General Oxygen sensor

Currently reading:
General Oxygen sensor

Are you an actual mechanic? Or just know a lot about Fiat?

It might be worth a shot for my ease of mind as might be nothing wrong with the car but a good thorough check would be good
Or the other alternative. I do have MES, multi Ecuscan but not sure what I need to look for or test on there.
 
Or the other alternative. I do have MES, multi Ecuscan but not sure what I need to look for or test on there.
Are you using an elm327 Bluetooth dongle with the multiECUscan

If so have you acess to an android

The quickest way to see if the cars running okay is to check the short and long term fuel trims

It's hard to find in multiECUscan and is missing from some models, no idea on the post 2012

The 2 together should be zero give or take 10% hot engine at idle

There's no hills around here that should need first maybe there one near talaca, there one a new brighton that might be a 2nd if you have to go slow
 
Are you using an elm327 Bluetooth dongle with the multiECUscan

If so have you acess to an android

The quickest way to see if the cars running okay is to check the short and long term fuel trims

It's hard to find in multiECUscan and is missing from some models, no idea on the post 2012

The 2 together should be zero give or take 10% hot engine at idle

There's no hills around here that should need first maybe there one near talaca, there one a new brighton that might be a 2nd if you have to go slow
Yes I am using MES with a vLinker MS. Don't need cables it connects to all areas of the car without.

It's not a big hill the road am trying to go up, just a small incline but really struggles.

So what are the fuel trims called on mes? Can I send you a message?
 
Your Oxygen graphic looks very bad. Because yours is the after-cat sensor. And it oscillates as it would be the pre-cat one. The pos-cat voltage should be more steady, it oscillates too, but very small lines. Yours tells that you have no catalytic converter there.
But that is not the reason your engine runs bad. It should run better even without catalytic converter. Something else is wrong there, too.
How much oil is the engine consuming?
PS: I put an O2 graphic with how it normally looks.
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20251109_112352619.MP.jpg
    PXL_20251109_112352619.MP.jpg
    6.8 MB · Views: 7
  • Graphic Lambdas 25 iun 2025.jpg
    Graphic Lambdas 25 iun 2025.jpg
    244.5 KB · Views: 6
Your Oxygen graphic looks very bad. Because yours is the after-cat sensor. And it oscillates as it would be the pre-cat one. The pos-cat voltage should be more steady, it oscillates too, but very small lines. Yours tells that you have no catalytic converter there.
But that is not the reason your engine runs bad. It should run better even without catalytic converter. Something else is wrong there, too.
How much oil is the engine consuming?
PS: I put an O2 graphic with how it normally looks.
Why, I no idea how you have come to this conclusion, maybe I missing something

Look at the time frame

It's isolating at 5 seconds peak to peak

Which is about right for a constant throttle while driving

It will go lean as you take the foot off the throttle
It will go rich as you push the gas down

Without knowing the load at the time the graph is meaningless, the sample rate is also very low

If I was to hazard a guess I would say the catalytic converter isn't a problem and be looking elsewhere, I the last 10 years I know of one effect drivability,.it usually picked up at an MOT well before it's an issue

The graph you posted is at idle no load, totally different and is from a Punto not running correctly anyhow

I often make mistakes or overlook something, I just don't see what I have got wrong here
 
And would I need to do a phonic relearn after the timing belt was adjusted as the garage has told me they didn't do it.
 
And would I need to do a phonic relearn after the timing belt was adjusted as the garage has told me they didn't do it.
It's supposed to be done according to the fiat documentation

I change the belt without loosening the camshaft pulley, belts are pretty accurate so never seen the point

If the pulley has been loosen (likely) then a phonics relearn would be advisable

It's pretty simple to do, as long as the engine is up to temperature and revs freely,
 
Why, I no idea how you have come to this conclusion, maybe I missing something

Look at the time frame

It's isolating at 5 seconds peak to peak

Which is about right for a constant throttle while
That would be fine if it would be the pre-cat sensor.
But it's the after-cat. It oscillates just like a pre-cat, like there's no catalytic converter.
 
That would be fine if it would be the pre-cat sensor.
But it's the after-cat. It oscillates just like a pre-cat, like there's no catalytic converter.
It's not following the pre cat
Look at the time frame

PXL_20251109_101730501~4.jpg


PXL_20251109_112352619.MP~2.jpg


Pre cat 02 has a frequency of 1.5-2 htz depending on rpm

Without the road speed, engine RPM, throttle position there's not a lot to be gained looking at graph

Multiecuscan frame rate is normally too slow to come to any conclusions

The cars is possibly not running correctly, pops from the exhaust, vibration and down on power

If unburnt air and fuel is entering the system the CAT will not be able to cope, looking at the post cat 02 will be meaningless

I don't understand how you can come to the conclusion to call the CAT a £120+ part from the data we have

It may or may not be working correctly, we just don't have the correct infromation
 
Back
Top