What's wrong with Firefox? It's free, has tabbed browsing and is a much more mainstream option than Opera.
dave said:both them bits is new see if you can get the one before and it dont have them![]()
softwarez said:carlos1981 what do you mean the App department wonr help unless I.E? what work do they do? and i can answer it.
Heres something you all didnt know..
FireFox..Opera etcetc.. NSBrowsers are unhealthy.
People have more advantage of getting your eprsonal information rather than from I.E.. i could explain.. but it goes into detail.. but to put into normal terms.. I.E prevents most intruders. whereas opera people can easily obtain most information form your comp (it's how tis all linked into eachother through the numerous dll's.. it reads them.. and they finally lnik up to your Data.. Very unsafe, but most normal users cant see this![]()
yeah that what lots of top computer boffs sayHelz said:Yand the fact that you're not using IE means there are fewer trackers etc. trying to get in in the first place.
ie 1.0 that was before i was born, you must be about a million years oldhmallett said:This gave me the chance to use Internet Explorer 1.0 - Total rubbish!
H
Helz said:Yes they do use the various files, which is what makes them so customisable because you can amend what you need to and Opera picks up on it eg. search files. But a lot of the loopholes have been closed, very few people bother exploiting a vuln that affects very few people and the data you can gain is limited - one or two pieces of a jigsaw is not enough to put the whiole thing together. That is if they can get in in the first place if you're not firewalled/ routered up. And use of your cookie manager and the fact that you're not using IE means there are fewer trackers etc. trying to get in in the first place.
Nice of you to present a balanced view.
H didntsoftwarez said:any expert will tell you, stay with I.E.