Released today ...
Last edited:
There's loads of footage of the Twin Towers, would be difficult to find anything thats not already been seen I think, still, this one hasn't been seen by the public till today.
Its obviously only a snippet of the full footage too, makes you wonder what they are STILL holding back and why?Very strange. There's many hours of footage taken from many, many cameras all out there on the web & yet they have held this little bit back all these years.
Its obviously only a snippet of the full footage too, makes you wonder what they are STILL holding back and why?
The Americans have never had a problem sacrificing their own in order to fuel a war. Never happy unless they are killing some poor underdogs.
While I don't doubt for one moment that the Bush administration would have had no qualms about sacrificing innocent life for their own nefarious purposes, there is absolutely zero evidence that 9/11 was ever such a case. Every single conspiracy theory has been debunked by independent experts, and also totally fails to take into account the vast number of people you wold need to involve in a conspiracy of this size. it would take literaly thousands of people to plan this, and not one of them has ever decided to blow the whistle?
yeah, right![]()
How many?
Perhaps you should go off and read up on Pearl Harbour.
The Americans were desperate to get involved in WW2 and needed an 'in'. They had advance notice of the attack - at least 3 days before it happened, plenty of time to withdraw personnel - yet they preferred to sit back and wait.
The twin towers was only the worst terrorist attack because of sheer numbers of innocents involved and the size of the structures coupled with the immense amount of time it took for events to pan out from the initial impact.
How different is it to organise, say, the london tube bombings or bus bombings? The only difference being that the devastation was instant rather than panning out over hours and hours with hundreds of news crews 'exciting' things up
I don't understand what you're getting at here. What does 9/11 have to do with Pearl Harbour?
Most 9/11 conspiracy theories suggest that the entire thing was staged by the Bush administration to give the excuse needed for messed up wars in the middle east. But there is zero forensic or scientific evidence to support these theories. There was an excellent documentary on Channel 4 about this not so long ago. I'll see if I can find a link![]()
I don't understand what you're getting at here. What does 9/11 have to do with Pearl Harbour?
Without wanting to get into it all again, I think the greatest thing that the US Government managed after 9/11 was to convince the world that anyone who doesn't believe the official account is either crazy or is pissing all over the graves of the victims....
Personally I think anyone who takes the official account as gospel are the crazy ones.
![]()
all im going to say, is that the twin towers are the first concrete and steel made buildings in history to collapse through fire.
If all you guys want to ignore the wholly INDEPENDENT mechanical, scientific and engineering evidence then be my guest.![]()
But the 9/11 conspiracy theorists don't stop there. They believe the entire attack was actually an iside job and the the towers were laced with high explosives (totally unoticed by anybody), then detonated by US agents. And this really is just the tip of the iceberg. For every theory debunked by the experts they will find a new one.