Uno Fiat Uno Brakes failed

Currently reading:
Uno Fiat Uno Brakes failed

jijibuggi

New member
Joined
Aug 18, 2013
Messages
33
Points
14
Location
N/A
the other night my parents used my uno for some errands. Apparently the brakes failed in traffic on a hill and luckily they managed to stop the car from crashing by using the handbrake. Apparently when the brake was pressed, the pedal just sank to the ground and didn't work at all. After that i checked for any leaks from the master cylinder or from any pipes around the underside / engine bay of the car. There does not seem to be any leak. I drove the car afterwards and everything was ok. Ever since ive been driving it, it has always worked well. Also i have never had this problem with any of my previous uno's. However i noticed that the hydraulic fluid of the car (in the reservoir) is brown. Could this be the problem? - Bad hydraulic fluid?

At this point any advice / suggestions would be greatly appreciated

Regards,


Jeremy
 
The Master Cylinder can be worn out.
It will not leak if that is so.The break fluid will just slip between the cylinder inside.
Break fluid must be replaced every two years.
I guess it´s more than just air in the system.
Be careful !
Jo
 
yes, the brown / dirty fluid points to a system that has not been well maintained,

had the car been in regular use when they borrowed it..??,
just wondering why it happened on that 1 occasion..,

anyway try this 1 little tip /test,
get in the car = engine off,
press on the brake pedal quite hard , then pump it a couple of times,
then press REALLY hard,
try and LOCK your foot on the pedal in a position where you are comfortable and can keep the pedal from retracting,
then turn the ignition key to START the engine,
Question = do you feel the pedal SINK at this point ??,

Charlie
 
Thanks for the replies...

Yes, the car is used on a daily basis. However i only noticed the brown hydraulic fluid yesterday evening as i haven't had the car for more than 2 months. I'm trying to see how i'm going to find out if the problem is coming from the master cylinder or not. If so, i was told that i should replace this with a new one rather than a second hand one. Shame, as i have one from my old uno lying around in the garage. Charlie, i will soon try your little test and let you know how it goes.

Jeremy
 
Second hand brake hydraulics are usually a bad idea. Your life may depend on it.

Your car has dual circuit brakes. If a leak develops in one circuit, the other should still operate, giving adequate braking, but with more pedal travel and a longer time to stop. To lose both circuits at once can only be a master cylinder or servo fault, probably the master cylinder, but try Charlie's test and report back first.
 
I had exactly the same problem with my Uno, when my brakes went I would of rear ended a 4x4 if it wasn't for the handbrake :eek:

It was fine for a while again after, then it'd do it again without warning!!

As suggested the culprit was a faulty brake master cylinder ;) I did find out there's a few types on the Uno so make sure you get the right one.
 
Yes I had this happen to me back in the day. The brakes would be nice and progressive as you slowed then suddenly, nothing, no resistance other than the spring. They changed the master cylinder and it was all fine. I was in an antiskid model at the time though so not sure if the underlying system is exactly the same.
 
MANY POINTS IN HERE,:eek::shrug:

Yes many people seem to forget to change the brake fluid. The boiling point, moisture content changes over time affecting its performance and can cause failure, alone, just form the fluid.

Also if the *wrong* brake fluid has been added at some time, the rubber seals can be incompatible and break down. Rubber seals are matched with brake fluid (s).If the wrong sort of fluid is used,the seals can 'blow up' and expand. This can cause a sticking brake pedal with brakes stuck on, or vice versa (no brakes). Amazingly very few people, (apart from Citroen owners (whom have always had different fluids)), are even aware of this.

I have experienced this directly on two cars. Firstly my 1963 2CV van:-When I bought it, the previous owner had (stupidly) put the modern Citroen LHM brakefluid, in it. However when this car was made, Citroen was using the "old fashioned" brake fluid (that nearly everyone else uses today!), and not the LHM brake fluid.

Result was the seals expanded in the master cylinder and wedged it solid. Once the brakes were applied they would not did release. Master cylinder failure.

Second example of the worng sort of fluid causing brake failure, (power steering fluid)was put in a 1999 Ford Fiesta braking circuit. The result was a master cylinder failure, as it could not force the fluid through to the brakes. Weak brake and brake pedal to the floor were symptoms.


Proper servicing and changing of brake fluid is important. I had a 1982 Citroen Visa 652cc. In London, on old brake fluid, the brakes used to overheat, with all the start/stop at traffic lights, the brakes got too hot. The brake pedal used to go to the floor leaving "no brakes". The old fluid vapourised, creating compressible gas in the system.

I think partly the Citroen Visa has brakes which are not up to the job, as they overheated in the Alps once on me too.

"However" with new fresh proper brake fluid.....the problem diminished. You may not think new brake fluid alone can make a difference, but it sometimes can. Make sure you totally flush out the old fluid though, and any rubbish in it.

*Routine* servicing and changing fluid really can make a difference.

One other point. Someone mentioned that to lose both brake circuits at once can only be master cylinder failure. NOT SO:-....... (I speak from experience)

Most cars have a divided master cylinder reservoir, with a 'dam' halfway up between the two parts. The theory is that should a leak develop in one part of the section, the fluid drains away in *that* isolated section; *but* leaving the other side "intact". The theory is the fluid drops down to the 'dam wall' height between the sections, as it isolates them creating two 'independent' circuits.

HOWEVER, what happens in reality if there is a fault/leakage, is the leaking half drains away; then...

As the car is on the move the bumps/cornering/g forces slosh the brake fluid from the full side across to the faulty side; and that brake fluid then drains away through the faulty side of the circuit......

So you still can get *total* brake failure on Dual circuit system, even with a properly functioning mastercylinder. (the term dual circuit is misapplied with respect to safety). All the dual brake circuits (that I have seen) do is to actually delay the time that you get brake failure, and give you more of a buffer zone.. I have never seen a dual circuit braking system, where there are two totally *independent* braking circuits. Say a pipe breaks at the back wheel of a car. The fluid drains away (by gravity and brake application) from that part of the circuit, and that circuit eventually drains away.

As the car is bumping about and with g forces on it, the fluid from the 'good' circuit can slosh over into the breached circuit. The 'good' circuit tops up the leaking circuit, and then that runs out too.

Another point:-

Seizing pistons in the brake calliper can result in binding brakes (to varying degrees) and overheating, then brake fluid boiling and no brakes. I have not owned Fiats long enough to have experienced this. But I have experienced it on Ford Fiestas multiple times; when the cars get to around 12 years old. Ford braking systems are not my favourite (However any 'real' Citroen owner thinks that all brakes on all other cars are substandard and weak).

On Fords the piston in the calliper can rust and seize. Taking it out, copper slipping it and rotating it can keep it going for another 6 months to a year or so without sticking. But you will need a *new* calliper if it is that. So it maybe that too. The sticking calliper causes the brakes to overheat/vapourise, then eventually pedal to the floor with no braking effort at wheels.

Symptoms:-
If it is the sticky calliper the car may go "bang" when pulling off from a roundabout for instance; as they locked on calliper suddenly lets go. It is most pronounced in stop/start city traffic.

I hope all of that makes sense.:bang:
 
MANY POINTS IN HERE,:eek::shrug:

Also if the *wrong* brake fluid has been added at some time, the rubber seals can be incompatible and break down. Rubber seals are matched with brake fluid (s).If the wrong sort of fluid is used,the seals can 'blow up' and expand.

On Fords the piston in the calliper can rust and seize. Taking it out, copper slipping it and rotating it can keep it going for another 6 months to a year or so without sticking. But you will need a *new* calliper if it is that. So it maybe that too. The sticking calliper causes the brakes to overheat/vapourise, then eventually pedal to the floor with no braking effort at wheels.

Most of the points you made are valid, but after advising not to mix different types of brake fluid, you are now advocating putting copper grease next to brake seals. That is likely to develop the same seal swell problem. Proper brake grease should be used, that is compatible with the seals.
The problem lies with the incompatibility of mineral and vegetable fluids. Brake fluid is vegetable-based, most other lubricants are mineral-based. Years ago, lots of young lads used to use Castrol R in their two-stroke mopeds. As this is a vegetable-based oil it would often result in blockage of the oil feeds when it reacted with the residue of the mineral-based oil used previously. Problems can also occur using vegetable oil in diesel engines if the right chemicals are not added to stop them fighting. Even then, it requires more regular oil changes, often negating the fuel cost saving.

One other point. Someone mentioned that to lose both brake circuits at once can only be master cylinder failure. NOT SO:-....... (I speak from experience)

Most cars have a divided master cylinder reservoir, with a 'dam' halfway up between the two parts. The theory is that should a leak develop in one part of the section, the fluid drains away in *that* isolated section; *but* leaving the other side "intact". The theory is the fluid drops down to the 'dam wall' height between the sections, as it isolates them creating two 'independent' circuits.

HOWEVER, what happens in reality if there is a fault/leakage, is the leaking half drains away; then...

As the car is on the move the bumps/cornering/g forces slosh the brake fluid from the full side across to the faulty side; and that brake fluid then drains away through the faulty side of the circuit......

The driver is at fault here. When one circuit fails, the pedal travel increases. This should be noticed by the driver a long time before your "splash" loses the other circuit. Lifting the bonnet and looking can help too.

Many cars these days with hydraulic clutches use the one reservoir. The clutch feed is higher in the reservoir, so loss of fluid will lose the clutch first. Everyone wins. The manufacturer saves the cost of two reservoirs, the driver gets a very early warning.
 
Last edited:
All of my points are valid.

Yes copper on the (brake) piston shaft for "corroded" pistons. Ford Fiesta ones are terrible for corroded disc pistons, from my experience; and it is the copper that appears to be needed to keep them freed up for any period of time.On corroded pistons other non copper-greases don't seem to work for any period of sustained time.

My mum has had all Ford Fiestas from Mark 1- Mark 4, and this was a common theme on the later ones. My 'fleet' of cars range from 41 years old, to 14 years old currently, which is considerably older than the average age of cars that most people have. My Fiat is in the middle at 23 years old. Some of the cars have driven UK to Asia and back from New Zealand . So I have to report on what actually does work, from my experience.

If you do not like the idea of Cu grease on them, you have to realise the cars already have a seized calliper,with a piston roughened with corrosion. So all of the braking components are "worn" and past their best. I also obviously suspect any seals as being "weepy" having been on cars with seized callipers. The heat build can be intense and has to be monitored.

Any driver should notice any change of "brakes", but as you admit, so called Dual Brake circuits are not completely independent circuits, and are to a degree a safety misnomer. You can not call a failing brake circuit "driver error" mr Portland-Bill.. Every car has a big red light that comes on to warn of low brake fluid, so any driver would notice besides.So please do not make wrong assumptions Portland_Bill. Be sensible.

Having driven cars that have suffered "ripped" rear brake lines, one truly wishes that dual braking circuits were truly proper independent dual circuits.

Hydraulic clutch's are yet another separate complication. Again the failing clutch seals on a 1999 Ford Fiesta (in 2011) still consumed the brake fluid reservoir (even when the rest of the braking circuit as fine) with sloshing about.

I therefore prefer cars with clutch cables. The clutch cable on my 1972 Citroen DS snapped just over a year ago, just before the cars 40th birthday. It was the original factory clutch cable. Yet the hydraulic mechanism on the clutch on my mums car failed when it was 11 years old and at a much lower mileage of only around 52,000

Of course it is possible to drive manual cars without using the clutch at all. Good to know and practice so you can continue your drive should it happen. If you balance the revs to the road speed, & the gears just slide in at the correct moment. When you get it right you will have no grating going up or down through the gears. For those that don't know how you deal with complete stops and pulling off, have a think! Hopefully your starter motor is in good order to pull off in first gear ;-) . This was all gained from my normal car use. But as a side note when I was driving in New Zealand on a class 4 licence (heavy vehicles), you have to do the driving test there on a NON syncromesh gearbox to get the unrestricted licence. All my classic car driving days with clutchless gearchanging was a distinct advantage.

Even now I nearly always drive double de-clutching on any vehicle (except motorbikes). Even on the new family Seat Ibiza I am constantly using.

Back to hydraulic brake failure again, the Citroen method of putting the handbrake on the front wheels provides a better mechanical bite for more braking traction , although not so good for handbrake turns!

With a failing brake circuit on my 1972 Triumph PI (big heavy car), the use of the handbrake on the rear wheels seemed to do 'nothing' retardation wise , or lock the rear wheels. There seemed to be no in between. Only then do you truly realise the advantage of handbrakes operating on the front wheels, should you have foot brake failure.
 
You can not call a failing brake circuit "driver error" mr Portland-Bill.. Every car has a big red light that comes on to warn of low brake fluid, so any driver would notice besides.So please do not make wrong assumptions Portland_Bill. Be sensible.

At no point have I said that a failing circuit is driver error. If you wish to state a different viewpoint, do so, but do not misquote.
 
Back
Top