Ypsilon better than 500 for a man?

[FiatFan2012]

Here is the two vehicles side by side.

Mito Vehicle Summary Performance & Economy

Fuel consumption (urban) 36.7 mpg
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 58.9 mpg
Fuel consumption (combined) 47.9 mpg
0 - 62 mph 11.2 seconds
Top speed 112 mph
Cylinders 4
Valves 16 v
Engine power 95 bhp
Engine torque 92 lbs/ft
Dry weight 1080 kgs


Bravo Vehicle Summary Performance & Economy

Fuel consumption (urban) 40.9 mpg
Fuel consumption (extra urban) 65.7 mpg
Fuel consumption (combined) 53.3 mpg
0 - 62 mph 10.5 seconds
Top speed 120 mph
Cylinders 4
Valves 8 v
Engine power 120 bhp
Engine torque 188 lbs/ft
Dry weight 1368 kgs

Will the performance of the Mito feel dreadful compared to the Bravo? Bear in mind i don't rag my Bravo, not by any means, I like a smooth drive and I usually drive with economy in mind.

What do you all think?

Info's from Autotrader.

Thanks.

 

[T14086]

My wife is fed up or hearing about it!!

As long as it's a 'nice' colour she won't mind what car you get

(Ypsilon range needs a bigger engine version in it's range, 1.4 Tjet or 1.6 diesel)

 

[FiatFan2012]

Indeed T14086 indeed...

 

[FiatFan2012]

Im right in saying it will have substantially more performance than the 500's 69hp 1.2 though? Aren't I...?

 

[raton_laveur]

The new Panda is pretty cool, go have a look. Lots more space inside than a 500.

The Y is ugly.

Then again, you can always go for a Qubo as long as you spring for the 95 HP Multijet.

 

[Venters]

Im right in saying it will have substantially more performance than the 500's 69hp 1.2 though? Aren't I...?

The extra weight of the Ypsilon brings it closer than you would think.