- Joined
- Apr 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,102
- Points
- 358
Yeah fair enough. Crazy differences in hot weather with tires.
Or cold for that matter. My Conti 2's really feel hard and slippery below about 3-4 degrees..
Yeah fair enough. Crazy differences in hot weather with tires.
Or cold for that matter. My Conti 2's really feel hard and slippery below about 3-4 degrees..
It seems like some people are tyre experts on paper (Caravadossi, I'm looking at you!) and seem to ignore the experiences of others purely based on specs that were tested in a lab, rather than by a person on real British roads in the actual car that most of us drive. I'm not saying that specs and ratings are not something that you should consider, but they're not the be all and end all, they were merely put in place to get some of the quite frankly ridiculously rubbish eastern European and Chinese **** off our roads (or at least highlight how utterly crap it is). if it weren't for the wrong speed rating, I'd happily get some T1-R's because of Jnoile's opinion of them, the opinion of a competent person means more than stuff tested in a lab.....
Lol, anyway back to tyres...I think I'm going to go for the Dunlop Sport BlueResponse. It gets great reviews and succeeds the FastReponse.
Some say its a performance tyre some call it a touring tyre.
Either way it seems to have good wet and dry braking and lap performance.
It seems like some people get themselves all Man United & lathered-up into a tyre rage that seriously clouds their judgement.
The first point you’ve got wrong is that I’m an expert “on paper” or otherwise. I do read the research papers of qualified international experts - & note their findings. Perhaps you can avoid or evade that step in non-manufacturing – but we have Q standards to meet & consider issues like product liability & lot traceability. The second point you’ve got wrong is that the experiences of others are rejected “purely based on specs that were tested in a lab.” It’s far more likely their views are rejected on the grounds their comments amount to a subjective blow-off with little or no supporting evidence or proven experience. Proof, brings us to your third error – lab tests! The testing methodology for wet grip & external noise tests are outdoor tests – not lab tests. Name the testing authorities that are flooding their lab for the wet grip tests & testing external tyre noise indoors. (Here’s looking at you).
Finally, your finest hour – the notion that there’s someone in the UK who claims to know better than the tyre manufacturer, EU & JATMA authorities. By buying this tyre & fitting them to their FIAT & driving it – miraculously pushes-the-envelope of it’s performance into a medal winner, & the reviewer feted as … <competent>. (It couldn’t possibly be the what-a-clever-buy-they’ve-made effect?).
Somehow I can’t see Toyo closing their proving ground with mass redundancies of testing personnel on the grounds their competence is challenged by some amateur of dubious qualifications & experience. Best get a wiggle-on if your heart’s set on the T1-R. Toyo have moved forward so why would they continue with a tyre from the 20thC with those labels? Unless of course they have plans to redevelop it.
031210Z
I like Uniroyal Rainsports -- suited my Cinq Turbo and 1.2 Cinq fine, might try them on the T5 when it needs new front covers (sooner, rather than later.........).![]()
At the price of them it would be worthwhile having a stock pile of the T1Rs while you can still get them.Be sure to ask Caravadossi if they're good.![]()
The OHs MiTo has another buldge on the front passenger tyre.that's 2 tyres gone in 215/45 R17. Didn't happen with the P0s but the Uniroyals are better in the wet. Wouldn't be getting the Uniroyals again. Given the state of the roads the only tyres that will suit are stiffer walled ones. They had been pumped to the max pressure permissible.
In my experience Falken's are not the best. But hell, let Caravadossi see what the labels say and we'll know what they're really likeFalkens seem to have stiffer sidewalls than most, but might be unduly harsh on overweight cars with poorly developed suspensions.
A good whap from a pothole will ruin any tyre, possibly take the wheel out too!
yo, Caravadossi.
Riddle me this riddle me that, why do Yoko AD08's get an A rating http://camskill.co.uk/m12b0s662p59628/Yokohama_Tyres_Car_Yokohama_AD08_Advan_Neova_Yokohama_AD_08_-_195_50_R15_82V_TL_Fuel_Eff_%3A_F_Wet_Grip%3A_A_NoiseClass%3A_3_Noise%3A_75dB in the wet when they're universally regarded as being a tyre which is not the best in the wet? :chin:
But hey, what would people who actually have them on their cars know about them that some people who have done a few lab tests wouldn't :chin:
ExactlyIsn't the problem with AD08 Aquaplaning not a prob with outright braking / cornering in the wet? Just goes to show that the ratings aren't all encompassing.
Lol, anyway back to tyres...I think I'm going to go for the Dunlop Sport BlueResponse. It gets great reviews and succeeds the FastReponse.
Some say its a performance tyre some call it a touring tyre.
Either way it seems to have good wet and dry braking and lap performance.
Falkens seem to have stiffer sidewalls than most, but might be unduly harsh on overweight cars with poorly developed suspensions.
A good whap from a pothole will ruin any tyre, possibly take the wheel out too!