distortionrockets said:
well im only speaking from my own experiences and this is what ive found so far:-
car starts as normal
better acceleration
higher top speed
great sound
easier to keep engine bay clean
no problems in cold
no engine wear YET
only downside so far is the buying cost and by the summer mine will need cleaning.
il obviously keep you posted when/if engine parts do wear out!
k&n panel filter is obviously the sensible option. just a shame im not sensible
Hmm, better acceleration just from fitting a K&N? I must admit that when mine is fitted, it
sounds as if it accelerates better, but without testing with accurate timing lights both with the K&N and without it, it can be hard to tell just how much (if any) extra power/ acceleration has been gained.
I used to read many of the older car tuning magazines (Street Machine, Custom Car, Car & Car Conversions etc.), and it was often interesting to read the articles when they did a group test of the same car. They would get a whole load of the same car together, ranging from bog standard to highly modified. Then they would test them for performance and power.
It was very interesting to see that some of the cars with a whole host of performance goodies, and which the owners swore had made the car much quicker than standard, were actually LESS POWERFUL than the standard car when tested on the dyno and against the timing lights! However, because the free flow exhausts/ manifolds/ air filters/ wild camshafts/ big valve heads etc. etc. made a raucous noise when going for it, the owner was convinced it was producing big power...
The above mentioned magazines also used to test things like air filters and exhausts from different manufactures, and they would use the same standard car for each test to get an accurate comparison. Suffice to say, most airfilters made very little (if any) difference on their own, but when fitted in conjunction with a gas flowed head, different camshaft, tubular exhaust manifold/ less restrictive back box AND set up properly on a rolling road (attention paid to ignition settings, dwell angles, fuel ratios etc.) only THEN was extra power was released.
So armed with this knowledge, you'll have to forgive me for being cynical about alledged power claims! Until I see the before and after 1/4 mile timing slips from Santa Pod, and the before and after prints from the dynometer I will assume that any engine modification(s) have made bugger all difference
The problem with the FIRE engine is that the 999cc head, and especially the camshaft, is restrictive. Unless the head can flow more air, the free'est flowing air filter in the world won't make much difference other than making the air/ fuel mixture weak. And of course, then you have to take into account how good the exhaust system is - how well does the exhaust manifold 'extract' gases, how much does the back box restrict air flow? etc.
Engine tuning for power is far, far more than just changing one part. EVERYTHING has to be taken into consideration, and all modifications have to compliment each other. A big valve head and a too large bore 'free flow' exhaust will actually conflict with each other for instance. Every modification has to be carefully tested and thought out, and really unless a before and after test is done on a dynometer it's impossible to say whether power has increased or not.
Anyway, I digress! Back to a couple of points on the K&N.
Cold running problems are more likely to occur on carburetor models (of which I have), rather than SPI fuel injection. I ran my K&N up until November, when it got cold and I started getting all the classic icing symptoms, so I swapped it back for the original airbox. I've been meaning to put the K&N back on now that the weather has warmed up, but have been so busy I haven't got round to it. Plus it needs a clean first
Engine wear should NOT be a problem with a K&N, as long as it is cleaned and oiled as specified. Only if it is allowed to dry out will it be a problem as then microscopic particles will get through the filtration and into the engine.
Ironically, though a lot of people don't like the look of the standard air filter, its overall design is way, way better than any stand alone performace airfilter! That's why the replacement panel K&N would give the owner the best of both worlds, but then again the engine bay wouldn't look as cool
Other than that, well, I think every thing else has been covered! I'll report back when I finally get my K&N fitted again and say whether it really does seem to make the engine more powerful or not. I didn't notice it last year, so I might try and swap the air filters back and forth a few times and really try and see if there is a difference.
Chas