Second Last Post

  • Thread starter Roger Ramjet
  • Start date
  • Replies 45
  • Views 872

Currently reading:
Second Last Post

R

Roger Ramjet

Guest
One day, there were thre unsuspecting individuals who went to buy a Bravo. Now, these three knew each other, but did not realise they were all going to view the same car, which was priced at £3000. When they got to the showroom and saw the gleaming beast, they were so overcome with joy after seeing it's 18inch rims, induction kit, huge back box, blacked out windows, flamed wheel arches and Carlos Fandango spoliers that they agreed to buy it together and pay a third, i.e. £1000 each.

The salesman then comes into the show room and says to the gullible individuals, "I tell you what I'll do, I'll knock £500 of the screen price. Out of that £500 reduction, I'll give you each back £100 from the £1000 you've paid and I'll keep £200 for my commission.

The three men were obviously delighted.

Here's the catch, they have now paid a total of £900 each (£1000 initailly, then handed back £100) totalling £2700 and the salesman kept £200 comission; adding upto £2900.

Where's the extra £100 gone?
 
It hasn't gone anywhere.

£500 off the screen price of £3000 leaves you with £2500.

£200 is added back as the salesperson is taking commission. Therefore all three are paying £2700 in total thus making their payment of £900 each correct and the total: £2700.

The fact you've added £200 as the commission onto the price they've paid is wrong, as that is included in the £2700 they've paid.

Consequently, the salesperson has only lost £300 as opposed to £500 and the 3 buyers are very silly people indeed.

Insy.
 
Re: Re: Second Last Post

No, you're wrong.

Each paid £900. £900x3=£2700.

£3000-£2700 = £300, seeing as salesman kept £200, that leaves £100 missing as he knoceked off £500, £100 back each (x3 as above) and £200 comission.

Try again.
 
Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

I agress with Insy that is correct, There are howevere different ways of working it out but all come to the same conclusion
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

No!

If they collectively paid £2700 - it leaves £300.

If the salesman kept £200, it still leaves £2900, thereby £100 short.

Think about it.

I'll post the correct answer tomorrow.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

Naaaaaaa.

Salesperson knocks £500 off the price is what you said.

He gets £200 commission and the three owners get £100 back - that is how the £500 drop is calculated.

In effect, the £500 drop is in fact £300.

For you to say it totals £2900 is the same as saying the salesperson pays £200 towards the car for the 3 owners which would be non-sensical.

If they've all paid £1000 each and got £100 back that means they've totalled £2700. They've not paid anymore than £900 in effect, so how you get to £2900 is beyond me :)
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

The salesperson obviously works for Fiat, and is simply ripping you off!...its probably for admin charges...lol

Daz
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

I'll say again;

3 x £900 = £2700 + £200 commission = £2900.

Daz is right, the salesman in fact kept £300, not £200. Add it up again.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

No Insy is right.

They are paying £2700 which is the £2500 for the car, and £200 for the salesman's cut, the other £300 which would have made it £3000 is given back to them at £100 each.

The £2700 they paid is including the £200 cut for the salesman, not excluding.

Barakka
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

i think its gone up the dealers sleeve. ;)
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

no, he's not.

read it again.
 
.

there is no missing money

Each of the people have £100 = £300
Dealer has £200 = £500
Car is £2500 = £3000

Done
 
come on ramjet tell us the what the answer is then please it is driving me mad
 
Re: .

I know there's no missing money!

3 X £900 = £2700

£3000 - £2700 = dealer kept £300 not £200!

It was just a little poser for you.

What's teh score with the 16V Tipo - I used to have one of those and hugely impressed with it I was too.
 
Re: Re: .

The money paid was 3 X 900 pounds!

Thats £2700!

How can the dealer take an extra £300 that doesn't exist, if the dealer took £300 then the garage would end up with £2400 for the car, not £2500!
 
Re: Re: Re: .

£3000 minus £2700 = £300. Doh!

I'm not explaining it again - if you don't understand, read the original question.
 
Re: Re: Second Last Post

i remember this but when i heard it it was to do with buying hats or something. I can't remember the answer but it was to do with you doing two different sums. your sums aren't correct.

£3000 for car - £500 discount = price of car £2500.

The 3 of them pay £1000 = £3000

the dealer gives them £100 back meaning they have paid £900 totaling £2700.

£2700 paid - £2500 price of the car = £200 left over - The salesmen commission.
 
Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

Totally agree with ya there. £1000 - £100 x3 = £2700. The salesperson doesn't pay £200 towards the car to make it £2900!

For us all to think the same, perhaps the question is inaccurately posed if the 'correct' answer is different? Just a thought :)

Insy.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Second Last Post

You have got to kidding no wonder i could not work it out.come on ramjet dont tell me this is true
 

Similar threads

C
Replies
0
Views
6K
ChrisKnottIns
C
C
Replies
2
Views
659
Craig Parker
C
T
Replies
0
Views
449
Tucker Andrew
T
O
Replies
18
Views
813
Carroll
C
L
Replies
0
Views
445
L
Back
Top