your insurance by £100 a year, mine was only £25-30 a year. It's not nessecarily the points, it's the offence code that increases insurance substantially depending upon what it is. Ie 3 points for jumping a red will see a substantial increase over an SP30.

Just tried a quote on confused.com with an SP30 and without, puts mine up £149 a year exactly. Guess everyone's different.
 
After trying to achieve a new land speed record in my mjet down the motorway and getting caught.

I think 3 points and £60 is enough.
Government just needs more money because they keep throwing ours away.
 
After trying to achieve a new land speed record in my mjet down the motorway and getting caught.

I think 3 points and £60 is enough.
Government just needs more money because they keep throwing ours away.

Clearly its not enough as so many people still speed (myself included).

If you don't want to pay the fine, don't speed (or, don't get caught).
 
Back
Top