smartwitness seem to have no mention of this incident at all on there website so I'm not sure exactly where they supposedly released it, that said you should consider a company which sell equipment to help reduce insurance claims and bills may have a vested interest in claiming that the driver was 'cleared of blame'
The article states no claim was made against the driver, that's not to say the claim wasn't dealt with on a 50/50 basis and that the haulage firm May had to have foot the bill for any damage to the truck.
One article doesn't necessarily give the full facts, and take everything you read with a pinch of salt especially if the person saying is trying to make money from their claims
http://www.smartwitness.co.uk/article/74/case-studies
Case study 3
And now mentioned on the honest John website
http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/news/mi...saves-trucker-from-expensive-insurance-claim/