mog1571 said:
aluminium has the same strength as the steel but weighs alot less.
Nope. Young's Modulus -the measure of tensile strength (E),Carbon Steel ~= 200GNm-2, Aluminium ~=70GNm-2.
Thats less than half! This is only of interest as Id think the manifold-cat joint is under a time varying tensile-compressive force, and thats the part most likely to fail in this loading. The manifold would probably be quite likely to fail under creep though, due to the high temperatures, temp cycling and loading involved.
mog1571 said:
u might need a slightly thicker guage though but i aint sure.
Yeah. to achieve the same load using the idea Force = Load / Area, the Aluminium would need about twice the area of the steel to withstand the same purely tensile load.
mog1571 said:
the main difference between aluminium and steel is that aluminium has a MUCH lower melting point about 250 degrees IIRC
Yeah 250 deg C sounds about right. Aluminium's MP is about 1083 deg C, and the steel's will be dependant on the composition of the alloy, as for the likelyhood of shear failure, I dunno, but IIRC, Aluminium usually has less cycles to fatigue failure than a steel under the same loading.
Other thing to bear in mind from all this, is that these ideas are purely theory and may only partially reflect reality - the actual scenario will have a mixture of loading / strain effects, but only one will be predominant (it will be the critical case - and cause failure before any other mechanism does)
. Long and unintentionally bitchy I know..Sorry!