- Joined
- Mar 1, 2014
- Messages
- 4,432
- Points
- 828
You're lucky to have made it that far chap.
You're lucky to have made it that far chap.
05:30 in the works car park, finishing night shift and just want to go home, but all the doors on my panda are frozen solid and I can't get in! Manage to open the tailgate, remove the parcel shelf, climb through and force the drivers door open from inside. Seems that condensation on the door frame has frozen and welded the doors closed, will make sure to wipe it all down with a dry cloth when I get to work tonight!
Spray/coat the rubber seals with some silicone grease the night before, this is kind to the rubber and should help to prevent that from happening!
Thanks for the advice, I think I've got some silicon spray somewhere but I'm not entirely convinced that it was the rubber as there were large dollops of ice on the actual metal surfaces both of the car and the inside of the door. But it won't hurt to give it a spray, anyway it's raining now so hopefully there won't be the same problem tonight.
Silicone spray does work, I do all my cars at the start of winter, doors open easily even when it's -15.
I've had the ice problem too, it's normally when snow has melted and refrozen during the day. Only prevention is to make sure to sweep the car clear of snow in the morning.
Newer "gutterless" cars are worse for this, another step backwards in practicality in the name of "style".
While gutterless is worse for freezing, the removal of gutters is driven more by nose reduction and fuel economy than style.
Maybe it's a design of the windscreen which means they get dazzled more easily?VW Polos, or more appropriately their owners.
Leaving Oxford in the evening peak, the journey home was slow. Three occasions the traffic was moving significantly slower than normal (which is already slower than necessary), each time the queue was headed by a Polo, apparently afraid of the dark.
I understood that the gutterless design was to create a more consistent build.
Older cars with gutters were made of lots of pieces welded together, and with small errors at each joint, door fit and other panels fit was random. The side of the car had sills, front, centre and rear pillars, and roof, all as separate panels.
One of the Japanese manufacturers, Toyota or Nissan I think, pressed the side panel as one piece. If the first was correct, then every car will be correct. So the doors fit properly, every time. Multi-panel cars had the doors adjusted on the production line, often poorly, and I remember the pre-delivery inspection on mid-70s Rover Group cars being more than a day, much of which was to adjust doors, bonnet and boot. The Japanese side panels have marks at the hinges, and the door fits on the production line, with marks on the hinges aligning with the side panel, for a perfect fit every time.
Reason for it was consistency in production, other benefits were cleaner lines, less wind noise, but did sometimes create a leak point at the seams.
Downsides, rain dropping onto passengers as they get in/out, and more difficult to attach a roof rack.
You could still leave the gutters in place, or fit plastic strips with the newer panel alignment techniques so I don't think that is the reason for their removal.
Wanted to save progress on gt sport today but facing this...
Quick search online tells that the servers are down!!! Pisstake.
View attachment 186915View attachment 186916View attachment 186917