Which completely defeats the purpose of having them in the first place![]()
Let me ask you a question.
Who put the signs there in the first place????
blu:devil:
Which completely defeats the purpose of having them in the first place![]()
Let me ask you a question.
Who put the signs there in the first place????
blu:devil:
Can you spot the revenue raiser?
more to the point:
can you spot the peson who knows what the limit is, and still exceeds it?
can you spot the whiner who despite knowing the cams are out there, and the limit on the road, still exceeds the limits, and bitches about it?
more to the point:
can you spot the peson who knows what the limit is, and still exceeds it?
can you spot the whiner who despite knowing the cams are out there, and the limit on the road, still exceeds the limits, and bitches about it?
:chin:
what? at least have the balls, if not courtesy to say it....what it boils down to, time and again, is a lack of willing to take responsiblity for your own actions, if you didnt exceed the limit, you wouldnt be photo'd. where's the problem? the siting of the camera is irrelevant, the limit still applies on theother side of a bridge, round a corner, etc etc.
but no one has told you to stop speeding, you want to go faster, do it, by all means. but if you're caught, you can't whine about it, because you already know what the penalties are.
"whinging poms"? seems more like the usual moaning aussies.....
Drive through camera 1 @ 30mph.
Pull over.
Wait.
Drive through camera 2 @ 130mph.
Laugh.
P.S. Don't do the above. It's naughty.
But for argument's sake, 10,000+ people got caught speeding since a new tunnel opened in the space of two months under the exact same circumstances - 10,000+ people can't all be wrong!
Yes, they can. People don't like speed cameras because they're so good at what they do, catching speeders. They don't suggest whether the speed was dangerous; it's not necessary; it's the act of breaking the speed limit that's illegal.
The government did a massive backflip the day after they said motorists should pay or fight in court - now people who went between 40 - 80km/hr will have their fines/points returned.
If I get fined I might fight for the same (different tunnel but same circumstances)..
The catch was that if you were eligible to have a refund, YOU had to send it back, not them sending out the refund to everyone entitled to one.
Of course! They will never, as long as they don't have a conscience, go through every single fine and work out which ones are legit and which ones aren't.
Have you actually recieved a fine yet, or is this all 'hypothetical'?
blu:devil:
Not yet, but being a worry-wort (Turbodiesel, fiatdownunder, T et al can testify that) I can feel one coming - other tunnel users have already been stung by it.
people zoom down it, see the camera at the last minute and slam they're brakes on. Caused lots of shunts.
They are aimed at reducing accidents but they cause so many.