Technical 46 mpg

Currently reading:
Technical 46 mpg

Scd

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
121
Points
35
Location
Bedfordshire
Hi there , got a 1.2 2008 gp and can't help but keep looking at my mpg . At the min I'm getting 46 mpg on a normal drive and 49 mpg on the motorway ... ;)
 
Hi there , got a 1.2 2008 gp and can't help but keep looking at my mpg . At the min I'm getting 46 mpg on a normal drive and 49 mpg on the motorway ... ;)
That's really good!
Our 1.2 averages about 42mpg overall over a few thousand miles.
 
Driven VERY carefully I've achieved 60mpg but my wife threatens to get out (whilst I'm moving....it wouldn't hurt) if I carry on driving so slowly......I'm able to get 46mpg when she's not a passenger and I'm flying up the motorway or round London streets.
So, you see, it really depends on how hard you drive the thing, and you dont have to drive it much over 55mph to have a significant effect on fuel consumption.
But the VED is only £30 so keep smiling.
 
I can only get 41mpg max out of my twinair+. If a rally it I get 38mpg. God knows how to achieve 50+ mpg

Cheers
 
I can only get 41mpg max out of my twinair+. If a rally it I get 38mpg. God knows how to achieve 50+ mpg

Cheers

No need to trade it in, I'm seeing 44MPG on my two month old TA, driven hard with bursts of hypermiling to make up for it (eg in traffic). A/C uses 4-5MPG so once I can switch that off I'll be seeing 48-49. Once broken in 50+ should be easy.
 
I can only get 41mpg max out of my twinair+. If a rally it I get 38mpg. God knows how to achieve 50+ mpg

Cheers

Seen a few people say this. By comparison our Abarth, which still has a tight engine with under 1500 miles on it, is getting 32 driven with some spirit around town and 42 on a run...
 
It's also got a lot to do with your local 'terrain' and they type of journeys you do.
I can get as much as 62mpg on a 200 mile journey or as low as 38mpg from my TA.
It's driving style combined with the type of terrain, flat, hilly, lots of junctions etc...
Strangely, I find 'eco' mode makes more difference on the m'way than around town.
 
Last edited:
A/C uses 4-5MPG so once I can switch that off I'll be seeing 48-49.

Rubbish, I've yet to see anything concrete to support this, both from personal experience and that of many others. A modern AC system will have very little effect on a vehicles MPG.

You know it switches off when it's cold outside right? :rolleyes:

You know it then kicks back in when the temp going through the internal condenser increases to the correct temp right? :rolleyes:
 
Rubbish, I've yet to see anything concrete to support this, both from personal experience and that of many others. A modern AC system will have very little effect on a vehicles MPG.



You know it then kicks back in when the temp going through the internal condenser increases to the correct temp right? :rolleyes:

Apparently people in Suffolk drive around in temperatures that might be below freezing and then wonder why the A/C has little effect on MPG. If you live in England and have the climate on all the time, what would be the A/C's duty cycle over a year's driving? Maybe 30%? 30% of 4MPG is about 1MPG. Doesn't change the fact that when the compressor is actually ON, it's consuming 4-5MPG or 0.6-0.8L/Hr at idle. Obviously duty cycle is what's going to determine the A/C's effect on MPG. Since I run the A/C in summer at or close to 100% duty cycle it's using the full 4-5MPG. So yes, if someone say's they've got their A/C on 'all the time', I find that funny, particularly as it relates to MPG.
 
Last edited:
0.6-0.8 Litres per hour according to the OBD, or 4-5 MPG @30mph.

It's certainly makes a difference to the IC display in the car, which reads lower when it's on. I also think that I remember previous generation Fords, and perhaps the Panda too, coming with low resistance tyres and no AC to get the emissions below the magic 100 mark.
 
So yes, if someone say's they've got their A/C on 'all the time', I find that funny, particularly as it relates to MPG.

I'm sorry, but in my experience a/c doesn't use 4-5mpg....

It's certainly makes a difference to the IC display in the car, which reads lower when it's on. I also think that I remember previous generation Fords, and perhaps the Panda too, coming with low resistance tyres and no AC to get the emissions below the magic 100 mark.

A/C uses more fuel than most people think; the amount depends on the cooling effect that is needed. The amount of extra fuel used depends on the work done by the compressor; its effect on mpg, in percentage terms, also depends on how effectively you use the rest of your fuel, so if you drive economically, you'll notice a greater percentage difference. On both my cars, running with the A/C on in summer reduces my fuel economy by 6-10mpg.

The extra fuel used by running the A/C depends on the time it's running, not the mileage covered. UFI's figures of 0.6-0.8l/hr sound about right; on that basis, pressing the button costs you about £1/ hr.
 
Do remember that even on a hot day, the A/C compressor won't be running (and therefore drawing load from the engine) for more than 50% of the time, otherwise the evaporator will be frozen solid. (providing the correct amount of refrigerant is in the system).

As you're driving along, you'll hear the compressor clutch clicking on and off as the system is controlled in a feedback loop.
 
Back
Top