Hellcat said:
I think the major petrol companies do advertise their fuel as better for your engine. I hear BP ultimate adverts all the time on the radio.
All fuel does come from a refinery - doesn't mean it all was refined to the same extent. Asda crisps are made by KP.. doesn't mean they taste as good as branded crisps made in the same factory.
As for morrisons fuel.. it managed to clog up my diesel filter causing the engine to starve! Its not as if the diesel filter is fine!
Sorry Hellcat but that is showing a slight ignorance for the oil industry. It's not like having a different oven for KP and asda crisps, we're talking multi-million pound kit here. Cat crackers/fractional distillation columns etc. can only produce one type of product at a time - continuous process. Investment in a new fuel range like Optimax/V-power or BP ultimate would have been multi-billion pounds, not just in research but also new kit. A whole new section to an oil refinery would have been built and used solely for that. There is NO WAY that I can think of that the base fuel from a refinery will be different depending on which lorry takes the supply away.
What could be different then?
Well a lot of people state additives, I will have this looked into next academic year and get back to you. Do remember however that it wouldn't simply be an issue of opening a little screw lid on tankers and pouring in a jar of "super additive" and hoping it will mix doing 56mph on a motorway.
Apart from optimax adverts - the first release of which had to be withdrawn due to repeated and upheld complaints against their false advertising - I can't recall Shell ever stating "our fuel is better than tesco's" (for example). Since making the fuel better would cost £billions you can sure as hell bet they would make it very clear.
I of course am wiling to accept that optimax and ultimate and other higher quality fuels will have a benefit to some cars (Ferrari 575 owned by shell for optimax testing runs better on 95 octane standard fuel, go figure). However, simply assuming "It is cheaper so it is worse" is a false economy, or a false false economy should I say.
I will categorically states that in my honest opinion there is no feasible way for the output from a refinery to be varied between tanker. I will state that there is the opportunity that different detergents are used (who is to say whose are best of course) and that storage can vary (again, who is to say whose is best).
Damn, I wish I had chosen the oil sector rather than the bloody gas sector