Oh that made me laugh Stephen!"But it's a bargain dear not even the price of a replacement gearbox for a Seat!"
Oh that made me laugh Stephen!"But it's a bargain dear not even the price of a replacement gearbox for a Seat!"
They have had more than 1. A 1973 DAF 66 Sold for £3200.Great. What did it fetch?
I prefer the older models "Daffodil", 33, 44, and 55. The 46 and 66 - and later Volvo badged cars - made their engines behave more like typical modern CVT transmissions ie, too "revy". Once you got into the way of throttle control the earlier ones could be driven really very quietly. It's the two cylinder cars, so 33 and 44 (and a Daffodil if I could find one) that I find most interesting.They have had more than 1. A 1973 DAF 66 Sold for £3200.
Though I have worked on many of the older 33s and 44s etc. In the 1970s we fitted lots of the drive belts and new centrifugal clutch shoes.I prefer the older models "Daffodil", 33, 44, and 55. The 46 and 66 - and later Volvo badged cars - made their engines behave more like typical modern CVT transmissions ie, too "revy". Once you got into the way of throttle control the earlier ones could be driven really very quietly. It's the two cylinder cars, so 33 and 44 (and a Daffodil if I could find one) that I find most interesting.
Us too. Drive belts, particularly on the more powerfull 55, didn't last anything like as long as they should. Don't know if you knew? but genuine Daf belt kits were matched for size. That is to say a genuine kit had two belts of the exact same length. This was quite an important thing because below about 5mph or so the pulleys would be in their lowest ratio position. So the axle pulley halves would be fully together and the primary unit pulley halves pretty much fully apart. In this position, if the belts were not exactly the same length the car would pull to one side or the other until the speed increased enough to allow the pulleys to start altering. I used to collect "good" used belts which I then "recycled" on my 33 van. they never matched so my poor wee 33 always pulled one way or the other when coming to a dead stop or just when starting to move. It was a good thing the rear brakes were exempt from roller brake testing as I don't know what an MOT tester might have made of it?Though I have worked on many of the older 33s and 44s etc. In the 1970s we fitted lots of the drive belts and new centrifugal clutch shoes.
Later I had a customer with a really clean 2litre 340 GLT with conventional auto box.
The local Daf Dealer was in Torquay Denis Kelly's as I recall.Us too. Drive belts, particularly on the more powerfull 55, didn't last anything like as long as they should. Don't know if you knew? but genuine Daf belt kits were matched for size. That is to say a genuine kit had two belts of the exact same length. This was quite an important thing because below about 5mph or so the pulleys would be in their lowest ratio position. So the axle pulley halves would be fully together and the primary unit pulley halves pretty much fully apart. In this position, if the belts were not exactly the same length the car would pull to one side or the other until the speed increased enough to allow the pulleys to start altering. I used to collect "good" used belts which I then "recycled" on my 33 van. they never matched so my poor wee 33 always pulled one way or the other when coming to a dead stop or just when starting to move. It was a good thing the rear brakes were exempt from roller brake testing as I don't know what an MOT tester might have made of it?
The earlier shoe type centrifugal clutches were a constant source of "driver awareness instruction" for me. From the workshop point of view the 2 cylinder engines were a peach to do as I'm sure you'll remember. There was no radiator (air cooled) so just a front panel to remove and a few bits and bobs then we had a wheeled platform which just slid in under the engine and you pulled it forward off the propshaft (Just a "plug in" spline) and wheeled the engine out. The primary unit (effectively the gearbox) was in the back so wasn't involved. Later vehicles, the 46 and 66 had plate type centrifugal clutches (well the 66 did, not quite so sure about the 46?) which could be worn out just as quickly and cost a lot more. The secret was to keep the foot off the throttle when stationary and accelerate quite briskly when moving off so the plate didn't slip for too long. A technique which owners of modern direct shift gearboxes with "dry" clutch packs would be well advised to take heed off. The cost of replacing one of those "dual clutch" babies would let you buy several nearly new Daf 33s?
When Volvo took over, the big Volvo dealer down the road from us took all our customers away by offering crazy discounts. I suppose they could afford to do this as the wee cars were only a small part of their sales whereas we couldn't compete. A few very loyal customers stayed with us which was very touching but we just couldn't sell enough cars so the boss looked for another agency. The local Alfa garage had just shut it's doors and there were lots of rumours flying around that we were going to take it. As you might imagine, I got quite excited at the prospect. Unfortunately, in the event we became Polski Fiat dealers. I'd better not comment! Anyway, I was already in the pipeline for the instructor job so I moved soon after.
I'm not a big fan of HD as they try to sell a 'Lifestyle' and a number of fools buy into it. I worked with one. That said, I do like the XR 1200 and the V-Rod.The Harley I really liked was the XR 750 racing version.
I did see a similar one in the late 1970s I think, when they did a long track speedway Demo near me and when compared with the current Hagon Jap 500cc ones we used here for short track on shale it showed it's pedigree![]()
It was the fact it was a stripped down all out racer I liked , not the big bulky things we see everywhere nowadays.I'm not a big fan of HD as they try to sell a 'Lifestyle' and a number of fools buy into it. I worked with one. That said, I do like the XR 1200 and the V-Rod.
The key to long belt life was frequent adjustment. This is why they had a 3000 mile/3 month service schedule. Only job really was to adjust the belts, and a general check over. If adjusted every 3000 miles, the belts would last 70k miles, but if one adjustment was missed, you could take 2/3 off that life. For regular customers, we'd do the adjustment for free, as once over the pit it would only take 10 minutes. Pit was best for this, tweak the adjustment, roll the car back and forth to seat teh belts, recheck. Difficult to do on a 4-post hoist.... Drive belts, particularly on the more powerfull 55, didn't last anything like as long as they should.
How do you like my new machine...I proved a point yesterday, but in a good way. The guy in charge of events in our local MC chapter asked for help hauling the gear so he could actually ride his bike to the shindigs once in a while. I volunteered the Russian Mini-Tractor. He wasn't sure I could do it so we did a dry run last night to a Harley Davidson dealership Bike Night. Chris figured that it would take at least 30 minutes for me to load up. I did it in ten. That's Chris's restored 1976 Sportster next to the Ural.
![]()
The load set up at the Harley shop.
![]()
Very cool.How do you like my new machine...View attachment 447883View attachment 447884
Thought you would like it!. Its a 2021 model. Owned by a friendly german couple. i asked to take a pic. He said sit on, and Ill take your pic. They had done over 1500 miles in around a week. It did really look cool.Very cool.
That explains the sidecar on the right.Thought you would like it!. Its a 2021 model. Owned by a friendly german couple. i asked to take a pic. He said sit on, and Ill take your pic. They had done over 1500 miles in around a week. It did really look cool.
Yes , I was looking at that.That explains the sidecar on the right.