Mounted police charging London students.

Currently reading:
Mounted police charging London students.

Have to agree with you Beard. Non-degrees are of little/no advantage to either the country, and also i'm struggling to find a use for the graduates of such degrees other than being able to say they have a degree. If it was cut back to more proper courses, the money may be more available to have a fairer system, i doubt 100 media studies students would be as much use as a single Engineering student.

Enough of talking sense.

This video is pretty interesting of the police dealing with a definite threat. last week.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11993680
 
Political dogma has a lot to answer for. In the days of the Thatcher Government there was a reduction in the number of unemployed because after 1 year they went onto another register, hence: No longer unemployed.

With the last lot, instead of trying to save businesses like Rover and LDV vans, they just created a load of publicly funded jobs and more University places.

A prime example of publicly funded jobs would be the South Manchester Diabetic Retinopathy Team - notice the use of the power word "Team". This was apparently set up after a number of breast cancer scans were mis-diagnosed and quite a few women were told they were clear of cancer, only to contract the illness. All well and good you might think, except that in this case the procedure for diabetic eyetests was as follows:

1) Go to your local optician and ask for a diabetic eyesight test.

2) Have test and be told by optician if everything was ok or not.

Present procedure.

1) Go to your local optician and be told to phone the S.M.D.R.T.

2) S.M.D.R.T. will write to you with a patient number and a nice full colour
brochure telling you everything the optician would tell you and includes
a list of opticians, one of which you will already have spoken to.

3) Have your eyetest.

4) The optician then sends the images to the S.M.D.R.T.

5) The S.M.D.R.T. then sends the images to another optician who checks
them and sends his results back to the S.M.D.R.T.

6) The S.M.D.R.T. then writes to you and tells you exactly what the optician
told you two weeks earlier.

There you have it, why use one person when a dozen will do. That's one way of dealing with job losses in the private sector; create them in the public sector instead.
 
Why use one person where a dozen will do?
That sounds a bit like it used to be in China.
Airport immigration routine:
1. 1 person to take health declaration form off you and out it in a big box.
2. 1 person to take customs declaration form off you
3.1 person to look at it, then put it in a box
4. 1 person to take passport off you and enter your details
5. 1 person to have another look at your visa and the PC screen
6. 1 person to hand passport back and let you in
7 Many persons to take your luggage tag and check that it matches the luggage you have picked up.
But this was a communist country trying to keep 1.2Bn people out of trouble and asking too many questions.
Now the routine is simple and the above cast of thousands is cut by around 75% because they don't support non-jobs any more.
Ironic really isn't it?
China going up in the world (but far from perfect)
Us, dropping like a stone.
 
Why use one person where a dozen will do?
That sounds a bit like it used to be in China.
Airport immigration routine:
1. 1 person to take health declaration form off you and out it in a big box.
It must be terrible to be Gay in China.As if it's not bad enough living in totalitarian state, you run the risk of being taken to a big box and then have everyone else told of your private life.
 
Back
Top