Off Topic What's Your Best MPG?

Currently reading:
Off Topic What's Your Best MPG?

Dootson

New member
Joined
Jul 9, 2011
Messages
40
Points
10
Location
Manchester
Just a quick question really, I've searched and I could not find anything along these lines but:

What's your best MPG for your Panda's?

Mines: 33.6MPG but my average is a little higher
 
1.2, 1000 miles on the clock:
Worst: 42mpg, lots of short journeys
Best: 48mpg, 300 mile round trip, cruising at 70 on the motorway but giving it some welly on the A roads. I'm happy with that. :)
 
Just a quick question really, I've searched and I could not find anything along these lines but:

What's your best MPG for your Panda's?

Mines: 33.6MPG but my average is a little higher

Sorry, but you can not have an average a little higher than your best! Do you mean worst because that seems a bit low.

My best is about 45 but I can`t go above 40mph and all my driving is city equivilent. Mt ave is about 41 which I`m happy with.
 
Sorry, but you can not have an average a little higher than your best! Do you mean worst because that seems a bit low.

:yeahthat: how can your best be less than your average :confused: it can't ;) lol

My best in a mk3 is 55.1mpg at 3800 miles on the clock (trip indicated 57.3mpg) and the best in a mk2 was 62mpg :D both models are automatics (y)
 
Im just going off what my fuelly tells me, http://www.fuelly.com/driver/dootson/panda

Your account needs deleting and restarting, your logs haven't been done correctly and this has messed your figures up, you had one fill up with 27.86L and only travelled 16 miles for example.

Do you write the mileage covered on the trip in or use your ODO :confused:

I'd use your ODO as its easier and no remembering to reset trips (y)

Your account should look like this for example http://www.fuelly.com/driver/mep/stilo-2 or http://www.fuelly.com/driver/mep/panda-3

EDIT: I've checked your account in detail and your using the ODO that is good, but you don't appear to be filling your tank, you can't use fuelly and only fill up with £10 every now and then, you need to brim the tank at every fill up :)
 
Last edited:
EDIT: I've checked your account in detail and your using the ODO that is good, but you don't appear to be filling your tank, you can't use fuelly and only fill up with £10 every now and then, you need to brim the tank at every fill up :)


Always the way, ive just gone through and deleted all but my latest one haha. i know your meant to use it like that and i did but then i was not always able to fill up the tank in one go so it kind of defeated the point but i kept using it because i know know that i can fill my tank to the brim every time now
 
I always calculate mpg by filling the tank to the brim and recording both the mileage and the amount of fuel put in. On my 1.2 Dynamic Eco the computer always gives a higher mpg figure than is actually achieved. The best I have got is 62.8 mpg. Just before this I had done a long run when I was pushing the car harder than usual and only achieved 48.8.

The longest complete stretch for which I have recorded petrol usage was the first 11000 miles during which the car averaged 48.8 mpg, but since then I have recorded averages of 52 to 53 mpg over shorter periods.

I have noticed that fuel consumption drops in cold weather and also if you use 5th gear much. The engine seems to be at its most economical in the 3000 to 4000 rev range.

I had the use of a courtesy car for a few days (a 100hp Panda that had done 3000 miles). I drove it steadily for the first 200 miles and only averaged about 32 mpg. When I realized that the six-speed box was a hindrance and used either the bottom three gears only or the top three gears only, depending road/traffic conditions I got the consumption up to about 45mpg.
 
I always calculate mpg by filling the tank to the brim and recording both the mileage and the amount of fuel put in. On my 1.2 Dynamic Eco the computer always gives a higher mpg figure than is actually achieved. The best I have got is 62.8 mpg. Just before this I had done a long run when I was pushing the car harder than usual and only achieved 48.8.

The longest complete stretch for which I have recorded petrol usage was the first 11000 miles during which the car averaged 48.8 mpg, but since then I have recorded averages of 52 to 53 mpg over shorter periods.

I have noticed that fuel consumption drops in cold weather and also if you use 5th gear much. The engine seems to be at its most economical in the 3000 to 4000 rev range.

I had the use of a courtesy car for a few days (a 100hp Panda that had done 3000 miles). I drove it steadily for the first 200 miles and only averaged about 32 mpg. When I realized that the six-speed box was a hindrance and used either the bottom three gears only or the top three gears only, depending road/traffic conditions I got the consumption up to about 45mpg.

Your experience with the 1.2 fits in with what Mrs b_u has experienced, but I can't imagine how you got only 32mpg from a 100HP, especially driving "steadily". I don't thrash mine as a rule but I occasionally wring its neck and I've never got below 35mpg, even cruising on autoroutes/autostrade at 85-90 all day, or squirting it round the Devon lanes at 5000-7000 rpm whenever possible/safe. Don't understand your comments on the gearbox - the six speeds are probably not essential, given the engine's relatively broad spread of power/torque, but they are part of the car's character and generally mean you can choose one of three gears depending on road conditions and the driving mood you're in, but the dual three-speed box idea sounds really odd.
 
The car was not mine so on a 600 mile round trip, for the first 200 miles I kept between 60 and 65 for the bulk of the journey on dual carriageway, less on that on byroads. It soon became apparent that the engine was torquey and flexible. The middle part of the trip consisted mostly of journey to and fro around a town bypass that had several sets of traffic lights and roundabouts in quick succession. I was surprised to have an old granny out-drag me at the traffic lights in a Punto while I was stirring the pudding with the gear lever. I could have kept up, by wringing the car’s neck sometimes, but I don’t like aggressive gear changes, especially as the car wasn’t mine. In my opinion the car was undergeared, so I tended to skip gears and use the engines flexibility instead – which worked.

I’m not impressed with the fuel consumption of a number of the modern cars – my 1978 1600 Ford with a Cosworth engine returned 45mpg when I was really pushing it (never overtaken) on a long run, although this would drop below 25 if I drove it in a town. It was a very different beast to the 100 hp Panda, much more fun to drive.
 
The car was not mine so on a 600 mile round trip, for the first 200 miles I kept between 60 and 65 for the bulk of the journey on dual carriageway, less on that on byroads. It soon became apparent that the engine was torquey and flexible. The middle part of the trip consisted mostly of journey to and fro around a town bypass that had several sets of traffic lights and roundabouts in quick succession. I was surprised to have an old granny out-drag me at the traffic lights in a Punto while I was stirring the pudding with the gear lever. I could have kept up, by wringing the car’s neck sometimes, but I don’t like aggressive gear changes, especially as the car wasn’t mine. In my opinion the car was undergeared, so I tended to skip gears and use the engines flexibility instead – which worked.

I’m not impressed with the fuel consumption of a number of the modern cars – my 1978 1600 Ford with a Cosworth engine returned 45mpg when I was really pushing it (never overtaken) on a long run, although this would drop below 25 if I drove it in a town. It was a very different beast to the 100 hp Panda, much more fun to drive.

Either there was something wrong with the engine or you'd left the handbrake on - driving as you describe for the first 200 miles, bumbling along at 3000 revs in sixth I'd expect to get into the low 40s mpg (though I've never tried it). The way you describe having to drive to keep up with a Punto seems very strange, unless it was one of the quicker Puntos (Punti?) - sounds as though the gearchange is wonky as well.
 
Mrs. Beard used to run a 1.4 Stilo which has essentially the same engine and box as the 100HP and used to achieve high 30s on 30mph short commute and low 40s on a run. Her current Alfa 2.0 Veloce will do 30 on the short commute and 35mpg on a run.

As for my own Panda MJ, over nearly 7 years and 70,000 miles it's averaged mid 50s with a best single brim to brim of 62mpg which was on a series of cross country runs on mostly National Speed Limit single carriageways. The trip computer underreads by between 5 and 10% giving me a typical 55mpg average.

As with other replies on here fuel consumption is better in warmer weather, but how the official fuel figures are arrived at I've absolutely no idea.

By way of comparison, I used an Alfa Giulietta 2.0 JTDm for a few days which showed 49.5mpg whereas the brim to brim figure was 51.75mpg. I also used a VW Golf Bluemotion which showed 64mpg on the trip computer but ended up on fill up of 54. Both the Alfa and VW were on motorways and National Speed Limit single carriageways A-Roads.
 
Back
Top