The 200 does 12 and 24 volt batteries whereas the 100 only does 12 volt. 24 volts is of no interest to me though. However the 200 has a colour screen display which looks nicer and has come out as a more accurate device in a couple of detailed tests I've read. Also, on the likes of ebay, there seems to be offers on both which brings the price differential to typically around £8 between them and for that I'd rather have the colour display. I'm moving away from the Foxwell as it's considerably more cash and only has a monochrome screen. Don't know if it's more accurate though. I'm in no hurry so will investigate some more.
BT 100: https://eu.topdon.com/products/bt10...5GdOJU0STngR3b8Ld9vGcgGzKr3cX0_Fkvbi4Xt_YViar
BT 200: https://eu.topdon.com/products/bt20...6cLRPDeoGBO9AVJgSy2s6y530jQqrqYVZ97gzb_uCZuDR
I was very tempted to do this but I don't like the idea of an unsecured battery in the boot or the possibility of accidental acid contamination of something like some good clothes etc. Also it's heavy - I'm thinking of the havoc it could cause in a serious accident. so just doesn't make much sense.
I used my tester along with a separate battery repair charger and watched a battery go from 0% health back up to 90%, in stages like 12%, 33%, 64% etc. It appears to be very accurate.
I used my tester along with a separate battery repair charger and watched a battery go from 0% health back up to 90%, in stages like 12%, 33%, 64% etc. It appears to be very accurate.
Oh yes. Topdon is a name which seems to have "exploded" onto the automotive electronics scene over the last few years. They seem well regarded and have a big catalogue of much more "technical" gear than these battery analysers.