What's made you grumpy today?

Currently reading:
What's made you grumpy today?

I should have posted this yesterday, but nevermind.

I switched my TV on to watch a program I'd recorded whilst having my dinner on, and the news was on at that time. They were saying about how gas/oil central heating systems should be ripped out and replaced in order to help tackle climate change. Obviously, scrapping perfectly serviceable boilers and radiators doesn't generate greenhouse gases at all...

All these harebrained ideas seriously cheese me off. I completely agree that we need to start tackling climate change, but until some clever person invents a reliable electric system that offers comparable performance, unfortunately, a gas combi-boiler is the most efficient means of heating.

council are ripping out peoples oil heating and putting in air pump heating, they are costing people a fortune to run as uk houses are not built insulated enough to make them efficient. the elderly are scared to rum them due to the cost, if we get a bad winter people are going to die.
 
As usual, headlines go for the 'big wins' and ignore the detail. If we all go electric heating, and electric cars, where is all this electricity coming from? We need to go back to address needs and wants. New houses need to be well insulated, then either better insulate older houses, or knock down and build new better ones, whichever is more efficient.

But currently around here, so many new houses are being built, but there is no more employment, so we are creating more commuters. Before the car, we all lived close to work, we need a culture change to move us back towards that, where possible. But also remove the desire to keep travelling. So much is done because we can, which we then interpret as a need. I meet so many people who travel a hundred miles for a 15 minute business meeting, then return.

Rail travel instead of cars would help, if only it could cope. Biggest problem is too many people, a long-term plan to reduce population is needed, not involving mass genocide. There's a task no politician will volunteer for.

Some years ago, we had a small house, mid terrace, electric storage heaters, warm 24/7, cheap. Washing machine and dishwasher ran on overnight cheap power too. Always a challenge to set the input for the next day's weather/temp, so as Jock says, sometimes too hot/cold. Always thought a mix of sotorage heaters as background and radiators as top-up might work.

Government heads flying around the world to climate summits is a bit of an irony.
 
Had a prat bump into the back of the Fabia earlier today. Now a nice cracked bumper to sort.
My learner had approached a mini-roundabout quite gently as visibility is poor, as we arrived, there was a car from the right, so we stopped. Idiot behind followed gently, paused, then moved forward more and hit us. He seemed to think we might be at fault. I pointed out he'd effectively just hit a parked car! He failed to explain how that might be our fault. Two L-plates on the back of the car didn't seem to keep him away.
 
As usual, headlines go for the 'big wins' and ignore the detail. If we all go electric heating, and electric cars, where is all this electricity coming from? We need to go back to address needs and wants. New houses need to be well insulated, then either better insulate older houses, or knock down and build new better ones, whichever is more efficient.

But currently around here, so many new houses are being built, but there is no more employment, so we are creating more commuters. Before the car, we all lived close to work, we need a culture change to move us back towards that, where possible. But also remove the desire to keep travelling. So much is done because we can, which we then interpret as a need. I meet so many people who travel a hundred miles for a 15 minute business meeting, then return.

Rail travel instead of cars would help, if only it could cope. Biggest problem is too many people, a long-term plan to reduce population is needed, not involving mass genocide. There's a task no politician will volunteer for.

Some years ago, we had a small house, mid terrace, electric storage heaters, warm 24/7, cheap. Washing machine and dishwasher ran on overnight cheap power too. Always a challenge to set the input for the next day's weather/temp, so as Jock says, sometimes too hot/cold. Always thought a mix of sotorage heaters as background and radiators as top-up might work.

Government heads flying around the world to climate summits is a bit of an irony.

Personally I'd love to see people being encouraged to cycle more. It might just be NI, but our 'city' is tiny, 4 miles wide / tall essentially... you can reasonably with average fitness get from A to B by bike easily with good cycle paths too.


Also, for companies to make use of their internal Skype / meeting rooms more than travelling up and down the country and between NI / Mainland etc. Happens a LOT in my current company and I think it's one of the big 'I NEED a car' excuses we hear a lot.


Won't hold my breath though
 
Personally I'd love to see people being encouraged to cycle more.

No idea what the topography is like there, but this suggestion usually comes from people in flatter areas. Head to hilly areas and cycling becomes much more difficult, so for the few only. Here the town is in a small bowl, so cycling for this unfit person is a real challenge, but walking anywhere is easier. Once you leave town, everywhere else is a long way. Nearest large town, Swindon is 13 miles away, mostly on a main A-road with insufficient space for cycles to share, so they are at high risk. Nearer Swindon there are a few cyclists who ride to work, but the trouble they cause for other traffic is severe. People get impatient and push past with insufficient space, and the resultant acceleration probably uses more extra fuel than the cyclists would use if they used their own cars instead.

The answer would be more cycle lanes, properly built with space, but that is expensive. Now, an electric bike might work.
 
Think I have a similar topographical situation, my commute to work would be great, dropping from 700ft down to work at 200ft in 6 and a bit miles. Way back is a killer though after a shift.

I did do it a few times a few years ago but the combination of sheer lack of any consideration of other road users and the type of unlit 60mph country roads made it an adventure to say the least. Combined with the feeling of hitting the end of shift and thinking "FFS now I've got an hour of battling uphill on a bike to get home while people attempt to kill me" made it a none starter.

This was pre-electric bikes though so without being stuck at walking pace on the steep bits with line of traffic behind waiting to have a go at putting you into the hedge it would be better. That and there is the longer route which is 11 miles but as it uses an old railway track bed and cycle paths avoids all the scary bits. Was a bit kong to use under muscle power alone but more reasonable work assistance.
 
No idea what the topography is like there, but this suggestion usually comes from people in flatter areas. Head to hilly areas and cycling becomes much more difficult, so for the few only. Here the town is in a small bowl, so cycling for this unfit person is a real challenge, but walking anywhere is easier. Once you leave town, everywhere else is a long way. Nearest large town, Swindon is 13 miles away, mostly on a main A-road with insufficient space for cycles to share, so they are at high risk. Nearer Swindon there are a few cyclists who ride to work, but the trouble they cause for other traffic is severe. People get impatient and push past with insufficient space, and the resultant acceleration probably uses more extra fuel than the cyclists would use if they used their own cars instead.

The answer would be more cycle lanes, properly built with space, but that is expensive. Now, an electric bike might work.

I had a temporary job in Abingdon and took digs about 5 miles away in Kingston-Bagpuize - a direct connection via B road. It's flat road so should have been an easy cycle ride but it's narrow and driven by complete idiots. Unsurprisingly you'll see very few cyclists on that road.
 
Wutan Coronavirus. Common cold, SARS and influenza are all corona viruses so why it can't have a proper name is anyone's guess.

The big worries are -

(1) China local administrators avoid sending bad news to Peking. It's estimated the disease is at least 10 times as bad as we are told by mainstream news media.
(2) Airlines like BA have cancelled all flights to China but the persistent under-reporting is not helping anyone outside China to prepare.
(3) The Chinese totalitarian state is locking everything down, but their economy has all but stopped. Pretty much everything used in the world has Chinese parts and components. This alone could have massive economic effects.
(4) What controls do we have in place for when the big numbers hit Europe? Not to mention the economic fall-out.


Is this fear mongering rubbish? Not if it becomes a fraction of the 1918 flu pandemic.
 
Wutan Coronavirus. Common cold, SARS and influenza are all corona viruses so why it can't have a proper name is anyone's guess.

It does have a proper name “novel coronavirus” or nCoV for short, along the same lines as MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV it is a previously unknown coronavirus with an unknown origin but Is thought to have originated in an animal market in Wutan having mutated and spread from an animal.

The reason they are treating it so seriously is because it is a seriously dangerous and life threatening condition even healthy younger people are dying from it, including the original doctor from China who tried to warn about it, before it became known in the media.

The problem here is that it is a virus similar in nature and spread to the common cold, if everyone you knew caught a common cold and found themself needing intensive care treatment that would very quickly overwhelm the hospitals and lead to hundreds of deaths. So far better to contain it and try and prevent its spread while studying it.

There is a large amount of information circulating around the nhs and other health services at the moment as well as planning in place of how to deal with it if it does spread, hopefully we will avoid the numbers of cases currently in China but preventing its spread.
 
Last edited:
I had a temporary job in Abingdon and took digs about 5 miles away in Kingston-Bagpuize - a direct connection via B road. It's flat road so should have been an easy cycle ride but it's narrow and driven by complete idiots. Unsurprisingly you'll see very few cyclists on that road.

It is still much the same, a little slower with increased traffic, but very intolerant of cycles.
 
Wutan Coronavirus. Common cold, SARS and influenza are all corona viruses so why it can't have a proper name is anyone's guess.

The big worries are -

(1) China local administrators avoid sending bad news to Peking. It's estimated the disease is at least 10 times as bad as we are told by mainstream news media.
(2) Airlines like BA have cancelled all flights to China but the persistent under-reporting is not helping anyone outside China to prepare.
(3) The Chinese totalitarian state is locking everything down, but their economy has all but stopped. Pretty much everything used in the world has Chinese parts and components. This alone could have massive economic effects.
(4) What controls do we have in place for when the big numbers hit Europe? Not to mention the economic fall-out.


Is this fear mongering rubbish? Not if it becomes a fraction of the 1918 flu pandemic.

Last week our government advisd all British nationals to leave China, whilst at the same time pledging assistance to China's administration to help contain the virus. I'm thinking those two things conflict. Anyone already there might be a carrier, so no, don't leave. Don't all rush back here and help it spread.
 
The news is spreading this to scare people now that their hoax about scaring people over Brexit has been disproven... and we’re all still alive, sun in the sky and oxygen to breath.

There has been bird flu, Ebola, and all sorts of disease outbreaks. Horrible. Kill people. Hard to contain. But WILL be contained.

Anything involving China is going to be on a whole different scale given its population and its government. But still, for the average person here in the UK, not worth losing sleep over.

I’m glad that mainstream media will be dead in our generation. So much unnecessary fear (all of the time)
 
Last week our government advisd all British nationals to leave China, whilst at the same time pledging assistance to China's administration to help contain the virus. I'm thinking those two things conflict. Anyone already there might be a carrier, so no, don't leave. Don't all rush back here and help it spread.
Yes PB. My immediate "knee jerk" reaction is the same. The less people move around the less risk there must be for transmission. Seems to be the thinking behind most of the official stuff being put out so this decision does seem to fly in the face of logic. Of course I'm sitting here in the comfort of my home with a large teaching hospital with a dedicated infectious diseases isolation unit just five minutes in the car down the road. Easy for me to say then?
 
The news is spreading this to scare people now that their hoax about scaring people over Brexit has been disproven... and we’re all still alive, sun in the sky and oxygen to breath.

Erm...small point we're in the transitional period which is basically business as usual.

Boris is currently threatening Europe with an "Australian style deal" I.e. WTO. If he doesn't get his own way with a "Canada Style Deal".

What's interesting about that is Australia is trying to get off WTO terms and into a free trade agreement with the EU...

So yeah...nothing has changed at all yet so celebrating it all going fine is like telling the patient the operation was a success as he arrives in the car park on the big day.
 
Erm...small point we're in the transitional period which is basically business as usual.



Boris is currently threatening Europe with an "Australian style deal" I.e. WTO. If he doesn't get his own way with a "Canada Style Deal".



What's interesting about that is Australia is trying to get off WTO terms and into a free trade agreement with the EU...



So yeah...nothing has changed at all yet so celebrating it all going fine is like telling the patient the operation was a success as he arrives in the car park on the big day.



Yeah, you’re totally right. After all, people celebrated back when we went IN!

Hindsight is always 20:20, eh?!

As we know better now, I celebrate [emoji322]
 
More water ingress into the rear of the Barchetta.

This will be a summer strip out/down and no doubt a lot of work. I already have some water defences/guidance in place but now it is time for radical action.

I just wish Fiat had actually combined the sleek, smart, hidden hood cover/well etc. with an additional attention to how water, wind and slopes can completely stuff an otherwise pretty perfect cosmetic and styling design.

But as they say convertibles are for warm and dry countries and anywhere else is a lottery.
 
Appointment at the bodyshop for the 'engineer's report and estimate' for the rear bumper damage on the Fabia. It was a light bump, caught the edge of the rear beam, so split the bumper, but no apparent damage to the beam.

So the estimator says he'll put down for a new beam, "we'll replace it anyway", and a new reversing sensor, as the bumper damage is close. The sensors are working fine. No wonder insurance costs so much, when bodyshops add cost without proper justification.

Then the icing on the cake. Repair time is 7-10 working days. That's a fortnight to most of us. To replace a rear bumper outer skin. I could do it myslef in a couple of hours. No flexibility in their process. Car comes in, gets dismantled, bumper painted, "blend into the quarter panels", wait for paint to dry, then fit all back together.

So they intend to paint the rear quarter panels, which is currently factory paint and fine, undamaged. And I'll need a repalcement dual-controlled car for a fortnight.

My suggestion, paint a bumper, then I'll arrive, and wait for a couple of hours while they fit it. No replacement car, simpler and quicker. No, they won't do that. I suggested they could have the fuel filler flap as a match if necessary.

Big complaint to insurance company, they were quite interested about the proposed extra parts and work. Will hopefully hear back tomorrow with practical proposal.
 
We had 1 very nice doctor at our surgery who actually cared, even if he was out with his family and see me out and about he would always ask how i was and stop for a chat.
but because he cared and could not do all he wanted to help people this got to him and made him ill.:mad:

https://www.gponline.com/essex-gp-t...ng-incredibly-pressurised-job/article/1672735

Sadly Dave this is not uncommon in the medical profession :( the government just keeps pushing people till they break
 
Sadly Dave this is not uncommon in the medical profession :( the government just keeps pushing people till they break

It's the same in all government run systems. The willing horses get flogged while the wasters get away with avoiding work. The system actually supports the "do just enoughs". They never step out of line, never make decisions so are never seen to make any mistakes. Guess who gets promoted.

Their career progress stops when they reach a level of incompetence. So higher management is gets populated with under performers.
 
Back
Top