Tuning running rich or lean?? AFR gauge vid

Currently reading:
Tuning running rich or lean?? AFR gauge vid

This was filmed on idle I assume? It oscilates around 14.7 on idle and jumps around on pressing the gas pedal. This is about right. Below 14.7 is rich, above is lean (y)

But in all honesty, you should get your homework done about AFR, fueling, lambda correction etc. if you need to ask such a question.
 
This was filmed on idle I assume? It oscilates around 14.7 on idle and jumps around on pressing the gas pedal. This is about right. Below 14.7 is rich, above is lean (y)

But in all honesty, you should get your homework done about AFR, fueling, lambda correction etc. if you need to ask such a question.

ah right well im running fairly lean then :( i took it for a drive and touches 17 at times just short drive without giving it any real boost...even 5th gear cruise off boost its running lean at around 15?? :(
 
When you're cruising or at idle it should be somewhere on around 14.7 it may even be higher (leaner) when you back off the throttle. When you're accelerating/boosting or under load it should be between 11 and 13 (on a turbocharged car), sometimes even lower (richer) ideally.

This will give you a VERY rough idea of how it works:

AFR_Torque.gif

You want to be to the left or on the left hand side of that flat bit in the middle of the graph at all times (except idle, cruise and backing off). Unfortunately its not really as simple as that graph makes it out to be, the torque moves around a bit under different conditions, with different engines and different fuels. In fact there is nearly an infinite number of varaibles due to hardware and circumstance which is why we need to tune in the first place. And then there is ignition timing which is a whole new ball game.
 
Last edited:
As said, it differs, pictures I have seen show 12.5 to be optimal for power.

On top of pictures like this you should also consider fuel addition for cooling effects in turbo applications. I have setup mine for 11.5 at full boost, 12.5 when entering boost. This kills the power I guess, but keeps EGT under control and prevents unwanted knock. This is also what very modern ECUs do. For extreme setups I have heard of people going as low as 10 AFR.

Brin, btw, here is a nice bed time read for you:

http://www.megamanual.com/begintuning.htm
 
it should be jumping around from rich to lean at tickover and at lower revs(closed loop) and when on boost should be rich(open loop) just had all new gauges in my track scooby and weird to see it jumping around.
 
narrow band as just need to see if running rich on boost and will be going wideband when i get syveccs ecu later in the year with my new forged 2.1 lump(roll on 500 bhp:slayer:)
 
well seeing as my car is set up by the countrys best subaru tuner i think its ok.this gauge is just to be able to see what fuelling is like at a quick glance and tto check no lambda sensor problems.car runs over 300 bhp now and perfect.most peoples tubo cars go bang due to too much boost and poor maintanance not a narrow band gauge being used.
 
Believe me you never tweek a scooby as they go bang easily.best left to people that do it for a living.
 
This is basically the thinking that costed the individual I quoted couple of posts back three engines.

If he has had 3 engines go bang then its not the fault of a narrow band gauge me likely fault that caused 1st engine to go not fixed properly.I know someone that fitted fmic to a scooby with no remap and took 4 blown engines before he believed it had to be mapped.
 
I think the point Woj is trying to make is a narrow band gauge doesn't give you any useful information on a turbo charged car unless you care about emissions or just like flashing lights. A narrow band will show a rich condition even when a turbo charged car is running dangerously lean. Anyhow Brin was talking about how a wideband should respond and your answer related to how a narrow band would respond which is why I pointed it out.
 
Yes, this is exactly the point I was trying to make, nothing less, nothing more. Everything else said I would not argue with (y)
 
Back
Top