You are correct I don't know the exact conditions.
However what I do know is that it was a residential street, so the maximum speed is 30mph (although it could be 20mph). And you cannot get a car up a kerb, across grass, a wall through a hedge and two cars and that far into a house (on a corner) from a 30mph start.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...80mph-ploughs-house-Oliffe-Way-Aylesbury.html
The passenger sent a text seconds before the crash, they were doing 100mph.
As much as I love my kids, I would struggle to show them any compassion if they were to do this sort of thing.
I think the main problem majority of us have here is the fact that at some point we are all plagued by these tools driving dangerously & the more you drive, the higher the likeliehood you will come across these idiots.
Going back to Scout's original post - if the car had been fitted with a dsahcam, there would be no need for expensive crash investigations, the footage would have shown the driver a> driving like a tool way before the accident or b> driving normally & a sudden, unexpected 'surge' a second or two before the accident..
EDIT, altered link.
interestingly, the paper reported this as being the result of a crash at 80 and yet the passenger's text moments before impact said 100. What's even more interesting is that his mates were at the scene before emergency services!
Last edited: