have done, btw whats your average MPG?
Our 1.6 has them too - again, flatspots gone, MPG increased . . .
Same effect on our BMW 5-Series too, 3 out of 3 cars improved.
have done, btw whats your average MPG?
have done, btw whats your average MPG?
have done, btw whats your average MPG?
Been driving the 5dr again this weekend, the 1.6 feels faster than mine on a flat (an illusion I'm sure), but you really notice it when it's trying to pull - and I miss my VVT!
Trip computer read 32.6mpg when I looked - thats round town, with my mum driving it for 2 mins to work (wet weather) mostly and me this weekend. Sometimes, it goes to the supermarket.
Can't complain, my 1.8 gets around 27 with me at the helm![]()
Both a lot less economical than my Abarth then
I get about 35-36 even including 'around town'.
Along with Lee, this thread has now confused me over which spark plug is best?!
-Alex
Just to take the confusion a bit further...
What about Denso?
http://aftermarket.denso-europe.com/Spark-Plugs---1000620000000001.aspx
I have the opportunity to get these. Has anyone any experience?
Morten.
Personally i find NGKs at 0.9mm gap (.035") work much better on my 1.6 than the gap they are shipped out at of 0.8mm.
My plugs were changed at service interval last time, to NGK Fiat/Lanica brand. These have most likely 0.8 mm gap. And using NGK's search engine I find new plugs, both standard and iridium, shipping at 0.8 mm gap.
But using Denso's search engine, the gap is 0.9 mm. I am planning to buy and test the Denso plugs...
So what is the benefits of this microscopic increase in gap length? And why do they produce plugs with different gap lengths to the same engine / car?
Morten.
replaced spark plugs with bosch ones (thanks to pnl), however no joy- didnt improve performance at all. :bang:
Very illustrating answer, Phil.But using my anti-engineering mind, I think this would delay ze big bang aswell as it has to jump longer.
M.
replaced spark plugs with bosch ones (thanks to pnl), however no joy- didnt improve performance at all. :bang: