OK, Ill bare that in mind, thanks
I ain't no aerodynamics expert....
Co-efficients are one thing, but the drag of the object crucially depends on the frontal area as well. In this case, I imagine the Cinq to be smaller than the Panda, decreasing the actual drag figure even further relative to the Panda.
In the case of the Panda, the brick analogy could rarely be put to better use.
Hmm, I'm no drag cd expert either, but I'm sure I read that a bullet will actually travel faster backwards (blunt end forward) than pointy end first? Not sure how much frontal area affects overall drag CD but maybe not as much as it appears? Overall the Cinq has a much more smoothed in design compared with the Panda and I suspect that has more to do with its better aerodynamic rating. Then again, the mk1 Uno has a drag CD of something like 0.34 despite being equally chunky looking as a Panda from the front. Like the Cinq though its overall design is much more faired in/ smoother and it is subtley more curvaceous.
Still, a big power classic Panda is not about top speed, it's about embarrassing other much more expensive cars at the traffic lights :devil:
Even mk2 Puntos had hall-effect sensors for ABS that I might have been able to use, but the 1.4 engine only came out with the Mk3s. IMO there is no point using components like a different body ECU (where the problem actually lies) that requires me to use a different engine ECU that has been designed for a different engine. It will never run right, efficiently or powerfully, which is the 3 things I want from this setup. I would prefer to just have no speedo as apart from that, the car runs beautifully. Other problem is the cost of getting and testing this equipment. It is not cheap and this project is supposed to be ona budget. If I am prepared to spend £300 on ECUs and mucking about, then I should go the whole hog and get a 3rd party system really. I know it's not the same, but there we go.
It is a real shame that the ABS sensors suddenly changed design the month before the engine was introduced as I could be running ABS and stability control quite easily as well as all the speedo calcs working.
I have the car how I want it now, so development is going to slow down as I concentrate on other projects I have.
Flange is my favourite word.No, I was more thinking of you fitting compatible hub & flange assemblies fitted with the original Punto ABS sensors & loom onto the Panda if you couldnt get a compatable ECU.
If hubs arent available, could the original Panda hubs be drilled or bracketed to accept ABS sensors combined with Punto II or III ABS ring equipped flanges.
(I feel like I`m saying "flanges" too much *cough*)![]()
Flange is my favourite word.
The sensors pickup up from the wheel bearings! They are cleverly magnetised with many small polarising fields. However, I think you are right that a likely solution does lie in this area. Requires a lot of research. Would be amazing if I could have some Panda bearings made with this special treatment. Alll seems a bit unlikely though.
I do wonder if I could use a normal hall effect signal/ sensor(s) and convert this into a suitable voltage or whatever is required to fool the ECU into thinking it has these other type sensors.
Panda only shares bearings with the Y10. Pandas or Y10s were never fitted with ABS, even up until 2003. Bear in mind most small FIATS sold now don't have ABS as standard. Pandas did get steering wheel airbags though as you say. There was an Uno "Antiskid" model from memory which had ABS, but it's all academic since my ABS system is completely different from the "hall effect" of old systems. Hall effect in this case simply means a ferous metal passing near a sensor many times, so an ECU can work out the speed of a rotating shaft. My sensors don't work like that, so have to use New Punto or newer car stuff.
I used Y10 Mk2 shafts complete. Go straight in, with the CV joint being same part as Panda. You can modify Cinquecento shafts using a Panda CV joint to fit with a lathe.
Bear in mind most small FIATS sold now don't have ABS as standard. Pandas did get steering wheel airbags though as you say.
Fair cop. This must be a very new thing as Punto Mk2bs didn't have ABS on 1.2 FIRE models and they were only recently(ish) axed.Never knew they had airbags, but ALL new Fiats now come with ABS as standard
Jon.
Fair cop. This must be a very new thing as Punto Mk2bs didn't have ABS on 1.2 FIRE models and they were only recently(ish) axed.
The discussion was about ABS as standard. I know that the 1.2 models did not come with ABS as I took some parts off a 2004 model without ABS. Either they changed the policy later into the run as MEP suggested or yours was an optional extra?one on my drive has abs
I think my bathroom scales are rubbish, so I better get it weighed properly before I stick it on. 4Kg seems too light having looked at others, including yours. I didn't specify to the machinist what I wanted from where. All they do is build engines, so I thought it best to say what I wanted it for and let them just do it. At £30 + VAT, it seems fair value. I suppose more from more tricky places would have cost more money as well.THAT picture is the lightened one?! Look slike notings been taken off
4Kg is quite light but should be fine![]()
What you on about? You think I need head work? I have thought about some fast road cams and a little porting, but perhaps in a years time or something. Don't wanna go crazy on this one. I have an Uno track day car in planning stage.Pull the head off and sort that while your there![]()
The discussion was about ABS as standard. I know that the 1.2 models did not come with ABS as I took some parts off a 2004 model without ABS. Either they changed the policy later into the run as MEP suggested or yours was an optional extra?
Cheers for the input. I do not know the answer. Sport models had it, normal ones did not?every active sport 8v we looked at had it when we bought it![]()
The discussion was about ABS as standard. I know that the 1.2 models did not come with ABS as I took some parts off a 2004 model without ABS. Either they changed the policy later into the run as MEP suggested or yours was an optional extra?