technically its gone down for me
4 to a 7e
1-20 now its 1-50
4 to a 7e
1-20 now its 1-50
Bring on the snow chains and going where no punto has gone before
These are the epic voyages of the Fiat Punto
Seeking out terrain that surly shouldnt be passable!
was funny tho watching RWD and some pickup 4wd's been stuck and all the small **** taken cars and just going along fine
Ziggy
whats the ABI scale?
Is it just so cars be put into better catagories more suited?
So Small cars like the punto with less Safety features is going to be higher
Then a Another small car with lots of airbag and safety features
Along with the cars valves/performance etc?
Ziggy
Even though the insurance group from 4 - 7 looks bad surly it should not make any difference to insurance cost and its just been more accurate.
But of course insurance companise are going to take any advantage to make more money so it is inevatable that it will go up annoyinngly.
That seems like pretty sound logic to meOf course, it won't make a blind bit of difference to the price you/we pay but it's nice to think like that
![]()
Yeah they seem to think that having 3 cold snowy winters in a row is an excuse to take the pi$$.
It also takes into account the availability of spare parts and, as previously stated, accident statistics.
Yea Panda is quite a low group.
A certain model of the panda is also in group 1 in the 1-50 groups.
Also in group 1 are a model of: the new shape vauxhall corsa, citroen c1 and chevrolet spark.
I don't see why they can't just 'load' the premiums of those that claimed I don't want to pay for idiots claims because they can't drive with a bit of snow on the road :bang: