0-60mph in how many seconds?

Currently reading:
0-60mph in how many seconds?

Re: not on the public road of course....

sorry people, did'nt get chance to try my hlx at 0-60 last night. i'll try again tonight though but my power does seem to drain at about 55mph in 2nd. oh well we can but try.
 
Finished the test!

Chris,

I reach 60 in 2nd gear, and can get to 64mph before I really need to change to 3rd.

Hope this answers your question

Huw
 
Re: Finished the test!

Huw,

Cheers mate i'll have a blast as soon as possible. did you say your's was a 1.6 or 1.8?

By the way, what was your time??
 
Testing

Mine's a 1.6 Chris.

I couldn't really effectively time it myself last night, but have done before & although my time varies on how much gas I have in the tank - my best is 8.7 seconds.

Cheers

Huw
 
Re: Testing

What mods have you got. 8.7 sounds a damn good time for a 1.6 so i might think about going down the same route as you. mines completely standard at the minute but only until i gather some cash to put under it.
 
Re: Testing

Just spent 5 mins reading all these posts. Never tried to completely screw (i.e. Nige's mode of 'semi-automatic' changes :)) but a 1.6 can definitely do a little under 10 secs and the 1.8 is around 9 seconds. This is from a 3500-4000rpm start, dumping the clutch and changing gear for the revs to stay around max power - 5800rpmish. Both need the xtra change into 3rd tho.

A small question for any budding physicists: on a 60litre fuel tank, how many more MPG would you do from running the tank from half-full to empty rather than full to half-full: I'm getting fed-up with people saying that you should never fill the fuel tank above half, cos for all the extra fuss I don't think you'd get much better fuel economy.
 
Re: Re: Testing

Hi

Correct me if I'm wrong guys, but I'm not sure there's really any noticeable difference between a 1.6 & 1.8 in regards to the 0-60 time. I drove a 1.8 a while ago and it didn't seem more responsive until post 60 mark. I guess this means that the top end is obviously better, but something to do with with gear ratios up to the 60 mark?

Huw
 
Re: Re: Re: Testing

After several trys i can honestly say that my 1.8 will only go to 58mph in second gear. a little more power needed i think.
 
Re: HGT + Advice

Just tried mine again and without any fancy Nige clutch
stuff I can get a 0-60 of about 7.6 - thats the average
over 5 runs - discounting the time I drop the clutch
to much , spun for ages and got a time of 11 secs !

Fuel - well on the third run the light came on - so very low.
Tyres - Michelin Pilots
Conditions - 15c , engine was warm and tyres were warm.
Out of interest I have noticed if I stop (i.e. turn off) the car once its been running a while and start her up again it goes quicker - not sure why though !
As for mod's - only a suspension upgrade (abarth springs).

The timings were done by someone else.
In gears I can get to 64 mph in second , 37mph in first.
Mileage - 29959

Petrol - Esso unleaded (not super , sure that will knock off 0.2 secs).

Hope thats of use / help / interst to someone.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Testing

Chris

The only mods I've had done to my 1.6 are:

Induction Kit
Power boost valve
Rolling Road Tuned
HGT alloys and P6000 tyres
Lowered 40 mm

+ i always use shell super unleaded
and once a month i put in Redex Power boost fuel additive.

Cheers

Huw
 
Re: Re: HGT + Advice

I think a pipercross induction kit and a new back box should see me doing 60 in second then i will try again as my best time at standard is just under 10.5 seconds.

Whatch this space.

If anyone gives a s**t


Chris
 
2nd gear

I got upto 62mph in my 1.8 before the rev limiter cut in. There was only me in the car so i couldnt time myself. I used to own a 1.6 which is no slower to 60 really, but wasnt as good aabove this speed and going up hills.
 
0-60

in my 1.8 ive done just under 9 secs , with me and 1 passenger before, hitting just under 60 in second, by the time its bounced of the limiter its past 60 - so u dont need to changer gear. the only mods on mine are taking of the air feed pipe from behind the grille.
course mfrs are gonna slow down the times - cheaper insurance groups means more people can afford the insurance so more will buy them!
 
Re: Re: 0-60

I was wondering that too. i'm probably wrong but surely its benificial to have a cold air feed straight to the filter.
 
Re: Re: Re: 0-60

Definately is better to have it there... unless a performance filter has been fitted in which case another custom cold feed pipe should be fitted... and all the original plastic feed pipes and resonators can be removed... if it aint there you will be getting warm air intake... not good.
 
Cold feed pipe

I didnt explain it very well - the pipes still their but its only connected at the filter end - not the cold feed end - the cold feed gives a much smaller hole for the air to get thru - so it restricts the flow of air - cold air still gets the filter tho. It is definitely faster - cant feel a difference but up against a mates car its dead even with the pipe on - and slightly faster with the pipe off - ive tried it loads of times. Sounds much better too!
 
Re: Cold feed pipe

i have to say sorry to everyone as i've just proven myself wrong and hit 60 in second. Still only got a time of 9.8, but thats probably my driving. at least i have something to work with now.

Andy H

Why not replace the cold air feed with a larger pipe running straight to the filter. Im sure you would get more power this way as any air coming through the engine bay will be heated by the engine.

Let me know if i'm wrong cause this is what i'm planning.


Chris
 
air feed

dont believe what i say - im making it up as i go along - ive just read a few articles and it sounds reasonable. Its the square opening at the front of the engine ba in the big black plastic thing that restricts the flow - not the pipe itself. The pipe still directs the cold air to the filter but it takes extra air from the engine which is probably hotter - but still gets improved air flow. Even if it doesnt make a difference to performance do it anuyway cos it sounds like a pipercross or something!!!
 
Re: air feed

Hey guys, I've been away for two days and I find great havoc with a thread that I started ages ago.

Lets get this thing clear. Everyone open your Bravo manual and you will see that the 1.6 Bravo has the longest 2nd gear which can reach to well over 60 mph therefore discounting the need of changing over to third gear thus reducing 0-60 time.

You guys better believe Huw T when he says that he gets 9 secs with his 1.6 because its real. I can even outrun a 1.8 in a straightline, but then by the time I switch to fourth the 1.8 unleashes that extra 10bhp and starts haunting me in my rearview mirrors.

Oh yeah...my car is pretty standard except for an induction kit (connected directly to engine), straight pipe exhaust and lowered by 45mm which gives better traction off the mark.

And another thing....I live in Malta and people say that our fuel has one of the highest octane rating in Europe....could that be a reason for the good times? Maybe, maybe not.

And yet another thing. Practice makes perfect. I hook up with countless other 'Fast&Furious' wannabees every Sunday on an abandoned runway and whip the help out of our cars. The term whip maybe an understatement because I had even gone to the extent of installing nitro in ma system (recently removed it after witnessing two engine blow-ups on an Ibiza GTI and a Honda CRX Del Sol). But I tell you, ma little Fiat was a total joy when switching on that magic button!
But to keep to the point, after doing the run for several times you start getting the optimum feel to drop the pedal to the metal witout spinning excessively.
 

Similar threads

P
Replies
15
Views
12K
Dark Lurker
D
J
Replies
1
Views
1K
Frank
F
M
Replies
5
Views
565
K
Back
Top