It is easy to believe various conspiracy theories and so on, guess time will tell, at this time this is my take on it from a very broad country wide view: when this all kicked off there was considerable concern about who should be most worried and so on, and of course how quickly might we overwhelm the NHS, given that it was fairly well known that good intensive care was the key to saving the most poorly.
Around that was doubt as to exactly how easy it was to spread the virus, the obvious thing being a full lock down to prevent it, that's an experiment only Italy had much started by then.
So now we know a great deal more and reading between the lines and listening to the proper scientists (rather than Facebook), and other observations, it seems likely that the there is (or was!) a % of the population, heavily biased towards older people, who are reactors, unfortunately, to the virus, and they will likely have been through the health care system now and hopefully still with us on the whole, especially those from care homes.
That and ever increasing herd immunity (though not enough based on previous viruses), and the now certain knowledge that young people really essentially personally not affected, and the collateral damage to health and wellbeing due to restrictions, and I certainly believe that we are doing the right thing to reduce lock down.
Resolving to the 2m rule or face masks, well that is a risk reduction, not removal, and a minor one in the bigger picture. It is actually beneficial if an otherwise healthy number of people continue to get this as that will ultimately protect the not so healthy or reactors.
Around that was doubt as to exactly how easy it was to spread the virus, the obvious thing being a full lock down to prevent it, that's an experiment only Italy had much started by then.
So now we know a great deal more and reading between the lines and listening to the proper scientists (rather than Facebook), and other observations, it seems likely that the there is (or was!) a % of the population, heavily biased towards older people, who are reactors, unfortunately, to the virus, and they will likely have been through the health care system now and hopefully still with us on the whole, especially those from care homes.
That and ever increasing herd immunity (though not enough based on previous viruses), and the now certain knowledge that young people really essentially personally not affected, and the collateral damage to health and wellbeing due to restrictions, and I certainly believe that we are doing the right thing to reduce lock down.
Resolving to the 2m rule or face masks, well that is a risk reduction, not removal, and a minor one in the bigger picture. It is actually beneficial if an otherwise healthy number of people continue to get this as that will ultimately protect the not so healthy or reactors.