I think that's part of it. Driving style has a substantial effect on suspension component life. Driven gently, the suspension parts in the 1.2 Panda can run 100k+ and still be MOT-worthy. I know this, because I've done it.Maybe the "type" of driver Panda generally the silver hair brigade 500 often newly passed drivers and the type of driving-to the shops or bowling and back or round town off to friends work etc?
Almost all 169's were sold with the 60HP engine, which doesn't encourage or need to be revved as highly as the 69HP VVT unit in the 1.2 500. Most of the Pandas sold were the base model 1.1/1.2 versions, running on 13" wheels and skinny tyres, so the Panda suspension, whilst using the same or similar parts, isn't as highly stressed. The 500 sells on looks, not price, and many cars were specified with larger wheels & wider tyres, so it's not that surprising that suspension parts which are just about adequate for the Panda are failing prematurely on 500's.
Also, although the cars in basic form share perhaps 90% of the mechanical parts, it's the 10% that are different that give rise to many of 500 issues we see here. Hatch wiring issues and dashboard electronic failures have caused a lot of grief to 500 owners; something that's almost never seen in the Panda section. And when cambelt change time comes, the quirky belt change procedure for the VVT engine gives endless oppportunities for both DIY types and independent garages to go wrong and get into difficulties.
Last edited: