I don't think anyone misunderstood what he said, it's pretty clear.
Perhaps by wanky he means a bit OTT. But, he *might* have criticised the Abarth, so feel free to jump down his throat.
I don't think anyone misunderstood what he said, it's pretty clear.
Perhaps by wanky he means a bit OTT. But, he *might* have criticised the Abarth, so feel free to jump down his throat.
The only thing I don't like about the Abarth is that it looks a bit wanky. A Lounge with Abarth engine and suspension - now that would be cool!
*puts Abarth defending hat on*Ahh, there is someone else who thinks this. I was worried it was only me. Abarth is definitely a bit wanky. The Abarth goodies in a standard 500, now that would be great.
If what is meant by wanky is: "Indulgent, pretentious, simultaneously showy and useless." (Taken from urbandictionary.com) then I have to disagree.
Looks very nice, its what it does.
that ridiculous looking rev counter and shift light on the end of a stick.
It would be nice if you yelled "FIRE IN THE HOLE" before you did that in the futureTo make it clear: I think the Abarth500 looks like a car that a 15 year old boy would have a **** over, thus it looks wanky. Unlike the Fiat 500, it just lacks style.
Have I made myself clear this time?
Rev counter is the same as the standard 500 Don't you mean the Turbo boost gauge If your going to slate something at least know what your actually slating otherwise you look like a tit
Define wanky please, looks are the deciding factor for most people when they consider a new car, the Abarth 500 is no different, in fact, most people think it's a stunning looking car, as do I!
To make it clear: I think the Abarth500 looks like a car that a 15 year old boy would have a **** over, thus it looks wanky. Unlike the Fiat 500, it just lacks style.
Have I made myself clear this time?
I think the Abarth500 looks like a car that a 15 year old boy would have a **** over, thus it looks wanky.
Look at this 1970s Abarth 500 from this thread: https://www.fiatforum.com/members-motors/130423-my-other-500s.html
Doesn't that look more like a new lounge than a new A500?
Look at this 1970s Abarth 500 from this thread: https://www.fiatforum.com/members-motors/130423-my-other-500s.html
Doesn't that look more like a new lounge than a new A500?
No, to me it looks like a standard Classic 500 with an Abarth badge
This is a Classic Abarth 500:
The Abarth looks like a 500 that's crashed through a chavs accesories shop to me. The silly badges in odd locations, the over the top vinyl sticker-fest, the goofy front seats and the contrasting stitching in the leather, that ridiculous looking rev counter and shift light on the end of a stick. It's just....tacky. The standard 500 is a more complete package, as in it looks like it was designed to be that way, not just having taken something and tarted it up. Ironic really given that it's a panda underneath.
hmmmm let me see...regular 500 or an abarth 500, complete with the 'silly' abarth badges, 'goofy' red leather seats and the 'ridiculous looking rev counter' thats on every model in the range anyway. oh, and a crappy turbo and crap suspension as well, no doubt.
wow, its a tough one but i think i'll take the abarth. oh wait, actually i have already. thank goodness for that.