Yo
Part 2;
You told all about technical thinks like hot or cold temperature etc..
To be honest, I am not interested in any of this. Because I prefer to refer to legal documents. In this context, i asked to Fiat Turkey;
if they had a legal document that would override the user guide.
In the answer given, they said that there was no such document and that they made the decisions according to Zkart. (I have no idea what Zkart is and what kind of authority do they that make invalid the user guide written by the manufacturer.)
Part 3;
You said "no way of knowing if its always had one oil or another put in it"
I have all the service records 20K, 40K, 60K, 80K. The vehicle was sold to the first owner(A Woman) in 02/2014. So, the vehicle has warranty until 02/2017. The first two maintenances (20K,40K) have been made by the authorized service due to the warranty rules. The other two maintenances were optionally carried out at the authorized service.
The history of the my vehicle is clear enough but it's not important i think. Because I question the faulty maintenance performed in the authorized service, not the maintenance performed elsewhere.
Final Part;
It can be a dream that my car will be replaced with a new one. I accept this. But at least they can maintain 100K for free and provide an extra warranty for possible future engine malfunctions.
Ok so assuming your car Euro6, they put a 5w-40 weight oil in the car, which won’t cause any damage it is slightly (only very slightly) higher viscosity but as you’re not interested in common sense and you’ve got yourself all worked up about the manual we’ll forget trying reason or explain.
Ultimately the goal was to try and explain the situation to you to save you racking up a huge legal bill as you were talking about judges and lawyers and engineer reports.
As I see it you do not have any “legal” document you have a hand book with a recommendation of the oil that should be used and a warning not to deviate from this, for the purposes of maintaining the warranty which has long since expired.
So you have a car with a service record and you’ve only owned it a few months. You can refer to the service record and make an assumption that the correct oil has been used, (but you can’t say for sure unless you you have a document showing what oil was used) you don’t have any way of knowing if the previous other had topped the oil up at any point without using the correct oil. You can’t say that another garage hasn’t done some work on it, maybe even major engine work, after the warranty had expired, and the didn’t want this to impair the sale to a new owner so this information is not in your service book.
You only know the actual service history of the car between the day you picked it up and now, you can’t even be sure that service history is 100% correct unless someone has sat down and backed it up by referring to the service records that the garage holds, these days there are plenty of fake service records about.
So are fiat going to give you a brand new car to replace an 8 year old car that someone has used 5w40, instead of 0w30, well there is no real difference from a users perspective, so no it’s ridiculous to think they would replace the car.
There is also no likely engine damage that would result from this, any engine damage is more likely to be caused by a previous owner, bad driving, having done 100k, would fiat replace an engine for this substitution of oil, absolutely not.
Would they give you a new dealer warranty for 100k more miles or KM, well again no, the car has done 100k already, things will inevitably go wrong, so where would fiat draw the line between something failing because a slightly different oil being used and the actual failure. Would a oil seal leaking for example would be expected given the age of the car and the, at this point rubber components would start to break down and leak or fail.
If I were fiat (I’m assuming given all the fuss its a fiat dealer who have done this) if its a fiat dealer then the dealership would be responsible not Fiat themselves, in this instance, i would offer to change the oil and filter, maybe “flush the oil” and then as a good will gesture maybe offer a future service or a £50 voucher or something.
It will not have damaged the engine (regardless of the fact that you don’t care about the technicalities)
If there is any existing damage, as a dealership I would force you to prove it and i would force you to prove that damage didn’t already exist and that the wrong oil caused it, I would then simply argue its an old second hand car and you can’t prove someone hasn’t poured sand in the oil at any point in the past for all you know.
I would not give you a new car, the suggestion anyone would is hilarious.
I would not change the engine, if the engine is fine and its highly unlikely any problem with the engine would be caused then to change the engine, have some heavy handed mechanic who is now annoyed with you pull your old engine out and then put a replacement in, could actually leave you with more problems, clips and pipes broken, not put back properly, etc. Any work you do on a car will never leave it as it was when it was a new car, a replacement engine may also have a future effect on the resale price.
Yes some appropriate compensation might be offered, certainly not a 100k warranty on an already 100k 8 year old car..... at best you might get a parts only warranty.... parts are very cheap £20 for an oil shield but the labour work would likely cost hundreds and hundreds and you’d be tied to only getting hat work done at that fiat dealer, when an independent might be far cheaper.
I’m going to bow out here, because you’ve got a legal bee in your bonnet and you’re not capable of seeing sense, feel free to keep us up to date on your legal battle and how it turns out.