- Joined
- Apr 8, 2004
- Messages
- 25,219
- Points
- 3,671
ROFL dave.... Maybe they where using the withdrawl method and he slipped back in
dave said:“They were all surprised when they found both women were pregnant. Neither was planned.”
you would think by now he would have worked it out, front hole makes babies back hole dont :nutter:
cazz said:What is the defination of working class? Am I working class because i work?
cazz said:I feel sorry for these kids they are being given bad role models however that is no reason for them to die!
thats exactly what should happen, and thats what i will do with my partner when the time comes. the woman should not work until the child is old enough to go to school. that is the traditional approach and it works well. but you dont need benefits for it to work, you only need a father who works and is willing to support you. why should i supplement the fathers income with benefits? if he cant afford it you shouldnt have kids, if we live in a country where you can only afford kids with the aid of benefits then things have gotten worse than i ever imagined.cazz said:And just to mention your last point, i have a friend who has contributed to the country paying her taxes for years, she was told she would find it hard to get pregnant so when she did she was over the moon, she took her maternity leave but when it was up her and her partner discovered that they were not going to be able to pay for childcare for a child that young for so many hours. She has no choice but to stay at home while her boyfriend is at work and she has every right to do so. when i have children i have every intention of looking after them at home. I have paid my taxes and will make my choice to raise my children myself. When they are at school I will go back to work but it will be my chioce. Things are not always as black and white as you think.
dave said:“They were all surprised when they found both women were pregnant. Neither was planned.”
you would think by now he would have worked it out, front hole makes babies back hole dont :nutter:
Stuart DemonD said:according to some views on here, no one BUT us should pay for our family [hell as PM, why not just abolish the TAX system???] and she should just be left to die with the kids? :nutter:
jug said:if she is left to die it is only because you left her to die, not me and my tax. its your kid, you pay for it.
i think we do need tax, the money is needed to support our infrastructure. paying for roads, police, hospitals, schools, thats all fine, paying for people's kids is not what my taxes should be for.
I am paying for it - but that doesn't mean to say she can't have an income top up through the tax credit system.....jug said:if she is left to die it is only because you left her to die, not me and my tax. its your kid, you pay for it.
Goldie Punto said:Problem is some people are so far up there own arse they think there better than others.
angel said:But i'm employed and still get help, I pay tax so why shouldnt I get help?
I've always paid tax (apart from 18 months on income support) so why shouldnt I get help whilst I need it?
There are people defrauding the government saying that they are sick/disabled when they arent, so how does that work?
angel said:I am I'm scum apparently
angel said:Jug, i sincerely hope that you and your gf never split if she has a child, god forbid she had to go onto benefits in some way or form.
How would you feel then?
Oh and you are still entitled to child tax credit, up to a certain income figure, so are you goin to turn this down when you have a child? After all you've paid your taxes to receive that.