Mixing Brake Fluid

Currently reading:
Mixing Brake Fluid

Wrong, DOT 3 is not obsolete at all.
In fact, lots of car/ bikes are designed to use only DOT 3....
Lots of American cars and bikes, way into the nineties, use ONLY DOT 3 fluid.
Any decent part shop can get quality DOT 3 brake fluid for you, no problem.
And yes, you can mix it with DOT 4, but as this is a complete different product, I wouldn't recommend it.
By no way DOT 4 is a better quality over DOT 3, again, it's just a different product.
 
Last edited:
Wrong, DOT 3 is not obsolete at all.
In fact, lots of car/ bikes are designed to use only DOT 3....
Lots of American cars and bikes, way into the nineties, use ONLY DOT 3 fluid.

You pretty much make my point for me. It may be absolutely the right stuff for a P 47 Thunderbolt, or a Harley designed in the 1930s, or even a hemi charger. But it has no place whatsoever in a modern European vehicle. And in almost all cases (only a few chumps at Toyota seem to be holding out on this) DOT 4 can be used as a straight substitute.

By no way DOT 4 is a better quality over DOT 3, again, it's just a different product.

Well, the DOT bit refers to the US Department of Transport. By DOT specifications, DOT4 must have a boiling point 25 degrees C higher than DOT 3 (dry) and 15 degrees higher wet. It would seem perverse in the extreme to argue that DOT 4 was not of better quality.
 
Again, common disbelieve, a higher boilingpoint doesn't mean higher quality.
It IS a complete different product.
To achieve that higher boilingpoint, DOT 4 has a higher viscosity, meaning it is "thicker" so it will flow less easy compared to DOT 3.
If a brake system is designed for DOT 3, it will work best with the least "thick" fluid= DOT 3, and you MAY get problems with DOT 4 or higher ( DOT 5.1, don't use DOT 5, as this is silicon based, and will NOT mix.....!!)
Almost all fast European cars into the eighties run on DOT 3....!!
 
Again, common disbelieve, a higher boilingpoint doesn't mean higher quality.

It means a higher specification, by definition. A product which will work in more extreme circumstances. If this doesn't mean "higher quality", I'm a dutchman.
It IS a complete different product.

Completely is over-egging it. The silicone fluids are "completely" different. DOT 3 has a similar composition/chemical make up to DOT 4.
 
It means a higher specification, by definition. A product which will work in more extreme circumstances. If this doesn't mean "higher quality", I'm a dutchman.Completely is over-egging it. The silicone fluids are "completely" different. DOT 3 has a similar composition/chemical make up to DOT 4.

Peter Pick-up actually is... :p
 
It means a higher specification, by definition. A product which will work in more extreme circumstances. If this doesn't mean "higher quality", I'm a dutchman.


Completely is over-egging it. The silicone fluids are "completely" different. DOT 3 has a similar composition/chemical make up to DOT 4.

I'm very sorry, but you are wrong again.
DOT 3 is chemically totally different from DOT 4, altough they can be mixed.
In practice one wouldn't notice any difference, but I wouldn't use DOT 4 in a track car, with a brake system designed for DOT 3 fluid, like f.i. most Ferrari's from the eighties. ...
But again, for a car in normal everyday road use, it wouldn't matter at all...
I own, among others, an '85 Alfa Romeo GTV-6, and I use ONLY DOT 3 brake fluid in that car, I also own a '88 Pontiac Firebird Formula 350, and again, ONLY DOT 3 in that vehicle.
But I do use DOT 4 in My Ducati motorcycle, and the Fiat Palio as well, I change it every two years in all vehicles...!!
 
Because they were not designed for DOT 5.1......!!!
I like to try and test F.I. better quality oils, tires, exhausts etc. but I just stick to what the manufacturer tells me to use in my brake systems, as they are one of the most important ( safety) parts of the vehicle.
 
I think I've always used DOT 4 in my Ducatis, though I suspect DOT 3 was recommended for the bevel twins. I know people who raced with silicone DOT 5 in BOTT without ill effects.

My conclusion -- in 98% -- or more -- of cases, moving to a later DOT will be fine (although care should be taken with silicones).

Do manufacturer's design with a particular fluid in mind, or simply test with a given fluid? I'm inclined to believe the latter. And snotty enough to believe I can do my own testing.

Peter Pick-up actually is...
:bang: Some of us here can still understand irony. We're a dying breed, but............:bang:
 
Depends on the way you look at it.
Technically spoken the Mille was the best bevel twin engine, the most reliable etc.
Altough the chassis was bad.
I have convert mine to a 900SS Verllichi chromo competition chassis, together with an aluminum box section Verllichi rear swingarm and a Marzochi M1R 42mm front fork.....!!
 
Last edited:
One I really lust after is the Supermono. I only ever saw one (broke lap record at Mallory Park, finished 2nd after a bad start and the race stopped early after an accident). Gorgeous little bike, and, although Bordi and Domenicali designed it, it's said that Taglioni was wandering about the shop, saw a rough sketch, and suggested the counterbalancing conrod. (But this may just have been a kindness.)

I feel the need for another Duke, so may go after a 748 -- they're fairly cheap now -- when I sell the house. Plenty fast enough for someone eligible for a free bus pass...........
 
OK, that one will us DOT 4 for sure...!!
I only like Bevel twins, and specially the Hailwood versions, that's why I build my own MHR, based on a Mille engine, back in 1988.

(The only non Bevel I like is the '85 F1.....!!Saw ( and heard..!!) it raced by Luccinelli in Assen in the Eighties, made a huge impression on me).

But the must impressed I was by the NCR Bevel Twin endurance Ducati's raced by Victor Palomo &co. at the 8 hours of Assen, early 80's, the sound and looks were unbelievable....!!
Than I decided I had to have one of those, one time....!!
 
Back
Top