HAHAHAHAHAHA

ok dave, what say you? in my opinion they must have some degree of performance upgrade over the standard setup, even if it is just better at filtering the air? the bmc does seem a fancy way of just having a pannel filter in a standard air box
at least the k&n is "open" abet alittle exposed to the elephants (elements

). the old paper setup must be starving the engine of free flowing air?
the filter being 'open' is a bad thing in the case of the k&n, all it does is stuck hot air from the engine bay, and those 'cold air feeds' do absolutely nothing.
the paper filter doesn't starve the engine of air. the intake system on the car has had £millions spent on research and development to get the best from the engine for its intended use. just bolting on a cone filter doesn't give u an instant power boost.
however, a well thought out and designed intake system can give good improvements over standard.
some food for thought here....... on most cars the best intake improvement is just a replacement panel filter from the likes of k&n or ITG, this has been proven many times.
personally i've used several options over the years, all on my HGT in this case. i've had standard, modified airbox (drilled) with paper element, k&n 57i and finally my current GSR.
of these the GSR is the best, but only because it is able to flow more air at high rpm (6000+) meaning the car is developing power right up to the rev limiter. 2nd would be the drilled airbox, there is almost no noticeable difference in the mid-range between this and the GSR. fitting a k&n panel would have helped improve the top end bringing it closer to the GSR's performance, although the GSR would still be better by design.
as for the k&N 57i, i removed this to modify my standard airbox as the drilled airbox (and even the standard one in the midrange) was noticeable better for performance.
i hope this helps u make the right decision, my money would be going on a replacement panel filter, unless u can get a GSR then think it would just come down to budget