In Italia it cost € 15.200,- with a TwinAir Turbo, start&stop 85 hp.Lovely.
Now, the price!?
Surely the whole point of the Trekking is to have better ground clearance. So why would you want to lower it?
I concur. Panda is not a "sporty" car regardless of how much you lower it and regardless of which huge wheels you manage to squeeze in. Panda always was a "micro-SUV" like design, I mean, on what kind of "sporty" car you sit as high?Surely the whole point of the Trekking is to have better ground clearance. So why would you want to lower it?
I concur. Panda is not a "sporty" car regardless of how much you lower it and regardless of which huge wheels you manage to squeeze in. Panda always was a "micro-SUV" like design, I mean, on what kind of "sporty" car you sit as high?
I like this Trekking idea very much - I'd appreciate to have bit more of off-road ruggedness. So you can go in the forest/park roads without need to plow on muddy fields, and pay a lot extra/complicate design with 4x4.
I think 100hp is tries very hard to look like one. But center of gravity is still too high, and drag coefficient is of same "flying brick". All which of real "sportiness" there is acceleration from standstill and spinemelter(tm) suspension. But its obvious that FIAT were very clever to cater for certain market which more after the *looks* (red ones go faster )I think the Panda can be a perfectly sporty car - what about the 100HP's on here?