it depends what models really but going on there cheapest basic speakers-
(best)
jbl
fli
sony
jvc
fusion
pioneer
kenwood
(worst)
That is totally wrong perhaps i overrated Pioneer a bit and yes JBL are actually very good for subs and the amps although ugly arent actually that bad.
This is a silly q to ask though as there are far too many factors to consider.
i made sure i said there cheapest basic speakers, cos kenwood and pioneer both sell 6.5" speakers for about 20 quid, and imo, they sound crap! iv got some fli's in my car, there alright, jbl's are better deffo, sony are ok but not as good as these fli's, jvc are poo but better than kenwood and pioneer, fusion's cheapest speakers are also poo, but they are better than the kenwood and pionner's 20 quid speakers, but they arnt bad for 20 quid still crap tho.
LMAO @ this thread.
and tbh you wont get "perfect sounds out the boot of a punto"
.
apparently fusions top end gear is good, but where talking there top end stuff which costs alot! there low end range is poo in my experiance.ive been looking at fusion speakers/subs/amps and they look well built but will they provide good sound for the money?
or would kenwood products give a better quality for its money.
cheers guys
i would go jbl but there super ugly.
apparently fusions top end gear is good, but where talking there top end stuff which costs alot! there low end range is poo in my experiance.
id go with jbl, why does it matter what they look like? and imo, i think jbl stuff looks very nice, looks plain, not chavvy and looks quite classy.