Something strange there thenas mine has no trouble at all with emissions (and has an AT generic map). They give a full refund within 2 weeks but outside that I'm sure they would have been happy to install a lower performance version at no extra cost. :chin:
A generic map is based on a good running version of the same engine. You can still have different variants of the same map (such as one based on performance or economy etc.)
A live map is done in conjunction with a rolling road and requires a lot of skill. These types of maps can generate the highest possible gains but they also have the potential to create the greatest number of problems. This is particularly true when engines are mapped that already have existing defects. The map is also dynamic in the sense that if something which affects performance is changed then you should really have another mapping session.
Good generic maps are immune to these issues.
That's generally right but you shouldn't assume a live map will produce poor mpg (depending on the tuner it may even be better) and also remember generic maps offer a massive improvement, over standard, anyway which is very often combined with better 'driveability'. Personally, I'd say live maps are more for track day usage and out and out enthusiasts who have modded their motors quite a bit.Sorry for all the questions but thinking about having a remap on a new car in the new year.
That's generally right but you shouldn't assume a live map will produce poor mpg
I guess the fuel you use in it would make a big difference to a car with this sort of remap?
My Coupe is modified and live mapped. I would recommend running on the fuel of choice at the time of the map. Having said that, mine runs happily on 97 and 95 RON fuel. But having spent thousands on mods and re-map, why would I put cheaper fuel in, so I don't normally.