- Joined
- Feb 27, 2012
- Messages
- 950
- Points
- 191
The simple answer to this question is the Austin Princess,
But there are many lower levels of unglyness such as the Ford Scorpio (what were they thinking), the Vauxhall Senator (having a V6 did not even make it any cooler). one of those Ssang Yong 4x4 things (just what), the Chrystler Neon (fast but horrid) and the Toyota Pruis.
The simple answer to this question is the Austin Princess,
But there are many lower levels of unglyness such as the Ford Scorpio (what were they thinking), the Vauxhall Senator (having a V6 did not even make it any cooler). one of those Ssang Yong 4x4 things (just what), the Chrystler Neon (fast but horrid) and the Toyota Pruis.
Then there's the obvious list of cool because they're ugly cars like the Rover SD1 (my favourite), the Austin Montego (the front headrests are fantastic), the Vauxhall Belmont (an astra with a bolted-on ugly bit) the Jaguar XJS (looks like a collective of 70s car bits) and the Ford Orion (doesn't like too bad if you turn around and shut your eyes).
The simple answer to this question is the Austin Princess,
But there are many lower levels of unglyness such as the Ford Scorpio (what were they thinking), the Vauxhall Senator (having a V6 did not even make it any cooler). one of those Ssang Yong 4x4 things (just what), the Chrystler Neon (fast but horrid) and the Toyota Pruis.
Then there's the obvious list of cool because they're ugly cars like the Rover SD1 (my favourite), the Austin Montego (the front headrests are fantastic), the Vauxhall Belmont (an astra with a bolted-on ugly bit) the Jaguar XJS (looks like a collective of 70s car bits) and the Ford Orion (doesn't like too bad if you turn around and shut your eyes).
I think you've missed the mark here. Just because something isn't pretty doesn't mean its ugly the orion, belmont, Senator, neon and prius, they're not really ugly they're just boring in terms of styling
The SD1 was quite a good looking car for its era and the XJS is only let down by replacing the stunning E-type individually its still a nice looking car.
the biggest problem with your post is that you state that the Montego is cool!! I mean really!! where were you in the 80's there is and never has been anything cool or good about a montego, they're not even bad enough looking to call ugly they like the orion and belmont are just bland dull and uninteresting
if you search for this car all you get is links to 'ugliest car' type websites and posts
Don't you mean the Ssangyong Odius? It's like a Dorma Bungalow on wheels.Ssangyong Rhodius anyone? The fugliest by far!
Ugly? I worked for an Opel dealer in the late '70s and the Senator A had a feel of real quality and solidity. In fact it made the 7-Series BMW of the time look a little insubstantial and in appearance seemed to be more of a match for the upper end of the E-Class and bottom tier of S-Class territory. With a little smoothing off at the front and rear it looked better. But, when I saw its replacement, the Senator B, I thought it was, by a long way the best looking large car in Europe.Certainly very low on the beauty scale... -- the yellow ones (with the brown vinyl roof) looked like wedges of cheese....
The Scorpio estate was ever so capacious, though...! Nearly bought one (in black... -- looked like a hearse...): until I discovered more acres of rust underneath than a classic Panda will ever have....
I have to disagree with the Senator. The B version, with the 24v three-litre, was one of the best stealth cars I ever drove. A friend of the family -- who was in charge of a fire-station, several miles away -- had the four-litre (Irmscher?) version. Put a flashing blue light on the top of that, and you soon earned respect!
A little ugly, perhaps; but very high on the legendary Cool Wall (IMHO).![]()
Anyone fancy a 62 Dart.
View attachment 121091
The 2007 M6 doesn't exactly get me going either, very much like the fat but Laguna that came out at a similar time.
View attachment 121092
I quite like both of them. I think there must be something wrong with me![]()
over the pond, they set new standards in uglyness with the pontiac aztec
over the pond, they set new standards in uglyness with the pontiac aztec
![]()
When I have one of my fairly regular "10 cars I'd have in my garage if/when I win the lottery" moments, one of the 2002's big brothers regularly sneaks in there. The 2500/2800/3.0S/3.0Si:I quite like the Dart, too -- and I'm not usually a fan of American chrome... -- but no BMW has done anything for me since the 2002....![]()
You mention the SP250 which, coincidentally, was also known as the Dart, and yes, it was ugly, but it's so individual, it becomes almost handsome the more you see it. Plus, the concept of putting a 2.5 V8 into a small convertible was pretty brave, almost as brave as the styling in factI really despise insurance companies who do 'fun' articles such as this, they just repeat the same old stories as has been mentioned a thousand times before, must take all of 2 minutes to write the piece. Just to get more people on to their website, and so use them.
The Ka was only ugly when it was sold only with the black bumpers, colour coding them made it a reasonable looking car. As shown by their own picture! :bang:
Yes the multipla is ugly, but it's shape is down to function, which was something it was very good at.
The juke/cashcow, actually in fact all nissans are ugly.
Pontiac Aztek isn't really that bad, it's quite bland, but the designers tried to rectify that by moving the lights about...
Daimler SP250 has got to be one of the ugliest cars i can think of at the moment, Would love to drive one, but the outside is horrible! I can think of many cars that are ugly and bland such as late model escorts and cortinas, but just ugly is proving elusive at the moment.
You mention the SP250 which, coincidentally, was also known as the Dart, and yes, it was ugly, but it's so individual, it becomes almost handsome the more you see it. Plus, the concept of putting a 2.5 V8 into a small convertible was pretty brave, almost as brave as the styling in fact