Not sure if VW are a good example as their latest release are midly facelifted previous models. The mk6 Golf they openly claimed was a cost reduced version of the mk5.
Fiat have let things slip a bit in europe, I think especially where Alfa is concerned, due to the focus on the US. Having said that it sounds like there is a bumper year going on over there with the Chrysler products.
Concerning the current Panda, remember plenty of parts for suspension and brakes have been in production for far longer than the current shape and perform perfectly well. There is only so much they can do with a 3.6m long box which strut front suspension and trailing arm rear. So why waste money on redeveloping the wheel? focus on NVH, interior finish and eco benefits.
The next structural change is more likely to be due to crash regs than styling.
Interestingly and I am not sure if it is marketing (i havent had chance to find someone who swapped from Fiat Auto in the office at the moment) is that the 500US platform is referenced. Now this is more than likely trying to differentiate it from the existing panda but there are some changes to consider: its 1.4multiair ready, there seems to have been changes to the front suspension, the rear beam will have the ARB welded in and it may get the larger fuel tank. Also there might be some structural changes to help with safety. Not just the box ticking NCAP type of things)
I will be very interested to see it in the skin and also to see how the twinair translates into the panda. When I went in a 500TA it was very good and characterful and seemed to suit the car.
Unfortunately the price point will be more important than the innovation. This where fiat have been clever and developed the engines as they can be spread over more platforms.
Fiat have let things slip a bit in europe, I think especially where Alfa is concerned, due to the focus on the US. Having said that it sounds like there is a bumper year going on over there with the Chrysler products.
Concerning the current Panda, remember plenty of parts for suspension and brakes have been in production for far longer than the current shape and perform perfectly well. There is only so much they can do with a 3.6m long box which strut front suspension and trailing arm rear. So why waste money on redeveloping the wheel? focus on NVH, interior finish and eco benefits.
The next structural change is more likely to be due to crash regs than styling.
Interestingly and I am not sure if it is marketing (i havent had chance to find someone who swapped from Fiat Auto in the office at the moment) is that the 500US platform is referenced. Now this is more than likely trying to differentiate it from the existing panda but there are some changes to consider: its 1.4multiair ready, there seems to have been changes to the front suspension, the rear beam will have the ARB welded in and it may get the larger fuel tank. Also there might be some structural changes to help with safety. Not just the box ticking NCAP type of things)
I will be very interested to see it in the skin and also to see how the twinair translates into the panda. When I went in a 500TA it was very good and characterful and seemed to suit the car.
Unfortunately the price point will be more important than the innovation. This where fiat have been clever and developed the engines as they can be spread over more platforms.