Technical  Setting (non-electronic ignition) Timing with Strobe light

Currently reading:
Technical  Setting (non-electronic ignition) Timing with Strobe light

romniox789

Member
Joined
May 3, 2026
Messages
61
Points
71
Location
UK
I recently bought a 499cc 110F and have had to replace the carb (it has a new, stock Weber 26) and a refurbed distributor with new points and condensor (properly gapped) so I am setting the car up again. I think I've got the carb about right - 1.5 turns on the mixture seems to run nicely, idilng according to my electronic tacho at about 800 give or take 50rpm. Much lower on the idle or the mixture and it starts to cough.

But with timing I'm really quite confused. I got the car running by setting static 10 degrees. Now I have a strobe light, and the timing plate and I don't know how I should be aduusting.

What timing mark should the strobe show at my 800rpm idle - 10 degrees, 0 degrees, something else?
What should the idle speed even be? There's nothing in my haynes and nothing in the workshop manual I can see (maybe I'm looking in the wrong place!)
How does the 28 degree mark factor into anything - when should the strobe light align to that?
I presume the 28 degree mark is the fabled 18 degrees that I keep reading about on top of the 10 baseline?

Many thanks for any help to solve my confusion...!
 
Model
110 F 499cc
Year
1972
I recently bought a 499cc 110F and have had to replace the carb (it has a new, stock Weber 26) and a refurbed distributor with new points and condensor (properly gapped) so I am setting the car up again. I think I've got the carb about right - 1.5 turns on the mixture seems to run nicely, idilng according to my electronic tacho at about 800 give or take 50rpm. Much lower on the idle or the mixture and it starts to cough.

But with timing I'm really quite confused. I got the car running by setting static 10 degrees. Now I have a strobe light, and the timing plate and I don't know how I should be aduusting.

What timing mark should the strobe show at my 800rpm idle - 10 degrees, 0 degrees, something else?
What should the idle speed even be? There's nothing in my haynes and nothing in the workshop manual I can see (maybe I'm looking in the wrong place!)
How does the 28 degree mark factor into anything - when should the strobe light align to that?
I presume the 28 degree mark is the fabled 18 degrees that I keep reading about on top of the 10 baseline?

Many thanks for any help to solve my confusion...!
Not wishing to muddy the waters too much , but the earliest book I have is the Fiat 126 in 1977, as you can see under electrical system it gives advance details at certain rpm's plus the static timing mark and mentions that centrifugal advance starts around 1200 prm, so if your idle speed is fairly slow then the static timing mark should be a guide as in 10degrees that you had set.
However if distributor and balance weight springs worn then advance can be earlier and higher.
Also note with modern lower Octane fuels use these figure as a base point and judge better when on road test, re pinking etc.
I am sure @the hobbler will be able to give more accurate guidance.
By the way if you have a fancy timing light with advance settings etc. make sure you adjust accordingly. Personally I prefer the old basic strobe light and mark the crank pulley at the degrees you wish to check re full advance etc.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF2647.JPG
    DSCF2647.JPG
    3.6 MB · Views: 17
No fancy gun, just a simple flashing or not flashing :)

Its a refurbed distributor so nothing worn (last distributor all springs worn, advance was all over the place, it wouldn't retard properly etc). I've carefully set tappets, plugs, points gap etc. Also I've been told to only put the super-unleaded in it (with additive) so that's what I've been doing.
 
No fancy gun, just a simple flashing or not flashing :)

Its a refurbed distributor so nothing worn (last distributor all springs worn, advance was all over the place, it wouldn't retard properly etc). I've carefully set tappets, plugs, points gap etc. Also I've been told to only put the super-unleaded in it (with additive) so that's what I've been doing.
@the hobbler is better to advise specifically on this model, but I would mark the TDC point with Tippex and the max advance position by marking the pulley and see what results you get at the higher rev position, bearing in mind if engine recent over haul not to hold revs for long.
 
Still struggling. If idle is 700, ignition is about 5 degrees. At 800’ish it is about 10 degrees. Feels like it hunts a bit on idle.

Anyone know what figures I should be aiming for?
 
Still struggling. If idle is 700, ignition is about 5 degrees. At 800’ish it is about 10 degrees. Feels like it hunts a bit on idle.

Anyone know what figures I should be aiming for?
You could try carefully advancing the ignition with engine on correct idle speed to see if it improves re "hunting", but as I mentioned before due to modern fuels I would advise final setting after or during a road test with engine warm to eliminate any "pinking" under load.
Hunting at idle may be nothing to do with the timing.:)
 
Great to be reading about someone doing traditional timing as I learned to do it so many years ago. This thread may help: https://www.fiatforum.com/threads/help-setting-ignition-timing-on-fiat-500-f.226412/

I also found this video which is the only one I've found so far and does leave a bit to be desired regarding clarity of what to do but has a lot of interesting points for you if you already have a good basic understanding of what you're trying to achieve: I really like that degree tool he got made.

A lot of engines from this era - ie not just this Fiat - were static timed. so if your distributor is in good condition it should run well when just static timed. Of course there's nothing like then doing a dynamic check with the strobe to check it's actually throwing in advance to spec. I still have a couple of strobe guns with one being a "cheapie" like his in the video and one being a high quality Crypton. If working on an engine I didn't have "history" with, I used to like to observe the dynamic timing at varying revs before setting points or trying ti time it up to see if the advance "danced" around as this would be a good indicator of wear. One of the worst offenders I used to regularly encounter was the dizzy in the wee Vauxhalls, Viva etc, which had a short shaft so any wear in the bushings resulted in a lot of shaft wobble rendering setting of points almost impossible and made a nonsense of the timing and so destroyed smooth running, fuel economy and power production generally.

Good luck with it all. I'll enjoy seeing how you get on.

Edit. I should have added in above that although setting points gap statically with feelers, I would always then check with a dwell meter. Dwell is really important for recovery time between sparks for the coil so an engine running the correct dwell, even if the distributor is slightly worn, will run better than one set just with feelers. Having said that though, the dwell angle on a twin must be massive compared to a 4 cylinder so this aspect is probably of little concern. However having said that I'd still be checking dwell just in case there's something "funny" going on.

Another wee Edit. Can I endorse what Mike has to say above regarding quality of modern fuel. So yes I agree to run the "super" E5 fuel especially as these engines are air cooled so, as with all air cooled units, they will tend to "suffer" from potential hot spots in the combustion chamber to a much greater degree than a similar water cooled unit. I run E5 in all my elderly horticultural stuff (my hobby) which are all air cooled, for this reason and also because, with less ethanol in it, there's much less likelyhood of it attacking something in the fuel system I didn't know was susceptible to degradation by ethanol. From reports I've read some of the E5 fuels contain almost no ethanol at all - although how you can tell when you're buying it I don't know.
 
Last edited:
I know very little about dwell, so will start researching that now - thank you!

You are 100% right about wear on the distributor. It’s something I’m surprised isn’t discussed more - as it has a catastrophic effect on performance. I spent a week troubleshooting, finding lots of other problems (which were good to solve) – but the root cause of my issues were down to the distributor not reliably retarding. So no matter what I did with the car, it always appeared as if the mixture had changed or the timing was out as I could set it up to run, and then find after a short trip up the road it was all messed up again!

A refurbished distributor has transformed the car, so it’s now just down to final tweaks really. It’s just that I am a little uncomfortable at trying to solve for too many variables at once - idle, mixture, and timing. I’m really surprised at how hard it is to find a reliable idling number!

Regarding your comments about it being nice to see someone trying to make points and condenser work, thank you for the encouragement – that’s nice to read. I’m keen to prove to myself that I can make the car run as well as it did when it was produced 50 years ago. The beauty of the 500 for me is in its simplicity (and of course it’s iconic design), and I get a lot of satisfaction when I solve a problem! And I have lots of little problems to solve on this car :)

Edit: regarding fuel, I think super unleaded is the easiest choice to make – I’ve bought some lead additive to as I can’t tell whether they’ve fixed their head on it for unleaded or not. My latest discovery was that some fuel hose I bought from an automotive store just a couple of weeks ago has softened resulting in the introduction of a little bit of air – I was shocked, and of course the mixture went to the wall! I need to find out if there’s some sort of standard for fuel hose. I would rather get rid of black hose I’ve had to use temporarily and go back to transparent hose if I can, simply because I can see air bubbles easier and realise there’s a problem!
 
I know very little about dwell, so will start researching that now - thank you!

You are 100% right about wear on the distributor. It’s something I’m surprised isn’t discussed more - as it has a catastrophic effect on performance. I spent a week troubleshooting, finding lots of other problems (which were good to solve) – but the root cause of my issues were down to the distributor not reliably retarding. So no matter what I did with the car, it always appeared as if the mixture had changed or the timing was out as I could set it up to run, and then find after a short trip up the road it was all messed up again!

A refurbished distributor has transformed the car, so it’s now just down to final tweaks really. It’s just that I am a little uncomfortable at trying to solve for too many variables at once - idle, mixture, and timing. I’m really surprised at how hard it is to find a reliable idling number!

Regarding your comments about it being nice to see someone trying to make points and condenser work, thank you for the encouragement – that’s nice to read. I’m keen to prove to myself that I can make the car run as well as it did when it was produced 50 years ago. The beauty of the 500 for me is in its simplicity (and of course it’s iconic design), and I get a lot of satisfaction when I solve a problem! And I have lots of little problems to solve on this car :)
I really enjoyed reading your reply.

Dwell? It's more important than the points gap. Although, if set correctly on a distributor in good mechanical condition then the dwell should be acceptable. Also it requires a Dwell Meter. I may be telling you stuff you already know here - if so apologies - but others may be interested too? So, what's this "dwell" thing? And please Mike or others, do join in if you want to contradict/modify what I'm saying here. So, Dwell? When the points close battery current flows through the ignition coil, across the points and goes to earth. this establishes a strong magnetic field in the coil. when the points open the flow of current is instantaneously cut off which causes the magnetic field to collapse and it's this collapse of the field that generates the HT produced in the coil tower and is fed down the HT "King" Lead to the Dizzy. There are two main important things which have to happen - and a number of small ones we can disregard too - but the two main ones are that, and most importantly, the magnetic field in the coil must have enough time to fully establish and then, secondly, this field must have time to collapse entirely before starting to rebuild for the next event. The number of degrees through which the distributor cam turns with the points CLOSED is the DWELL ANGLE and is what the Dwell Meter measure. If it's outside the quoted angle then the points need to be adjusted one way or the other to either increase or decrease the dwell angle. Too small a dwell is indicative of too large a static gap on the points and vice versa. It's a bit time consuming as it means, if the angle is outside the recommended limits, taking the dizzy cap off, adjusting the gap a smidgeon and replacing the cap then running the engine to recheck and, when you're inexperienced this can take quite a number of goes before you get it right. When you get good at it you can actually adjust dwell with the coil king lead earthed to the block and the engine turning over on the starter while you "fiddle" with the points locking screw and gap adjustment, Depends on how accessible the points and locking screw are. Some of the later cars back in the day, had an external adjuster on the distributor specifically so you could adjust dwell with the engine running.

One of the interesting things about dwell is that it gets to be a really important factor when you either try to operate a high reving or multicylinder engine because dwell is actually nothing to do with the angle the dizzy cam turns through, it's all about the time the field in the coil has to build and then, more importantly, collapse. So, for instance, The old V8s would sometimes have a distributor with two sets of points, and two coils one for each alternately firing 4 cylinders So it was really like two 4 cylinder setups. Also "performance" coils were available for competition engines which could collapse their magnetic fields more quickly than a normal jobbie. A 6 cylinder competition engine, maybe an XK Jag or similar, was generally considered to be about as much as a single points controlled system could reliably work with. The other problem often encountered was the "condenser" - actually a capacitor - which was there to protect the point from sparking as they opened by acting as a "sink" to which the reverse current surge from the collapsing coil field could be diverted. This is very important as it's the instant at which the points open, so cutting the current to the coil and initiating the HT to the King lead, which dictates the exact commencement of the HT which fires the relevant plug. Sparking at the points, apart from leading to early points failure through burning, also blurs the precise moment at which the spark occurs thus "blurs" the exact timing and destroys performance. Our boss insisted on plugs, points and condenser always being done at the vehicle's annual service and I can remember hearing some of our more mechanically minded customers having quite in depth conversations with him about whether the condenser really needed replace at every "major" service. It probably didn't to be honest, but, it was good "insurance", cost very little on the total cost of the service and, probably most importantly, ensured reliable vehicles for the vast majority of our customers.

If you've understood all that then well done - I'm now feeling a bit light headed myself! One of the dead giveaways on those old Vivas or anything else for that matter, was connecting the dwell meter up (which for us was part of the Sun Tuner work bench we used on every big service) and observing the dwell angle shown. If it held a pretty steady reading - they always jump about very slightly - then the Dizzy was usually good. If the dwell was jumping around, up and down, (we had the advantage you could put it up on the screen as a graph) then it was usually an indication that the shaft bushing were worn allowing the shaft to wobble which, of course, made an absolute nonsense of the coil recovery times and ignition spark settings. The "nasty" thing about this for the DIYer was that you could set the points as exactly as you liked and the engine still wouldn't run well. The problem was, of course, that with worn distributor bushings the shaft would have been pushed to one side while you were statically setting your points but then, on starting it up the shaft would "wobble" thus making a nonsense of all the time you'd spent trying to get the points gap set absolutely "spot on".

Right Mike, koalar and all you others. What did I get wrong? Be gentle with me please. :unsure: :ROFLMAO:

Edit. Although of course, you need the engine running to check the dwell and dynamic (strobe) timing, so may have to "fiddle" with a carburettor to get the thing running, you must get the dwell (points gap) and timing set up correctly before finally "fiddling" with carburation. Also of course points gap, whether you do it with just feelers for gapping or by dwell comes before timing comes before setting fuelling. So it's POINTS, (maybe using a dwell meter) then TIMING then FUELING (which will likely also involve idle speed adjustment as older fixed jet carbs need to be idling for the mixture screw to be effective. Stuff like SU and Stromberg we can have another whole conversation about if you like lads?
 
Last edited:
I know very little about dwell, so will start researching that now - thank you!

You are 100% right about wear on the distributor. It’s something I’m surprised isn’t discussed more - as it has a catastrophic effect on performance.
Quite apart from the problem of how it affects the field in the coil, a worn distributor shaft will allow the exact point at which the points start to open jump around and become erratic thus catastrophically altering the point on the piston's stroke at which the plug sparks and thus the timing. A worn base plate in the distributor can also cause this but is usually not so common.
I spent a week troubleshooting, finding lots of other problems (which were good to solve) – but the root cause of my issues were down to the distributor not reliably retarding. So no matter what I did with the car, it always appeared as if the mixture had changed or the timing was out as I could set it up to run, and then find after a short trip up the road it was all messed up again!

A refurbished distributor has transformed the car, so it’s now just down to final tweaks really. It’s just that I am a little uncomfortable at trying to solve for too many variables at once - idle, mixture, and timing. I’m really surprised at how hard it is to find a reliable idling number!

Regarding your comments about it being nice to see someone trying to make points and condenser work, thank you for the encouragement – that’s nice to read. I’m keen to prove to myself that I can make the car run as well as it did when it was produced 50 years ago. The beauty of the 500 for me is in its simplicity (and of course it’s iconic design), and I get a lot of satisfaction when I solve a problem! And I have lots of little problems to solve on this car :)
Very early on, back in the "swinging" 60's my future wife - we were already a serious item by then - worked in ground services at Heathrow and her best friend also worked there. She had a Fiat 500 like yours and the two of them travelled up the A30 in it to work every day. Her friend's husband was an upholsterer for BOAC (which is the airline they both worked for) so knew nothing about cars at all. Traveling just over 50 miles every day was really a bit much to expect of this poor wee car but it never stranded them. However I ended up repairing it nearly every weekend, unless I was myself working. I remember the drive shaft splines packing in on two sets of driveshafts but the engine never gave any problems apart from regular servicing. We've remained friends all these years and every year, around Easter, we and three other ex BOAC staff couples with whom we've remained friends all these years, meet up for a long weekend in a country pub, still recovering from this year's outing!
Edit: regarding fuel, I think super unleaded is the easiest choice to make – I’ve bought some lead additive to as I can’t tell whether they’ve fixed their head on it for unleaded or not. My latest discovery was that some fuel hose I bought from an automotive store just a couple of weeks ago has softened resulting in the introduction of a little bit of air – I was shocked, and of course the mixture went to the wall! I need to find out if there’s some sort of standard for fuel hose. I would rather get rid of black hose I’ve had to use temporarily and go back to transparent hose if I can, simply because I can see air bubbles easier and realise there’s a problem!
Quite apart from the lack of lead additive for valve seat protection and RON rating of modern fuels for anti knock, the big problem for us with older vehicles is that Ethanol attacks stuff like fuel lines, gasket seals, even rubber tipped float chamber needles and other stuff. So best to avoid not just because the "super" rated fuel (E5) will have less ethanol in it. It's a big problem with old horticultural machinery although, because they were experimenting with it earlier than us, some of the American engines - Briggs and Stratton, Tecumseh, etc can cope with it. Trouble is if you put a high ethanol fuel in one which can't tolerate it the effect is slow to become apparent so you don't notice a problem developing until it's too late and simply changing to E5 doesn't solve the problem because the damage is done by then. One good thing about air cooled engines is often, but not unfortunately always, the valves and seats are harder because air cooled motors tend to run much higher temperatures when pushed hard. So often an air cooled engine isn't so worried by valve seat recession compared to a water cooled jobbie. Trouble is it's engine specific and I don't know if the 500 is one of these or not. Anyone?
 
Last edited:
Re the hardened valve seats, I believe where aluminium cylinder heads the valves seats on some vehicles were hardened inserts already, so less troubles by unleaded fuels, however where cast iron heads on some engines the valves seats were machined directly in the head.
I may be wrong but when Shell first introduced their unleaded fuel the Police were running Vauxhall's possible Cavaliers with cast iron cylinder heads and they took Shell to Court over rapid valve/seat wear, any confirmation?
Good to talk about old style distributor's etc, for a change rather than stuff like VVT and Lambda issues, eh, Jock? Wrinkles still have some use.:)
 
Last edited:
Snell vs police issues were deposits building up on back of valve heads
What year was that? I had a customers three cylinder 2009 Corsa with inlet valves sticking open causing plastic inlet manifold to melt during motorway break down on nearly new car. Local Vauxhall Main Dealer Salesman offered them £500 part ex with blown engine at 24K miles from new, one lady driver, knowing he could get it done under a retrospective warranty claim as engines were roughly £2k at the time. He told them to get stu**ed and sold me his daughters car for £900 and bought a BMW Mini as his wife worked for BMW Dealership. I thought that would have been around 2001ish?
Somehow I thought the valve seat wear issue was earlier, maybe they started reducing lead.
I see on line Shell started to introduce "lead replacement " petrol in August 1999 so maybe the issue I was thinking about was around then.:)
 
Re the hardened valve seats, I believe where aluminium cylinder heads the valves seats on some vehicles were hardened inserts already, so less troubles by unleaded fuels, however where cast iron heads on some engines the valves seats were machined directly in the head.
I may be wrong but when Shell first introduced their unleaded fuel the Police were running Vauxhall's possible Cavaliers with cast iron cylinder heads and they took Shell to Court over rapid valve/seat wear, any confirmation?
Good to talk about old style distributor's etc, for a change rather than stuff like VVT and Lambda issues, eh, Jock? Wrinkles still have some use.:)
I remember when Shell introduced unleaded, maybe that was when? Noone knew it was going to cause massive seat recession on a whole raft of engines. As you say Mike, the problem was because the seats were machined directly into the head casting so if the vehicle was used for more than a quick trip to the shops the seat metal simply burned away. One good trip down the motorway would be enough to reduce compression to such an extent the vehicle then wouldn't restart. Big problem if all you'd done was stop off for a coffee at a service area! Mind you it made grinding the valves in pretty easy. I remember the first time I attempted to grind in exhaust valves on a head with "hard" seats. I could have done a whole head on something like a Mini or Cambridge in the time it took to do just one or two on that one! The Shell petrol scandal was a big thing at the time, trying to remember what the fuel was called but can't remember.
 
So if the Police were doing high mileage at motorway speeds they would soon have problems, hence the court case with iron head Cavaliars.:)
The old seat cutting tools were rubbish on later hardened valve seats, fortunately at yet another garage closing down auction I bought a set of Sykes Pickavant valve seat cutters with the nice milling teeth and the same for the valves themselves, to say it made a difference would be an understatement, after cutting the seats, a short grind and you had a perfect seal. I have used them on many engines, from lawn mower to 2.8 Sofim diesels.:)
 
Back
Top