The beam is a torsion beam. Its designed to flex to mimic an independent design. As the beam flexes it "winds" up the torsion in the beam just like a torsion bar, this is where the ARB properties come from. In reality the torsion of the beam is weak as ****. A person can easily twist the beam to full deflection.
Stiffening the beam wont cause the body to crack but it may cause the beam to crack. It will place higher stress on other parts of the beam.
A custom fitted ARB is the better solution. It will leave the beam alone to operate as it was designed and the ARB can do what it is designed to do also.
This man is correct based on what i know
That is all true, but there is nowhere near as much flexing in the beam axle trailing arms compared with the arms of an independent set up, which is why independent rear suspension set ups often have ARB's fitted and rear beam axles don't. The problem with fitting an ARB to a rear beam suspension is that roll bar is having to act against the beam torsion as well as the suspension spring tension, whereas with a fully independent rear suspension it would only be acting against the suspension spring tension.
Ages ago there was someone on here (an Australian I think?) who did manage to fit a rear anti-roll bar to a Uno but suffered from lots of metal fatigue/ cracking where the ends of the anti-roll bar were mounted (on the shell if I recall correctly).
I got this from Wiki regarding an ARB:
"Anti-roll bars provide two main functions. The first function is the reduction of body lean. The reduction of body lean is dependent on the total roll stiffness of the vehicle. Although Anti-roll bars reduce body lean, this comes at the expense of increased weight transfer at the end it is applied to. To keep the body level in cornering, the bar pulls up on the inside tire (therefore under loading it) and pushes on the outside wheel (over loading it). Anti-roll bars therefore reduce overall grip at the end they are installed to".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti_roll_bar
Maybe it's not such a good idea to add an ARB to the rear after all if it loses grip, and maybe that's why Fiat didn't fit one originally? :chin:
correct, anti roll bars do usually reduce grip on the end they are applied to.
However, as with everything to do with car set up its not that simple. We are not actually installing the anti roll bar to work as an anti roll bar at all.
Arb's have to be attached to the
chassis in order to actually function as an arb (using the leverage of the 'loaded' side of the car to push against the 'unloaded' sides suspension
, therefore 'flattening' the car as it corneres).
All the arb is doing in the case of the uno is stregntening the rear beam.
as previously mentioned the tortion beam loads up and twists as force is applied.
The reason that the arb is percived to improve rear end stabillity, is becasue t
he stronger rear beam drives the unloaded tyre into the road harder.
This sacrifices of the maximum grip of the loaded tyre, and transferrs more of the force that is pushing it into the road, to the other side of the car).
This means that :
before the arb was fitted, the loaded rear tyre was providing nearly all the rear end grip through the corner, as it was being driven hard into the ground
(it didnt have to 'share' the force with the unloaded side, beacuse the beam connecting them is too flexible).
The result of this is one side of the car is providing most of the grip of the rear end - if this grip is lost then thats it
, the tortion beam becomes unloaded, and the rear end becomes
very very slippy.
Because this tyre is very close to its adhesion limit it means that this is all too easy to do.
Fitting a stronger or modified rear beam (in this case an 'arb') means that
the unloaded side of the rear axle is driven into the road harder.
This takes away some of the force applied to the outside wheel, and shares it with the inside, so ultimate grip may be lower,
however,
you now have the inside rear wheel gripping (a bit), you have two points of contact on the road, both of which have some tolerance before they reach their adhesion limit, and when they do reach this limit, it isnt as bigger deal as before - the torsion beam requires less 'flex' to load up, it will do it faster, and at a higher road speed, therefore rear grip can be regained more quickly.